The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patient-centered discussions about disease progression, symptom, and treatment burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease could facilitate the integration of end-of-life discussions in the disease trajectory: patient, clinician, and literature perspectives: a multimethod approach

Patient-centered discussions about disease progression, symptom, and treatment burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease could facilitate the integration of end-of-life discussions in the disease trajectory: patient, clinician, and literature perspectives: a multimethod approach
Patient-centered discussions about disease progression, symptom, and treatment burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease could facilitate the integration of end-of-life discussions in the disease trajectory: patient, clinician, and literature perspectives: a multimethod approach
Background: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seldom discuss preferences for future care/treatments with clinicians. The lack of discussions prevents the delivery of care grounded on patient preferences. Instead, treatments become increasingly burdensome as disease progresses and patients approach the end of life.

Objective: identify current and best practice in initiating and conducting conversations about future and palliative care, by integrating data from multiple sources.

Design: multiphasic study where the findings of a systematic literature review and qualitative interviews were combined and synthesized using a triangulation protocol.

Setting/Participants: thirty-three patients with COPD and 14 clinicians from multiple backgrounds were recruited in the United Kingdom.

Results: clinicians' and patients' poor understanding about palliative care and COPD, difficulties in timing and initiating discussions, and service rationing were the main factors for late discussions. Divergent perspectives between patients and clinicians about palliative care discussions often prevented their start. Instead, early and gradual patient-centered discussions on treatment choices, symptom, and treatment burden were recommended by patients, clinicians, and the literature. Earlier patient-centered discussions may reduce their emotional impact and enable patients to participate fully, while enabling clinicians to provide timely and accurate information on illness progression and appropriate self-management techniques.

Conclusion: current approaches toward palliative care discussions in COPD do not guarantee that patients' preferences are met. Early and gradual patient-centered discussions may enable patients to fully express their care preferences as they evolve over time, while minimizing the impact of symptom and treatment burden.
1096-6218
Tavares, Nuno
0c84c4d2-4cbd-4acb-82fe-664bd2b54415
Jarrett, Nikki
acfc2414-c001-4fde-950d-b767fc7fa83d
Wilkinson, Tom M.A.
8c55ebbb-e547-445c-95a1-c8bed02dd652
Hunt, Katherine J.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Tavares, Nuno
0c84c4d2-4cbd-4acb-82fe-664bd2b54415
Jarrett, Nikki
acfc2414-c001-4fde-950d-b767fc7fa83d
Wilkinson, Tom M.A.
8c55ebbb-e547-445c-95a1-c8bed02dd652
Hunt, Katherine J.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e

Tavares, Nuno, Jarrett, Nikki, Wilkinson, Tom M.A. and Hunt, Katherine J. (2022) Patient-centered discussions about disease progression, symptom, and treatment burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease could facilitate the integration of end-of-life discussions in the disease trajectory: patient, clinician, and literature perspectives: a multimethod approach. Journal of Palliative Medicine. (doi:10.1089/jpm.2022.0028).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seldom discuss preferences for future care/treatments with clinicians. The lack of discussions prevents the delivery of care grounded on patient preferences. Instead, treatments become increasingly burdensome as disease progresses and patients approach the end of life.

Objective: identify current and best practice in initiating and conducting conversations about future and palliative care, by integrating data from multiple sources.

Design: multiphasic study where the findings of a systematic literature review and qualitative interviews were combined and synthesized using a triangulation protocol.

Setting/Participants: thirty-three patients with COPD and 14 clinicians from multiple backgrounds were recruited in the United Kingdom.

Results: clinicians' and patients' poor understanding about palliative care and COPD, difficulties in timing and initiating discussions, and service rationing were the main factors for late discussions. Divergent perspectives between patients and clinicians about palliative care discussions often prevented their start. Instead, early and gradual patient-centered discussions on treatment choices, symptom, and treatment burden were recommended by patients, clinicians, and the literature. Earlier patient-centered discussions may reduce their emotional impact and enable patients to participate fully, while enabling clinicians to provide timely and accurate information on illness progression and appropriate self-management techniques.

Conclusion: current approaches toward palliative care discussions in COPD do not guarantee that patients' preferences are met. Early and gradual patient-centered discussions may enable patients to fully express their care preferences as they evolve over time, while minimizing the impact of symptom and treatment burden.

Text
Patient-centered discussions in COPD - Accepted Manuscript
Download (35kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 August 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 October 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474322
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474322
ISSN: 1096-6218
PURE UUID: 7fdadc11-c46d-43c6-b683-8638201814e6
ORCID for Katherine J. Hunt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7319

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Feb 2023 17:38
Last modified: 25 Jun 2024 01:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nuno Tavares
Author: Nikki Jarrett

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×