The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel

Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel
Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel
Background: Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization). Aims: This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel. Methods: A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Results: Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7), general self-efficacy (MD =-9.8, 95% CI-13.6 to-6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17-25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up. Conclusions: The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.
Emotional outcomes, Ex-service personnel, Functional outcomes, Intervention, RCT
0962-7480
91-98
Thandi, G
084319b3-80bb-48dd-b94a-73b3be271bed
Phillips, Alexander
1814671f-9090-40b3-80da-69c89a66e37b
Greenberg, N
d925dcd0-fbb9-493d-9e9f-3c5bc15810b4
Maguire, Nicholas
ebc88e0a-3c1e-4b3a-88ac-e1dad740011b
Fear, N T
6fe53df5-e30f-46be-82d1-0ebb5543baa1
Thandi, G
084319b3-80bb-48dd-b94a-73b3be271bed
Phillips, Alexander
1814671f-9090-40b3-80da-69c89a66e37b
Greenberg, N
d925dcd0-fbb9-493d-9e9f-3c5bc15810b4
Maguire, Nicholas
ebc88e0a-3c1e-4b3a-88ac-e1dad740011b
Fear, N T
6fe53df5-e30f-46be-82d1-0ebb5543baa1

Thandi, G, Phillips, Alexander, Greenberg, N, Maguire, Nicholas and Fear, N T (2022) Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel. Occupational Medicine, 72 (2), 91-98. (doi:10.1093/occmed/kqab153).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization). Aims: This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel. Methods: A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Results: Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5-8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4-21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1-25.7), general self-efficacy (MD =-9.8, 95% CI-13.6 to-6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2-12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6-13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17-25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3-16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up. Conclusions: The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2 March 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Emotional outcomes, Ex-service personnel, Functional outcomes, Intervention, RCT

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475454
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475454
ISSN: 0962-7480
PURE UUID: 190fe8a1-4347-4c94-8eb3-1e8fea8e20eb
ORCID for Nicholas Maguire: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-8068

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Mar 2023 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G Thandi
Author: Alexander Phillips
Author: N Greenberg
Author: N T Fear

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×