Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment
Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment
Previous experimental and observational work suggests that people act more generously when they are observed and observe others in social settings. However, the explanation for this is unclear. An individual may want to send a signal of her generosity to improve her own reputation. Alternately (or additionally) she may value the public good or charity itself and, believing that contribution levels are strategic complements, give more to influence others to give more. We perform the first series of laboratory experiments that can separately estimate the impact of these two social effects, and test whether realized influence is consistent with the desire to influence, and whether either of these are consistent with anticipated influence. Our experimental subjects were given the opportunity to contribute from their endowment to Bread for the World, a development NGO. Depending on treatment, “leader” subjects’ donations were reported to other subjects either anonymously or with their identities, and these were reported either before these “follower” subjects made their donation decisions. We find that “leaders” are influential only when their identities are revealed along with their donations, and female leaders are more influential than males. Identified leaders’ predictions suggest that are aware of their influence. They respond to this by giving more than either the control group or the unidentified leaders. We find mixed evidence for “reputation-seeking.”
221–243
Reinstein, David
3650945d-1520-4c56-9ce7-a19f6c01133f
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
1 April 2011
Reinstein, David
3650945d-1520-4c56-9ce7-a19f6c01133f
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
Reinstein, David and Riener, Gerhard
(2011)
Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment.
Theory and Decision, 72, .
(doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9245-8).
Abstract
Previous experimental and observational work suggests that people act more generously when they are observed and observe others in social settings. However, the explanation for this is unclear. An individual may want to send a signal of her generosity to improve her own reputation. Alternately (or additionally) she may value the public good or charity itself and, believing that contribution levels are strategic complements, give more to influence others to give more. We perform the first series of laboratory experiments that can separately estimate the impact of these two social effects, and test whether realized influence is consistent with the desire to influence, and whether either of these are consistent with anticipated influence. Our experimental subjects were given the opportunity to contribute from their endowment to Bread for the World, a development NGO. Depending on treatment, “leader” subjects’ donations were reported to other subjects either anonymously or with their identities, and these were reported either before these “follower” subjects made their donation decisions. We find that “leaders” are influential only when their identities are revealed along with their donations, and female leaders are more influential than males. Identified leaders’ predictions suggest that are aware of their influence. They respond to this by giving more than either the control group or the unidentified leaders. We find mixed evidence for “reputation-seeking.”
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 475025
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475025
ISSN: 0040-5833
PURE UUID: 95847c68-3d2c-42e4-a765-cd227c497eeb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Mar 2023 17:56
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
David Reinstein
Author:
Gerhard Riener
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics