Whose science is it anyway? Reflections on how equality, diversity, and inclusion principles in research and policy engagement strategies can improve policy outcomes as exemplified in health research and policy
Whose science is it anyway? Reflections on how equality, diversity, and inclusion principles in research and policy engagement strategies can improve policy outcomes as exemplified in health research and policy
Consideration of Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) principles within the policy making process across the board will lead to more effective policy creation and implementation, and strengthen current research systems. By being deliberately interdisciplinary and intersectional in our approach to research and policy impact, we can aim to serve a wider scope of people in a way that matches the nuance, complexity, and variety of the lived experience. Finding effective policy engagement solutions must include consideration of EDI principles at each stage of the research-to-policy pipeline. This article offers introductory thoughts on how EDI can be practically implemented at the stages of research design and research funding to bring awareness to the need for embracing EDI principles. While we know that further information, data, and insight are needed when it comes to diversity in research, the research workforce, and funding allocation, our primary aim for this paper is to encourage reflection and critical assessment of how EDI might be considered at the very early stages of the evidence-to-policy pipeline.
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Bea, Laura Elizabeth
cd6760cc-7f9c-4ceb-8f1b-ac07180b8623
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Bea, Laura Elizabeth
cd6760cc-7f9c-4ceb-8f1b-ac07180b8623
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra and Bea, Laura Elizabeth
(2022)
Whose science is it anyway? Reflections on how equality, diversity, and inclusion principles in research and policy engagement strategies can improve policy outcomes as exemplified in health research and policy.
Cambridge Journal of Science and Policy, 3 (2).
(doi:10.17863/CAM.86425).
Abstract
Consideration of Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) principles within the policy making process across the board will lead to more effective policy creation and implementation, and strengthen current research systems. By being deliberately interdisciplinary and intersectional in our approach to research and policy impact, we can aim to serve a wider scope of people in a way that matches the nuance, complexity, and variety of the lived experience. Finding effective policy engagement solutions must include consideration of EDI principles at each stage of the research-to-policy pipeline. This article offers introductory thoughts on how EDI can be practically implemented at the stages of research design and research funding to bring awareness to the need for embracing EDI principles. While we know that further information, data, and insight are needed when it comes to diversity in research, the research workforce, and funding allocation, our primary aim for this paper is to encourage reflection and critical assessment of how EDI might be considered at the very early stages of the evidence-to-policy pipeline.
Text
55_WhoseScience_FINAL
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 July 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 474774
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474774
PURE UUID: acfaa737-3499-4e69-b3ee-0dd8d8f47e2d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Mar 2023 17:47
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Laura Elizabeth Bea
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics