The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluating The environmental microbiota across four national health service hospitals within England

Evaluating The environmental microbiota across four national health service hospitals within England
Evaluating The environmental microbiota across four national health service hospitals within England

Hospital surfaces contaminated with microbial soiling, such as dry surface biofilms (DSBs), can act as a reservoir for pathogenic micro-organisms, and inhibit their detection and removal during routine cleaning. Studies have recognized that such increases in bioburden can hinder the impact of disinfectants and mask the detection of potential pathogens. Cleanliness within healthcare settings is often determined through routine culture-based analysis, whereby surfaces that exhibit >2.5 colony-forming units (CFU) per cm 2 pose a risk to patient health; therefore, any underestimation could have detrimental effects. This study quantified microbial growth on high-touch surfaces in four hospitals in England over 19 months. This was achieved using environmental swabs to sample a variety of surfaces within close proximity of the patient, and plating these on to non-specific low nutrient detection agar. The presence of DSBs on surfaces physically removed from the environment was confirmed using real-time imaging through episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy combined with epifluorescence. Approximately two-thirds of surfaces tested exceeded the limit for cleanliness (median 2230 CFU/cm 2), whilst 83% of surfaces imaged with BacLight LIVE/DEAD staining confirmed traces of biofilm. Differences in infection control methods, such as choice of surface disinfectants and cleaning personnel, were not reflected in the microbial variation observed and resulting risk to patients. This highlights a potential limitation in the effectiveness of the current standards for all hospital cleaning, and further development using representative clinical data is required to overcome this limitation.

Biofilms, Cleaning, Disinfection, Environmental contamination
0195-6701
203-212
Watson, Fergus
c4c3927e-47bf-4448-a0c2-13a767e28ad8
Wilks, Sandra
86c1f41a-12b3-451c-9245-b1a21775e993
Keevil, Bill
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Chewins, John
07e26e61-1058-4872-8c54-500a0c4b3c26
Watson, Fergus
c4c3927e-47bf-4448-a0c2-13a767e28ad8
Wilks, Sandra
86c1f41a-12b3-451c-9245-b1a21775e993
Keevil, Bill
cb7de0a7-ce33-4cfa-af52-07f99e5650eb
Chewins, John
07e26e61-1058-4872-8c54-500a0c4b3c26

Watson, Fergus, Wilks, Sandra, Keevil, Bill and Chewins, John (2022) Evaluating The environmental microbiota across four national health service hospitals within England. Journal of Hospital Infection, 131, 203-212. (doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2022.11.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Hospital surfaces contaminated with microbial soiling, such as dry surface biofilms (DSBs), can act as a reservoir for pathogenic micro-organisms, and inhibit their detection and removal during routine cleaning. Studies have recognized that such increases in bioburden can hinder the impact of disinfectants and mask the detection of potential pathogens. Cleanliness within healthcare settings is often determined through routine culture-based analysis, whereby surfaces that exhibit >2.5 colony-forming units (CFU) per cm 2 pose a risk to patient health; therefore, any underestimation could have detrimental effects. This study quantified microbial growth on high-touch surfaces in four hospitals in England over 19 months. This was achieved using environmental swabs to sample a variety of surfaces within close proximity of the patient, and plating these on to non-specific low nutrient detection agar. The presence of DSBs on surfaces physically removed from the environment was confirmed using real-time imaging through episcopic differential interference contrast microscopy combined with epifluorescence. Approximately two-thirds of surfaces tested exceeded the limit for cleanliness (median 2230 CFU/cm 2), whilst 83% of surfaces imaged with BacLight LIVE/DEAD staining confirmed traces of biofilm. Differences in infection control methods, such as choice of surface disinfectants and cleaning personnel, were not reflected in the microbial variation observed and resulting risk to patients. This highlights a potential limitation in the effectiveness of the current standards for all hospital cleaning, and further development using representative clinical data is required to overcome this limitation.

Text
JHI-D-22-00596 (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 November 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 November 2022
Published date: 13 December 2022
Additional Information: Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: Biofilms, Cleaning, Disinfection, Environmental contamination

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474449
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474449
ISSN: 0195-6701
PURE UUID: 3bc4c24f-4604-4830-9688-cbdea6928c60
ORCID for Sandra Wilks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-9415
ORCID for Bill Keevil: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-7706

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Feb 2023 17:56
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Fergus Watson
Author: Sandra Wilks ORCID iD
Author: Bill Keevil ORCID iD
Author: John Chewins

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×