The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Barriers and motivators to undertaking physical activity in adults ≥ 70—A systematic review of the quantitative literature

Barriers and motivators to undertaking physical activity in adults ≥ 70—A systematic review of the quantitative literature
Barriers and motivators to undertaking physical activity in adults ≥ 70—A systematic review of the quantitative literature
Background: physical activity (PA) has multiple important benefits for older adults, but many do not undertake the recommended amount. This systematic review examined the quantitative literature detailing barriers and motivators to PA in older adults: a concurrent qualitative review is underway. Previous reviews investigated younger age groups or specific diseases.

Method: we included adults ≥70 years, observational studies and baseline data for randomised controlled trials (RCTs); we excluded studies of specific disease groups, care home residents, and rates of cognitive impairment above population norms. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO on 25th February 2020. We assessed risk-of-bias using ROBANS. We undertook a narrative review; meta-analysis was not possible. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021160503).

Results: we identified 35 papers (24 cross-sectional studies, eight prospective cohort studies, two studies of baseline data from RCTs and one mixed method study); n = 26,264 subjects, median age 77.7 years (range 70–101) and median percentage female 62.1% (range 0–100). Quality assessment identified low risk-of-bias overall, except two studies were identified as having a high risk-of-bias for one section (confounding variables). The most cited barriers were physical health (N = 14 studies), environmental factors (N = 12), fear of falls (N = 7) and lack of interest (N = 4). Other barriers identified were lack of company (N = 1) and urine leakage (in women) (N = 1). Key motivating factors included social aspects of PA (N = 8), intrinsic/psychological (e.g. self-determination, future orientation) (N = 8), health (e.g. doctor’s advice) (N = 7) and environmental (e.g. nearby green space) (N = 4).

Discussion: this review identified key barriers and motivators to PA in older adults. There is a lack of evidence for the oldest old. These findings should be used to create trials of suitable interventions which enable older adults to take up and maintain recommended levels of PA. The wide range of factors we identified indicates an individualised approach may be best.
0002-0729
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Rutherford, M.J.
df94ef17-53dc-46d9-8c49-2cbd88cdda28
Higson, J.M.K.
8f645d7f-9498-4310-ba38-8eaae97ada11
McNiff, J.A.
49949923-a65d-4ccc-83c7-33bd0fa8a4f0
Mitchell, S.
4c7b5c12-ef02-4a79-9411-7747993f2ef7
Wijayendran, A.
7f4f0150-56d9-4082-a980-67506c65c138
Shenkin, Susan D.
de7fe6ec-aae0-411a-a15f-541fab7a76c7
Kilgour, Alixe
ede25101-93a8-475a-8486-3faacbf35f3d
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Rutherford, M.J.
df94ef17-53dc-46d9-8c49-2cbd88cdda28
Higson, J.M.K.
8f645d7f-9498-4310-ba38-8eaae97ada11
McNiff, J.A.
49949923-a65d-4ccc-83c7-33bd0fa8a4f0
Mitchell, S.
4c7b5c12-ef02-4a79-9411-7747993f2ef7
Wijayendran, A.
7f4f0150-56d9-4082-a980-67506c65c138
Shenkin, Susan D.
de7fe6ec-aae0-411a-a15f-541fab7a76c7
Kilgour, Alixe
ede25101-93a8-475a-8486-3faacbf35f3d

Lim, Stephen, Rutherford, M.J., Higson, J.M.K., McNiff, J.A., Mitchell, S., Wijayendran, A., Shenkin, Susan D. and Kilgour, Alixe (2022) Barriers and motivators to undertaking physical activity in adults ≥ 70—A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Age and Ageing, 51 (Supplement 2). (doi:10.1093/ageing/afac126.080).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: physical activity (PA) has multiple important benefits for older adults, but many do not undertake the recommended amount. This systematic review examined the quantitative literature detailing barriers and motivators to PA in older adults: a concurrent qualitative review is underway. Previous reviews investigated younger age groups or specific diseases.

Method: we included adults ≥70 years, observational studies and baseline data for randomised controlled trials (RCTs); we excluded studies of specific disease groups, care home residents, and rates of cognitive impairment above population norms. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO on 25th February 2020. We assessed risk-of-bias using ROBANS. We undertook a narrative review; meta-analysis was not possible. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021160503).

Results: we identified 35 papers (24 cross-sectional studies, eight prospective cohort studies, two studies of baseline data from RCTs and one mixed method study); n = 26,264 subjects, median age 77.7 years (range 70–101) and median percentage female 62.1% (range 0–100). Quality assessment identified low risk-of-bias overall, except two studies were identified as having a high risk-of-bias for one section (confounding variables). The most cited barriers were physical health (N = 14 studies), environmental factors (N = 12), fear of falls (N = 7) and lack of interest (N = 4). Other barriers identified were lack of company (N = 1) and urine leakage (in women) (N = 1). Key motivating factors included social aspects of PA (N = 8), intrinsic/psychological (e.g. self-determination, future orientation) (N = 8), health (e.g. doctor’s advice) (N = 7) and environmental (e.g. nearby green space) (N = 4).

Discussion: this review identified key barriers and motivators to PA in older adults. There is a lack of evidence for the oldest old. These findings should be used to create trials of suitable interventions which enable older adults to take up and maintain recommended levels of PA. The wide range of factors we identified indicates an individualised approach may be best.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 June 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473739
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473739
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: 1d67c00c-2a38-4639-8b45-d8eef86a59f7
ORCID for Stephen Lim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-2362

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jan 2023 19:59
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Stephen Lim ORCID iD
Author: M.J. Rutherford
Author: J.M.K. Higson
Author: J.A. McNiff
Author: S. Mitchell
Author: A. Wijayendran
Author: Susan D. Shenkin
Author: Alixe Kilgour

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×