The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mission performance assessment of multimode propulsion for satellite servicing applications

Mission performance assessment of multimode propulsion for satellite servicing applications
Mission performance assessment of multimode propulsion for satellite servicing applications
We assess the mission performance of a multimode (monopropellant-electrospray dual-mode) propulsion system relative to current state-of-the-art chemical, electric, and hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems for satellite servicing applications. Performance is assessed for both low-Earth orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 100 kg) and geosynchronous orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 1000kg). First-order spacecraft sizing routines are developed to determine spacecraft properties for each propulsion system option based on historical data, propulsion system properties,and physical and geometric constraints. The overall servicing missions are decomposed into a set of discrete maneuvers for both servicer concepts. Simulations are developed for each maneuver and propulsion system to determine flight performance,including∆V and time of flight.

Finally, metrics of comparison between the different propulsion system options are proposed to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of each propulsion system option over the candidate mission scenarios. Mission scenarios are composed of admissible sequences of modeled maneuvers. Comparison metrics are then used to highlight the costs and benefits of the assessed propulsion system options relative to each other. Results indicate that the hybrid and multimode systems provide significant mission flexibility for satellite servicing applications, but the multimode does so with a significantly lower structural ratio.
Falcone, Giusy
3391e5b6-9243-4356-87c5-d6e3c9d2e820
Engel, Daniel L.
f54f5e98-164a-46e5-a324-5d24272a3082
Cortinovis, Marta
c9db9f87-1c7f-4dc3-8450-dd94e613d7aa
Ryan, Charles
3627e47b-01b8-4ddb-b248-4243aad1f872
Rovey, Joshua L.
c65ab87d-0f5f-49fc-9c5d-3e268f5679d6
Putnam, Zachary R.
0cc9e120-8006-45ee-b436-52c35bf50518
Berg, Steven P.
4705d4ae-0905-4016-83f4-414a62328d51
Lembeck, Michael F.
179dc47a-994d-45fd-9ec2-670d68dc4567
Falcone, Giusy
3391e5b6-9243-4356-87c5-d6e3c9d2e820
Engel, Daniel L.
f54f5e98-164a-46e5-a324-5d24272a3082
Cortinovis, Marta
c9db9f87-1c7f-4dc3-8450-dd94e613d7aa
Ryan, Charles
3627e47b-01b8-4ddb-b248-4243aad1f872
Rovey, Joshua L.
c65ab87d-0f5f-49fc-9c5d-3e268f5679d6
Putnam, Zachary R.
0cc9e120-8006-45ee-b436-52c35bf50518
Berg, Steven P.
4705d4ae-0905-4016-83f4-414a62328d51
Lembeck, Michael F.
179dc47a-994d-45fd-9ec2-670d68dc4567

Falcone, Giusy, Engel, Daniel L., Cortinovis, Marta, Ryan, Charles, Rovey, Joshua L., Putnam, Zachary R., Berg, Steven P. and Lembeck, Michael F. (2022) Mission performance assessment of multimode propulsion for satellite servicing applications. In 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO). 19 pp . (doi:10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843839).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

We assess the mission performance of a multimode (monopropellant-electrospray dual-mode) propulsion system relative to current state-of-the-art chemical, electric, and hybrid chemical-electric propulsion systems for satellite servicing applications. Performance is assessed for both low-Earth orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 100 kg) and geosynchronous orbit servicers (with total mass of approximately 1000kg). First-order spacecraft sizing routines are developed to determine spacecraft properties for each propulsion system option based on historical data, propulsion system properties,and physical and geometric constraints. The overall servicing missions are decomposed into a set of discrete maneuvers for both servicer concepts. Simulations are developed for each maneuver and propulsion system to determine flight performance,including∆V and time of flight.

Finally, metrics of comparison between the different propulsion system options are proposed to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of each propulsion system option over the candidate mission scenarios. Mission scenarios are composed of admissible sequences of modeled maneuvers. Comparison metrics are then used to highlight the costs and benefits of the assessed propulsion system options relative to each other. Results indicate that the hybrid and multimode systems provide significant mission flexibility for satellite servicing applications, but the multimode does so with a significantly lower structural ratio.

Text
DARPA_Paper_FinalVersion - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Mission_Performance_Assessment_of_Multimode_Propulsion_for_Satellite_Servicing_Applications - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 5 March 2022
Venue - Dates: 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, Montana, United States, 2022-03-05 - 2022-03-12

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474499
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474499
PURE UUID: b26c1a5c-fc21-49b6-be32-59d2db8f6312

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Feb 2023 17:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 00:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Giusy Falcone
Author: Daniel L. Engel
Author: Marta Cortinovis
Author: Charles Ryan
Author: Joshua L. Rovey
Author: Zachary R. Putnam
Author: Steven P. Berg
Author: Michael F. Lembeck

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×