The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Stability and change in political trust: evidence and implications from six panel studies

Stability and change in political trust: evidence and implications from six panel studies
Stability and change in political trust: evidence and implications from six panel studies
Are political attitudes a stable feature of individuals or a rational response to
changing circumstances and contexts? This question has long been a feature of
political science, and underpins our theories of how political attitudes are formed and what their consequences might be. In this paper, we explore this perennial question with a focus on the case of political trust, a fundamental indicator of democratic legitimacy and a long-standing topic of debate. Theoretically, we devise a framework that highlights how different theories of political trust assume different levels of stability or volatility, and the implications that this has for those theories and their normative consequences. Empirically, we study within-individual stability of political trust using six panel studies that cover five countries between 1965 and 2020. Our results consistently point to trust being stable in the long-term, with potential for short-term volatility in response to changing political contexts, and for substantial changes between people’s formative years and their adulthood. Even over a period of 19 years, most people’s responses to trust questions are remarkably similar between surveys, and significant life events such as unemployment and going to University do not significantly influence trust. Changes in the political environment, like incumbent government turnover, have larger effects but these appear to return to equilibrium in a few years. The exception to this general finding is individuals who are first surveyed when they are under the age of 18, who appear much more likely to change their trust levels in subsequent waves. Overall, our results complement previous research on attitude stability, indicating that trust is approximately as stable as other attitudes, such as towards immigration and redistribution. These findings have fundamental implications for our understanding of the nature of political trust and of attitude formation more broadly.
OSF Preprints
Devine, Daniel
6bfa5a27-1b58-4c61-8eb0-a7a40860a4ae
Valgarðsson, Viktor Orri
8f30ca41-f763-4cd2-9b08-1b4ff7ab27d9
Devine, Daniel
6bfa5a27-1b58-4c61-8eb0-a7a40860a4ae
Valgarðsson, Viktor Orri
8f30ca41-f763-4cd2-9b08-1b4ff7ab27d9

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Are political attitudes a stable feature of individuals or a rational response to
changing circumstances and contexts? This question has long been a feature of
political science, and underpins our theories of how political attitudes are formed and what their consequences might be. In this paper, we explore this perennial question with a focus on the case of political trust, a fundamental indicator of democratic legitimacy and a long-standing topic of debate. Theoretically, we devise a framework that highlights how different theories of political trust assume different levels of stability or volatility, and the implications that this has for those theories and their normative consequences. Empirically, we study within-individual stability of political trust using six panel studies that cover five countries between 1965 and 2020. Our results consistently point to trust being stable in the long-term, with potential for short-term volatility in response to changing political contexts, and for substantial changes between people’s formative years and their adulthood. Even over a period of 19 years, most people’s responses to trust questions are remarkably similar between surveys, and significant life events such as unemployment and going to University do not significantly influence trust. Changes in the political environment, like incumbent government turnover, have larger effects but these appear to return to equilibrium in a few years. The exception to this general finding is individuals who are first surveyed when they are under the age of 18, who appear much more likely to change their trust levels in subsequent waves. Overall, our results complement previous research on attitude stability, indicating that trust is approximately as stable as other attitudes, such as towards immigration and redistribution. These findings have fundamental implications for our understanding of the nature of political trust and of attitude formation more broadly.

Text
final_accepted - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 February 2023
Published date: 22 February 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475441
PURE UUID: 8bcc6f1e-3b51-46ce-9783-b586aafddb68
ORCID for Daniel Devine: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-1776
ORCID for Viktor Orri Valgarðsson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2891-7489

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Mar 2023 17:44
Last modified: 19 Jul 2023 01:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Devine ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×