The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Developing guidance for a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials: a mixed methods study

Developing guidance for a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials: a mixed methods study
Developing guidance for a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials: a mixed methods study
Background: Existing guidelines recommend statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation prior to the final analysis and that any interim analyses should be conducted by a separate team from the one undertaking the final analysis. However, there remains substantial variation in practice between UK Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) when it comes to blinding statisticians. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop guidance to advise CTUs on a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials.
Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach involving three stages: (I) a quantitative study using a cohort of 200 studies (from a major UK funder published between 2016 and 2020) to assess the impact of blinding statisticians on the proportion of trials reporting a statistically significant finding for the primary outcome(s); (II) a qualitative study using focus groups to determine the perspectives of key stakeholders on the practice of blinding trial statisticians; and (III) Combining the results of stages I and II, along with a stakeholder meeting, to develop guidance for UK CTUs.

Results: After screening abstracts 179 trials were included for review. The results of the primary analysis showed no evidence that involvement of an unblinded trial statistician was associated with the likelihood of statistically significant findings being reported, odds ratio (OR) 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 2.13). Six focus groups were conducted, with 37 participants. The triangulation between stages I and II resulted in developing 40 provisional statements. These were rated independently by the stakeholder group prior to the meeting. Ten statements reached agreement with no agreement on 30 statements. At the meeting, various factors were identified that could influence the decision of blinding the statistician, including timing, study design, types of intervention, and practicalities. Guidance including 21 recommendations/considerations was developed alongside a Risk Assessment Tool to provide CTUs with a framework for assessing the risks associated with blinding/not blinding statisticians and for identifying appropriate mitigation strategies.
Conclusions: This is the first study to develop a guidance document to enhance the understanding of blinding statisticians and to provide a framework for the decision-making process. The key finding was that the decision to blind statisticians should be based on the benefits and risks associated with a particular trial.

blinding, clinical trials, clinical trials unit, mixed methods, stakeholder meeting, statisticians, Blinding, Mixed methods, Clinical trials, Statisticians, Clinical trials unit, Stakeholder meeting
1745-6215
Iflaifel, Mais
fd3696c4-894f-4c86-86b8-e1f0cd8a9450
Sprange, Kirsty
2cb158fb-b2c5-45c9-9de6-423b8f64b888
Bell, Jennifer
73c6580c-6ba7-4e7c-8356-07e35e919a6d
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Gamble, Carrol
6d685bb2-1ec5-4e38-a8d4-3cf6f6e625ac
Julious, Steven A.
f43c38eb-8aaa-4f4c-a770-a68bc2321360
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Montgomery, Alan
4c3f57b5-cda7-45f9-a4ff-1c8075b61855
Partlett, Christopher
ff1ea90b-5254-4a96-809a-14d05b13a0d7
Iflaifel, Mais
fd3696c4-894f-4c86-86b8-e1f0cd8a9450
Sprange, Kirsty
2cb158fb-b2c5-45c9-9de6-423b8f64b888
Bell, Jennifer
73c6580c-6ba7-4e7c-8356-07e35e919a6d
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Gamble, Carrol
6d685bb2-1ec5-4e38-a8d4-3cf6f6e625ac
Julious, Steven A.
f43c38eb-8aaa-4f4c-a770-a68bc2321360
Juszczak, Edmund
9267758e-8ab8-44c7-ab14-48ef82fa6b6e
Linsell, Louise
bf220517-49cd-4fbb-8666-19d2a1de1257
Montgomery, Alan
4c3f57b5-cda7-45f9-a4ff-1c8075b61855
Partlett, Christopher
ff1ea90b-5254-4a96-809a-14d05b13a0d7

Iflaifel, Mais, Sprange, Kirsty, Bell, Jennifer, Cook, Andrew, Gamble, Carrol, Julious, Steven A., Juszczak, Edmund, Linsell, Louise, Montgomery, Alan and Partlett, Christopher (2023) Developing guidance for a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials: a mixed methods study. Trials, 24, [71]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06992-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Existing guidelines recommend statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation prior to the final analysis and that any interim analyses should be conducted by a separate team from the one undertaking the final analysis. However, there remains substantial variation in practice between UK Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) when it comes to blinding statisticians. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop guidance to advise CTUs on a risk-proportionate approach to blinding statisticians within clinical trials.
Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach involving three stages: (I) a quantitative study using a cohort of 200 studies (from a major UK funder published between 2016 and 2020) to assess the impact of blinding statisticians on the proportion of trials reporting a statistically significant finding for the primary outcome(s); (II) a qualitative study using focus groups to determine the perspectives of key stakeholders on the practice of blinding trial statisticians; and (III) Combining the results of stages I and II, along with a stakeholder meeting, to develop guidance for UK CTUs.

Results: After screening abstracts 179 trials were included for review. The results of the primary analysis showed no evidence that involvement of an unblinded trial statistician was associated with the likelihood of statistically significant findings being reported, odds ratio (OR) 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 2.13). Six focus groups were conducted, with 37 participants. The triangulation between stages I and II resulted in developing 40 provisional statements. These were rated independently by the stakeholder group prior to the meeting. Ten statements reached agreement with no agreement on 30 statements. At the meeting, various factors were identified that could influence the decision of blinding the statistician, including timing, study design, types of intervention, and practicalities. Guidance including 21 recommendations/considerations was developed alongside a Risk Assessment Tool to provide CTUs with a framework for assessing the risks associated with blinding/not blinding statisticians and for identifying appropriate mitigation strategies.
Conclusions: This is the first study to develop a guidance document to enhance the understanding of blinding statisticians and to provide a framework for the decision-making process. The key finding was that the decision to blind statisticians should be based on the benefits and risks associated with a particular trial.

Text
s13063-022-06992-5 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 December 2022
Published date: 31 January 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The study authors would like to thank the UK Clinical Research Collaboration for their support of the project. This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) CTU Support Funding scheme. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
Keywords: blinding, clinical trials, clinical trials unit, mixed methods, stakeholder meeting, statisticians, Blinding, Mixed methods, Clinical trials, Statisticians, Clinical trials unit, Stakeholder meeting

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474803
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474803
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: b8834cc5-a907-484e-8a2b-7d008b31d344
ORCID for Andrew Cook: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-439X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Mar 2023 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mais Iflaifel
Author: Kirsty Sprange
Author: Jennifer Bell
Author: Andrew Cook ORCID iD
Author: Carrol Gamble
Author: Steven A. Julious
Author: Edmund Juszczak
Author: Louise Linsell
Author: Alan Montgomery
Author: Christopher Partlett

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×