The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults

Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults
Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults
Background: The validity of Actiwatch 2 in assessing sleep was evident, but its validity in assessing physical activity (PA) level was unknown. Research question: The objective of this study was to validate the wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X as a measurement of PA level against energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods: Twenty-seven university students aged 18–26 were recruited from July 2016 to May 2017. They were instructed to run at different speeds (4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 km/h) on a treadmill, each speed for 10 min. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production of the subjects was measured by indirect calorimetry using the Cosmed K4b 2 gas analyzer. Each subjects wore a single pair of accelerometers (Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X) on both wrists. Results: All the accelerometers were strongly correlated (ρ=0.83-0.94, all p-values <0.001), and all four accelerometers were strongly correlated with the METs obtained from the Cosmed K4b 2 (ρ=0.72-0.74, all p-values <0.001). Regression analysis showed that the non-dominant wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 cutoff cpm for moderate and vigorous PA were 399 and 1,404, respectively; for the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT the corresponding cutoffs were 4,514 and 15,044, respectively. The goodness-of-fit of the MET prediction equations were all >75%. When classifying the activities as either sedentary, light activity, moderate-intensity activity, or vigorous-intensity activity using the MET prediction equations, the agreements between the four accelerometers and that by the Cosmed K4b 2 were high, all AUCs were above 80% except those of the Actiwatch worn on the left (non-dominant) wrist. The Bland-Altman plots show that, for all four accelerometers, the biases were close to zero and error variances were largest when the mean measurements were around 6 METs. Significance: We showed that wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT were strongly correlated in PA assessment.
Accelerometry, Calibration, Cut-points, Measurement, Motion sensor, Physical activity
0966-6362
141-149
Lee, Paul
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Tse, C. Y.
22250af6-10f5-4443-b10e-e7dbba722306
Lee, Paul
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Tse, C. Y.
22250af6-10f5-4443-b10e-e7dbba722306

Lee, Paul and Tse, C. Y. (2019) Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults. Gait and Posture, 68 (2), 141-149. (doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The validity of Actiwatch 2 in assessing sleep was evident, but its validity in assessing physical activity (PA) level was unknown. Research question: The objective of this study was to validate the wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X as a measurement of PA level against energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry. Methods: Twenty-seven university students aged 18–26 were recruited from July 2016 to May 2017. They were instructed to run at different speeds (4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 km/h) on a treadmill, each speed for 10 min. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production of the subjects was measured by indirect calorimetry using the Cosmed K4b 2 gas analyzer. Each subjects wore a single pair of accelerometers (Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X) on both wrists. Results: All the accelerometers were strongly correlated (ρ=0.83-0.94, all p-values <0.001), and all four accelerometers were strongly correlated with the METs obtained from the Cosmed K4b 2 (ρ=0.72-0.74, all p-values <0.001). Regression analysis showed that the non-dominant wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 cutoff cpm for moderate and vigorous PA were 399 and 1,404, respectively; for the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT the corresponding cutoffs were 4,514 and 15,044, respectively. The goodness-of-fit of the MET prediction equations were all >75%. When classifying the activities as either sedentary, light activity, moderate-intensity activity, or vigorous-intensity activity using the MET prediction equations, the agreements between the four accelerometers and that by the Cosmed K4b 2 were high, all AUCs were above 80% except those of the Actiwatch worn on the left (non-dominant) wrist. The Bland-Altman plots show that, for all four accelerometers, the biases were close to zero and error variances were largest when the mean measurements were around 6 METs. Significance: We showed that wrist-worn Actiwatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT were strongly correlated in PA assessment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2019
Additional Information: Funding Information: The Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China provided financial support in the form of Health and Medical Research Fund (Ref 12131741 ). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: Accelerometry, Calibration, Cut-points, Measurement, Motion sensor, Physical activity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475349
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475349
ISSN: 0966-6362
PURE UUID: ab6a9f93-8b5b-4c71-a75e-ae8f7df52974
ORCID for Paul Lee: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-6450

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2023 17:49
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Lee ORCID iD
Author: C. Y. Tse

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×