Examining the error of mis-specifying nonlinear confounding effect with application on accelerometer-measured physical activity
Examining the error of mis-specifying nonlinear confounding effect with application on accelerometer-measured physical activity
Purpose: Some confounders are nonlinearly associated with dependent variables, but they are often adjusted using a linear term. The purpose of this study was to examine the error of mis-specifying the nonlinear confounding effect. Methods: We carried out a simulation study to investigate the effect of adjusting for a nonlinear confounder in the estimation of a causal relationship between the exposure and outcome in 3 ways: using a linear term, binning into 5 equal-size categories, or using a restricted cubic spline of the confounder. Continuous, binary, and survival outcomes were simulated. We examined the confounder across varying measurement error. In addition, we performed a real data analysis examining the 3 strategies to handle the nonlinear effects of accelerometer-measured physical activity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006 data. Results: The mis-specification of a nonlinear confounder had little impact on causal effect estimation for continuous outcomes. For binary and survival outcomes, this mis-specification introduced bias, which could be eliminated using spline adjustment only when there is small measurement error of the confounder. Real data analysis showed that the associations between high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes and mortality adjusted for physical activity with restricted cubic spline were about 3% to 11% larger than their counterparts adjusted with a linear term. Conclusion: For continuous outcomes, confounders with nonlinear effects can be adjusting with a linear term. Spline adjustment should be used for binary and survival outcomes on confounders with small measurement error.
Causality, confounding factors, simulation, statistical models
203-208
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
3 April 2017
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Lee, Paul H.
(2017)
Examining the error of mis-specifying nonlinear confounding effect with application on accelerometer-measured physical activity.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/02701367.2017.1296101).
Abstract
Purpose: Some confounders are nonlinearly associated with dependent variables, but they are often adjusted using a linear term. The purpose of this study was to examine the error of mis-specifying the nonlinear confounding effect. Methods: We carried out a simulation study to investigate the effect of adjusting for a nonlinear confounder in the estimation of a causal relationship between the exposure and outcome in 3 ways: using a linear term, binning into 5 equal-size categories, or using a restricted cubic spline of the confounder. Continuous, binary, and survival outcomes were simulated. We examined the confounder across varying measurement error. In addition, we performed a real data analysis examining the 3 strategies to handle the nonlinear effects of accelerometer-measured physical activity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006 data. Results: The mis-specification of a nonlinear confounder had little impact on causal effect estimation for continuous outcomes. For binary and survival outcomes, this mis-specification introduced bias, which could be eliminated using spline adjustment only when there is small measurement error of the confounder. Real data analysis showed that the associations between high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes and mortality adjusted for physical activity with restricted cubic spline were about 3% to 11% larger than their counterparts adjusted with a linear term. Conclusion: For continuous outcomes, confounders with nonlinear effects can be adjusting with a linear term. Spline adjustment should be used for binary and survival outcomes on confounders with small measurement error.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 February 2017
Published date: 3 April 2017
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 SHAPE America.
Keywords:
Causality, confounding factors, simulation, statistical models
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 475150
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475150
ISSN: 0270-1367
PURE UUID: d52ce76a-1c8e-4abd-8385-6947e1a2ef00
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Mar 2023 17:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paul H. Lee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics