The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reflections: Insomnia? Try counting leadership theories

Reflections: Insomnia? Try counting leadership theories
Reflections: Insomnia? Try counting leadership theories

40 years ago, it was argued that despite years of research we still did not understand leadership. A similar argument was presented in this journal just last year. This article presents some reflections based on both my experience of researching leadership and of working with leaders. In doing this the myriad of theories of leadership are explored and key trends identified. Perhaps the most significant of these is the recognition of leadership as a dynamic relational process. This enables us to move from a leader-centric focus in research to one that recognizes the active participation of followers in the leadership process. In addition, the limitations of research to date, and its lack of relevance to practice are discussed, followed by proposed actions that could be taken to help develop a clearer understanding of the nature of leadership and improve relevance for practitioners. The article concludes with the view that we do know a lot about leaders and their impact on a wide range of outcomes. However, we still know relatively little about leadership.

Leadership, leaders, leadership theories, research methods, research relevance
1469-7017
355-372
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3
Higgs, Malcolm
bd61667f-4b7c-4caf-9d79-aee907c03ae3

Higgs, Malcolm (2022) Reflections: Insomnia? Try counting leadership theories. Change Management Journal, 22 (4), 355-372. (doi:10.1080/14697017.2022.2139246).

Record type: Article

Abstract

40 years ago, it was argued that despite years of research we still did not understand leadership. A similar argument was presented in this journal just last year. This article presents some reflections based on both my experience of researching leadership and of working with leaders. In doing this the myriad of theories of leadership are explored and key trends identified. Perhaps the most significant of these is the recognition of leadership as a dynamic relational process. This enables us to move from a leader-centric focus in research to one that recognizes the active participation of followers in the leadership process. In addition, the limitations of research to date, and its lack of relevance to practice are discussed, followed by proposed actions that could be taken to help develop a clearer understanding of the nature of leadership and improve relevance for practitioners. The article concludes with the view that we do know a lot about leaders and their impact on a wide range of outcomes. However, we still know relatively little about leadership.

Text
Reflections_AcceotedHiggs_JOCM_Accepted_October2022 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (92kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 November 2022
Keywords: Leadership, leaders, leadership theories, research methods, research relevance

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473990
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473990
ISSN: 1469-7017
PURE UUID: fd175d09-6b5d-42e7-a0ba-c378d06e1ea7
ORCID for Malcolm Higgs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9032-0416

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Feb 2023 17:53
Last modified: 01 May 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×