The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: A review of medical school curricula

Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: A review of medical school curricula
Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: A review of medical school curricula
The doctors of the future need to be empowered to deliver healthcare sustainably while protecting their patients’ health in the context of a degrading environment. This study aimed to objectively review the extent and nature of the teaching of planetary health and sustainability topics in UK medical education. A multi-centre national review of the timetabled teaching sessions in medical courses in the UK during the academic year 2020/2021 against the General Medical Council’s adopted ‘Educating for Sustainable Healthcare – Priority Learning Outcomes’. Medical students were recruited and reviewed the entirety of their own institution’s online teaching materials associated with core teaching sessions using a standardised data collection tool. Learning outcome coverage and estimated teaching time were calculated and used to rank participating medical schools. 45% of eligible UK medical schools were included in the study. The extent of teaching varied considerably amongst courses. Mean coverage of the 13 learning outcomes was 9.9 (SD:2.5) with a mean estimated teaching time of 140 min (SD:139). Courses with dedicated planetary health and sustainability sessions ranked best. There is large disparity in the education that medical students receive on these topics. Teaching may not adequately prioritise sustainability or reflect advances in planetary health knowledge.Practice pointsMedical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools.UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge.Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare.Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education.This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations. Practice points Medical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools. UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge. Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare. Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education. This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations.
figshare
Butler, Megan
f712aa66-c803-4b5a-97ad-91dcbfe9ba7e
Blyth, Rachel
a01c685b-f161-4fe0-ae92-fb51950c680f
Shah, Viraj
61a7bca9-fc1b-447f-8c01-837cfa7d9249
Russell, Benjamin
f9e6f620-f94b-4a4a-a071-83b4d30e5391
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Holtgrewe, Lydia
a2ccb4d9-95b8-4682-8345-514b51698f8c
Bevan, James
e7868ec6-3bf3-4838-bb52-e1f22253c5d5
Austin, Isobel
ff704764-8177-438a-b474-da259da3ba66
Cheung, Annie Hoi Ching
1243f59c-ed9c-4a23-a016-7369b3a84b8a
Butler, Megan
f712aa66-c803-4b5a-97ad-91dcbfe9ba7e
Blyth, Rachel
a01c685b-f161-4fe0-ae92-fb51950c680f
Shah, Viraj
61a7bca9-fc1b-447f-8c01-837cfa7d9249
Russell, Benjamin
f9e6f620-f94b-4a4a-a071-83b4d30e5391
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Holtgrewe, Lydia
a2ccb4d9-95b8-4682-8345-514b51698f8c
Bevan, James
e7868ec6-3bf3-4838-bb52-e1f22253c5d5
Austin, Isobel
ff704764-8177-438a-b474-da259da3ba66
Cheung, Annie Hoi Ching
1243f59c-ed9c-4a23-a016-7369b3a84b8a

(2022) Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: A review of medical school curricula. figshare doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21710273 [Dataset]

Record type: Dataset

Abstract

The doctors of the future need to be empowered to deliver healthcare sustainably while protecting their patients’ health in the context of a degrading environment. This study aimed to objectively review the extent and nature of the teaching of planetary health and sustainability topics in UK medical education. A multi-centre national review of the timetabled teaching sessions in medical courses in the UK during the academic year 2020/2021 against the General Medical Council’s adopted ‘Educating for Sustainable Healthcare – Priority Learning Outcomes’. Medical students were recruited and reviewed the entirety of their own institution’s online teaching materials associated with core teaching sessions using a standardised data collection tool. Learning outcome coverage and estimated teaching time were calculated and used to rank participating medical schools. 45% of eligible UK medical schools were included in the study. The extent of teaching varied considerably amongst courses. Mean coverage of the 13 learning outcomes was 9.9 (SD:2.5) with a mean estimated teaching time of 140 min (SD:139). Courses with dedicated planetary health and sustainability sessions ranked best. There is large disparity in the education that medical students receive on these topics. Teaching may not adequately prioritise sustainability or reflect advances in planetary health knowledge.Practice pointsMedical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools.UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge.Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare.Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education.This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations. Practice points Medical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools. UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge. Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare. Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education. This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474871
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474871
PURE UUID: b34611dc-3bd1-4d07-882d-5424fb71e719
ORCID for Simon Fraser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
ORCID for James Bevan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-6972

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Mar 2023 17:33
Last modified: 24 Jan 2024 03:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Contributor: Megan Butler
Contributor: Rachel Blyth
Contributor: Viraj Shah
Contributor: Benjamin Russell
Contributor: Simon Fraser ORCID iD
Contributor: Lydia Holtgrewe
Contributor: James Bevan ORCID iD
Contributor: Isobel Austin
Contributor: Annie Hoi Ching Cheung

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×