The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

6-year outcomes of the United Kingdom Medisoft® audit study following treatment with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema.

6-year outcomes of the United Kingdom Medisoft® audit study following treatment with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema.
6-year outcomes of the United Kingdom Medisoft® audit study following treatment with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema.
Purpose: The Medisoft study was designed as a retrospective audit of eyes treated with the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant and aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of FAc implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that persists or recurs despite treatment. Outcomes from this study have previously been reported in patients monitored for ≥3 years. We now report outcomes obtained in the last 3-years since the initial outcomes were reported.
Methods. The Medisoft audit tool was used to extract pseudo-anonymised electronic medical records (EMR), identifying only patients with DME that had been treated with the FAc implant across 14 UK clinical sites between 2014 and 2022. Clinical effectiveness and safety were measured.
Results. Data were available from 302 eyes (256 patients) with ≥3 years of follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 64.2±18.4 months [mean±SD]). Best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) was 56.8±15.6 letters, 59.2±17.1 letters and 60.54±15.6 letters at baseline, 3 and 6 years respectively. At years 3 and 6, stable/improved BRVA was observed in 75.6% and 74.6% respectively. The proportion of eyes with 6/12 (20/40) or better BRVA rose from 22.5% at baseline to 35.2% and 39.7%, respectively. In terms of safety, mean IOP was 16.3±4.1 mmHg at baseline and remained below a mean value of 21 mmHg at years 3 and 6. Around one third (36.1%) of eyes required topical IOP-lowering drops to control elevations in pressure (versus 21.5% of eyes pre-FAc implant) and IOP was >30 mmHg at a single time point post-FAc implant in 25.5% of eyes (versus 10.6 pre-FAc implant).
Conclusions. Over a 6-year follow-up period, UK EMR data obtained in real-world practice revealed that three-out-of-four patients with DME and treated with a FAc implant benefited from stable/improved BRVA and that one-in-three had visual acuity 6/12 or better. This data was obtained since the first eye was treated in the UK and is an ongoing study that will continue to monitor the outcomes and the management of DME patients in clinical practice.
Lotery, Andrew
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Bailey, Claire
64771a93-9067-488e-8a66-9ccde3209dd6
Chakravarthy, Usha
2c06cdaf-94c0-409a-8eff-2f624c120a5e
Mushtaq, Bushra
2140135c-0ee6-4b54-be37-d17c041e1fb0
Menon, Geeta
941f77e0-5d93-49a8-ac38-a250c4bdbc06
Talks, James Stephen
70688031-2e1f-4505-8515-ed206ab2bc09
Lotery, Andrew
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Bailey, Claire
64771a93-9067-488e-8a66-9ccde3209dd6
Chakravarthy, Usha
2c06cdaf-94c0-409a-8eff-2f624c120a5e
Mushtaq, Bushra
2140135c-0ee6-4b54-be37-d17c041e1fb0
Menon, Geeta
941f77e0-5d93-49a8-ac38-a250c4bdbc06
Talks, James Stephen
70688031-2e1f-4505-8515-ed206ab2bc09

Lotery, Andrew, Bailey, Claire, Chakravarthy, Usha, Mushtaq, Bushra, Menon, Geeta and Talks, James Stephen (2023) 6-year outcomes of the United Kingdom Medisoft® audit study following treatment with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, United States. 23 Apr - 27 Jul 2023. (In Press)

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Purpose: The Medisoft study was designed as a retrospective audit of eyes treated with the fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant and aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of FAc implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that persists or recurs despite treatment. Outcomes from this study have previously been reported in patients monitored for ≥3 years. We now report outcomes obtained in the last 3-years since the initial outcomes were reported.
Methods. The Medisoft audit tool was used to extract pseudo-anonymised electronic medical records (EMR), identifying only patients with DME that had been treated with the FAc implant across 14 UK clinical sites between 2014 and 2022. Clinical effectiveness and safety were measured.
Results. Data were available from 302 eyes (256 patients) with ≥3 years of follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 64.2±18.4 months [mean±SD]). Best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) was 56.8±15.6 letters, 59.2±17.1 letters and 60.54±15.6 letters at baseline, 3 and 6 years respectively. At years 3 and 6, stable/improved BRVA was observed in 75.6% and 74.6% respectively. The proportion of eyes with 6/12 (20/40) or better BRVA rose from 22.5% at baseline to 35.2% and 39.7%, respectively. In terms of safety, mean IOP was 16.3±4.1 mmHg at baseline and remained below a mean value of 21 mmHg at years 3 and 6. Around one third (36.1%) of eyes required topical IOP-lowering drops to control elevations in pressure (versus 21.5% of eyes pre-FAc implant) and IOP was >30 mmHg at a single time point post-FAc implant in 25.5% of eyes (versus 10.6 pre-FAc implant).
Conclusions. Over a 6-year follow-up period, UK EMR data obtained in real-world practice revealed that three-out-of-four patients with DME and treated with a FAc implant benefited from stable/improved BRVA and that one-in-three had visual acuity 6/12 or better. This data was obtained since the first eye was treated in the UK and is an ongoing study that will continue to monitor the outcomes and the management of DME patients in clinical practice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 February 2023
Venue - Dates: 2023 ARVO Annual Meeting, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, United States, 2023-04-23 - 2023-07-27

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475179
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475179
PURE UUID: 80370d6e-805e-4f95-8d69-f9e8750064ed
ORCID for Andrew Lotery: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-4305

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Mar 2023 17:49
Last modified: 16 Apr 2024 01:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Andrew Lotery ORCID iD
Author: Claire Bailey
Author: Usha Chakravarthy
Author: Bushra Mushtaq
Author: Geeta Menon
Author: James Stephen Talks

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×