The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Editorial: tracking marine megafauna for conservation and marine spatial planning

Editorial: tracking marine megafauna for conservation and marine spatial planning
Editorial: tracking marine megafauna for conservation and marine spatial planning
Despite their important role in ecosystems, the widespread and increasing threats faced by many marine megafauna taxa has led to a poor conservation status of many species (e.g., Rees et al., 2016; Dias et al., 2019; Nelms et al., 2021; Jorgensen et al., 2022). Understanding and mitigating the threats faced by marine megafauna is challenging (Lascelles et al., 2014; Reisinger et al., 2022) because both the threats and the marine environment are highly dynamic in space and time, and animals’ occurrences vary with shifts in environmental and oceanographic conditions at different scales. Additionally, these animals are often highly mobile, making it difficult to pinpoint the occurrences of different individuals in specific locations.

There are several definitions for the term ‘marine megafauna’. For example, Estes et al. (2016) define marine megafauna as species with maximum reported mass >45 kg, including 338 extant species of cetaceans, pinnipeds, sirenians, the sea otter (Enhyrda lutris), the polar bear (Ursus maritimus), the emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri), marine reptiles, bony and cartilaginous fishes, cephalopods, and the giant clam (Tridacna gigas). Here, we take the view of Authier et al. (2017), who do not impose a strict body mass threshold, but consider marine megafauna to be a coherent group based on their ecological similarities (at or near the top of food webs, with no or few predators) and that share conservation issues.

This Research Topic covers a broad taxonomic representation, spanning seabirds, cetaceans, sea turtles, pinnipeds, elasmobranchs, teleosts, a sirenian, the polar bear, and a large crustacean, the red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus). Articles submitted address how biologging is being used to understand the movement behaviour and distribution of marine megafauna, and how this information can play a key role to prioritise conservation goals. The resulting 34 articles illustrate how biologging is informing conservation of marine megafauna, and in light of these studies, we discuss challenges, methodological implications and future directions for biologging in conservation.
biologging, climate change, fisheries, marine predators, marine protected areas, movement, offshore energy production
2296-7745
Pereira, Jorge M.
e70b9fbc-7490-4c89-aed9-f211d7235aab
Clay, Thomas A.
47bcaf22-03c9-4252-ac0e-4e36ebd2f6b6
Reisinger, Ryan R.
4eaf9440-48e5-41fa-853f-d46457e5444e
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
69540bd6-270e-4088-bc90-e9b578f795f6
Sequeira, Ana M.M.
2876358f-5def-413e-98ac-6ecd4eda6652
Pereira, Jorge M.
e70b9fbc-7490-4c89-aed9-f211d7235aab
Clay, Thomas A.
47bcaf22-03c9-4252-ac0e-4e36ebd2f6b6
Reisinger, Ryan R.
4eaf9440-48e5-41fa-853f-d46457e5444e
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
69540bd6-270e-4088-bc90-e9b578f795f6
Sequeira, Ana M.M.
2876358f-5def-413e-98ac-6ecd4eda6652

Pereira, Jorge M., Clay, Thomas A., Reisinger, Ryan R., Ropert-Coudert, Yan and Sequeira, Ana M.M. (2023) Editorial: tracking marine megafauna for conservation and marine spatial planning. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, [1119428]. (doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1119428).

Record type: Editorial

Abstract

Despite their important role in ecosystems, the widespread and increasing threats faced by many marine megafauna taxa has led to a poor conservation status of many species (e.g., Rees et al., 2016; Dias et al., 2019; Nelms et al., 2021; Jorgensen et al., 2022). Understanding and mitigating the threats faced by marine megafauna is challenging (Lascelles et al., 2014; Reisinger et al., 2022) because both the threats and the marine environment are highly dynamic in space and time, and animals’ occurrences vary with shifts in environmental and oceanographic conditions at different scales. Additionally, these animals are often highly mobile, making it difficult to pinpoint the occurrences of different individuals in specific locations.

There are several definitions for the term ‘marine megafauna’. For example, Estes et al. (2016) define marine megafauna as species with maximum reported mass >45 kg, including 338 extant species of cetaceans, pinnipeds, sirenians, the sea otter (Enhyrda lutris), the polar bear (Ursus maritimus), the emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri), marine reptiles, bony and cartilaginous fishes, cephalopods, and the giant clam (Tridacna gigas). Here, we take the view of Authier et al. (2017), who do not impose a strict body mass threshold, but consider marine megafauna to be a coherent group based on their ecological similarities (at or near the top of food webs, with no or few predators) and that share conservation issues.

This Research Topic covers a broad taxonomic representation, spanning seabirds, cetaceans, sea turtles, pinnipeds, elasmobranchs, teleosts, a sirenian, the polar bear, and a large crustacean, the red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus). Articles submitted address how biologging is being used to understand the movement behaviour and distribution of marine megafauna, and how this information can play a key role to prioritise conservation goals. The resulting 34 articles illustrate how biologging is informing conservation of marine megafauna, and in light of these studies, we discuss challenges, methodological implications and future directions for biologging in conservation.

Text
fmars-09-1119428 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (896kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 December 2022
Published date: 4 January 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: We thank all authors, reviewers, and editors that were involved in this Research Topic and greatly contributed to the quality and success of the work presented here. We also thank our colleagues Vitor Paiva and Jaime Ramos for proofreading a final version of the manuscript.
Keywords: biologging, climate change, fisheries, marine predators, marine protected areas, movement, offshore energy production

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474935
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474935
ISSN: 2296-7745
PURE UUID: 2347a4df-c0d2-4337-8dd5-4527a9d8cae9
ORCID for Ryan R. Reisinger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-6875

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Mar 2023 17:36
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jorge M. Pereira
Author: Thomas A. Clay
Author: Yan Ropert-Coudert
Author: Ana M.M. Sequeira

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×