Multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals’ perceptions of current and optimal acute rehabilitation, a hip fracture example. A UK qualitative interview study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework
Multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals’ perceptions of current and optimal acute rehabilitation, a hip fracture example. A UK qualitative interview study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework
Objective: to understand multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals’ perceptions of current and optimal provision of acute rehabilitation, perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation, and their implications for patient recovery, using hip fracture as an example.
Methods: a qualitative design was adopted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 members of the acute multidisciplinary healthcare team (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, physicians, nurses) working on orthopaedic wards at 15 different hospitals across the UK. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and then thematically analysed drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework to enhance our understanding of the findings.
Results: we identified four themes: conceptualising a model of rehabilitative practice, which reflected the perceived variability of rehabilitation models, along with facilitators and common patient and organisational barriers for optimal rehabilitation; competing professional and organisational goals, which highlighted the reported incompatibility between organisational goals and person-centred care shaping rehabilitation practices, particularly for more vulnerable patients; engaging teams in collaborative practice, which related to the expressed need to work well with all members of the multidisciplinary team to achieve the same person-centred goals and share rehabilitation practices; and engaging patients and their carers, highlighting the importance of their involvement to achieve a holistic and collaborative approach to rehabilitation in the acute setting. Barriers and facilitators within themes were underpinned by the lack or presence of adequate ways of communicating with patients, carers, and multidisciplinary team members; resources (e.g. equipment, staffing, group classes), and support from people in leadership positions such as management and senior staff.
Conclusions: cornerstones of optimal acute rehabilitation are effective communication and collaborative practices between the multidisciplinary team, patients and carers. Supportive management and leadership are central to optimise these processes. Organisational constraints are the most commonly perceived barrier to delivering effective rehabilitation in hospital settings, which exacerbate silo working and limited patient engagement.
Guerra, Stefanny
0da5dbdf-8e5f-4dda-850e-4e62343f135b
Lambe, Kate
a7b51b14-a5ae-4a20-870b-cdbe330b62b3
Manolova, Gergana
25a2b4e0-6db7-4bef-bb65-af4a96a4fca8
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Sheehan, Katie J.
169381f1-f474-4b73-9941-9f58dd172137
18 November 2022
Guerra, Stefanny
0da5dbdf-8e5f-4dda-850e-4e62343f135b
Lambe, Kate
a7b51b14-a5ae-4a20-870b-cdbe330b62b3
Manolova, Gergana
25a2b4e0-6db7-4bef-bb65-af4a96a4fca8
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Sheehan, Katie J.
169381f1-f474-4b73-9941-9f58dd172137
Guerra, Stefanny, Lambe, Kate, Manolova, Gergana, Sadler, Euan and Sheehan, Katie J.
(2022)
Multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals’ perceptions of current and optimal acute rehabilitation, a hip fracture example. A UK qualitative interview study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.
PLoS ONE, 17 (11), [e0277986].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277986).
Abstract
Objective: to understand multidisciplinary team healthcare professionals’ perceptions of current and optimal provision of acute rehabilitation, perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation, and their implications for patient recovery, using hip fracture as an example.
Methods: a qualitative design was adopted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 members of the acute multidisciplinary healthcare team (occupational therapists, physiotherapists, physicians, nurses) working on orthopaedic wards at 15 different hospitals across the UK. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and then thematically analysed drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework to enhance our understanding of the findings.
Results: we identified four themes: conceptualising a model of rehabilitative practice, which reflected the perceived variability of rehabilitation models, along with facilitators and common patient and organisational barriers for optimal rehabilitation; competing professional and organisational goals, which highlighted the reported incompatibility between organisational goals and person-centred care shaping rehabilitation practices, particularly for more vulnerable patients; engaging teams in collaborative practice, which related to the expressed need to work well with all members of the multidisciplinary team to achieve the same person-centred goals and share rehabilitation practices; and engaging patients and their carers, highlighting the importance of their involvement to achieve a holistic and collaborative approach to rehabilitation in the acute setting. Barriers and facilitators within themes were underpinned by the lack or presence of adequate ways of communicating with patients, carers, and multidisciplinary team members; resources (e.g. equipment, staffing, group classes), and support from people in leadership positions such as management and senior staff.
Conclusions: cornerstones of optimal acute rehabilitation are effective communication and collaborative practices between the multidisciplinary team, patients and carers. Supportive management and leadership are central to optimise these processes. Organisational constraints are the most commonly perceived barrier to delivering effective rehabilitation in hospital settings, which exacerbate silo working and limited patient engagement.
Text
PONE-D-22-09908R2_FTC
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
journal.pone.0277986
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 November 2022
Published date: 18 November 2022
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This work was supported by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship [Grant Ref: MR/ S032819/1]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. https://www.ukri.org/what-we-offer/developing-people-and-skills/future-leaders-fellowships/. We would like to thank the participants who gave up their time to take part in the interviews.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Guerra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 474632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474632
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 9c23b68c-db53-484a-a300-6183bbe1aaf2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Feb 2023 17:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Stefanny Guerra
Author:
Kate Lambe
Author:
Gergana Manolova
Author:
Katie J. Sheehan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics