Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies
Objective: To understand the experiences and perceptions of people implementing maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries, and the mechanisms by which this process can achieve its intended outcomes.
Methods: In June 2022, we systematically searched seven databases for qualitative studies of stakeholders implementing maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries. Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed their quality. We used thematic synthesis to derive descriptive themes and a realist approach to understand the context–mechanism–outcome configurations.
Findings: Fifty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Good outcomes (improved quality of care or reduced mortality) were underpinned by a functional action cycle. Mechanisms for effective death surveillance and response included learning, vigilance and implementation of recommendations which motivated further engagement. The key context to enable effective death surveillance and response was a blame-free learning environment with good leadership. Inadequate outcomes (lack of improvement in care and mortality and discontinuation of death surveillance and response) resulted from a vicious cycle of under-reporting, inaccurate data, and inadequate review and recommendations, which led to demotivation and disengagement. Some harmful outcomes were reported, such as inappropriate referrals and worsened staff shortages, which resulted from a fear of negative consequences, including blame, disciplinary action or litigation.
Conclusion Conditions needed for effective maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response include: separation of the process from litigation and disciplinary procedures; comprehensive guidelines and training; adequate resources to implement recommendations; and supportive supervision to enable safe learning.
62-75G
Willcox, Merlin L.
dad5b622-9ac2-417d-9b2e-aad41b64ffea
A. Okello, Immaculate
16c689ef-4be1-4489-943b-6feae3bf2831
Maidwell-Smith, Alice
0ecddf8b-0b0c-405c-a30d-66fa512a4c9e
Tura, Abera K.
5fdd1db6-2cff-4e91-beb1-06b5f5616e9c
van den Akker, Thomas
197b07b5-7d69-4373-80df-9e917ad5632d
Knight, Marian
f49df80a-60ef-4573-a371-b03d66cf11ed
3 January 2023
Willcox, Merlin L.
dad5b622-9ac2-417d-9b2e-aad41b64ffea
A. Okello, Immaculate
16c689ef-4be1-4489-943b-6feae3bf2831
Maidwell-Smith, Alice
0ecddf8b-0b0c-405c-a30d-66fa512a4c9e
Tura, Abera K.
5fdd1db6-2cff-4e91-beb1-06b5f5616e9c
van den Akker, Thomas
197b07b5-7d69-4373-80df-9e917ad5632d
Knight, Marian
f49df80a-60ef-4573-a371-b03d66cf11ed
Willcox, Merlin L., A. Okello, Immaculate, Maidwell-Smith, Alice, Tura, Abera K., van den Akker, Thomas and Knight, Marian
(2023)
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 101 (1), , [22.288797].
(doi:10.2471/BLT.22.288703).
Abstract
Objective: To understand the experiences and perceptions of people implementing maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries, and the mechanisms by which this process can achieve its intended outcomes.
Methods: In June 2022, we systematically searched seven databases for qualitative studies of stakeholders implementing maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries. Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed their quality. We used thematic synthesis to derive descriptive themes and a realist approach to understand the context–mechanism–outcome configurations.
Findings: Fifty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Good outcomes (improved quality of care or reduced mortality) were underpinned by a functional action cycle. Mechanisms for effective death surveillance and response included learning, vigilance and implementation of recommendations which motivated further engagement. The key context to enable effective death surveillance and response was a blame-free learning environment with good leadership. Inadequate outcomes (lack of improvement in care and mortality and discontinuation of death surveillance and response) resulted from a vicious cycle of under-reporting, inaccurate data, and inadequate review and recommendations, which led to demotivation and disengagement. Some harmful outcomes were reported, such as inappropriate referrals and worsened staff shortages, which resulted from a fear of negative consequences, including blame, disciplinary action or litigation.
Conclusion Conditions needed for effective maternal and/or perinatal death surveillance and response include: separation of the process from litigation and disciplinary procedures; comprehensive guidelines and training; adequate resources to implement recommendations; and supportive supervision to enable safe learning.
Text
BLT.22.288703
- Version of Record
Available under License Other.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 November 2022
Published date: 3 January 2023
Additional Information:
Funding: MW’s salary is partly funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR 302412).
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 474277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474277
ISSN: 0042-9686
PURE UUID: 11d82ea3-9df9-4dbb-908b-c135c6909fd0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Feb 2023 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Immaculate A. Okello
Author:
Alice Maidwell-Smith
Author:
Abera K. Tura
Author:
Thomas van den Akker
Author:
Marian Knight
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics