Preconception health among migrant women in England: a cross-sectional analysis of maternity services data 2018-2019
Preconception health among migrant women in England: a cross-sectional analysis of maternity services data 2018-2019
BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes are poor among migrant women in vulnerable situations, but little is known about their health preconception. We investigated preconception health inequalities between migrant women in vulnerable situations and non-migrant women.
METHODS: This national cross-sectional study used data from the NHS Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) version 1.5, incorporating NHS maternity services in England. All 652,880 women with an antenatal booking appointment between 1/4/2018 and 31/3/2019 were included. Migration category data were available for 66.2 % (
n = 432,022). Odds ratios were calculated comparing preconception indicators among probable migrants in vulnerable situations (English not their first language with complex social factors (CSF)), probable migrants not in vulnerable situations (English not their first language without CSF), probable non-migrants in vulnerable situations (English their first language with CSF) and probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations (English their first language without CSF). CSF include recent migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, difficulty reading/speaking English; alcohol and/or drugs misuse; aged under 20; and/or experiencing domestic abuse.
FINDINGS: We identified 3.8 % (25,070 women) of the study population as probable migrants in vulnerable situations, 10.2 % (66,783 women) as probable migrants not in vulnerable situations, 5.6 % (36,433 women) as probable non-migrants in vulnerable situations, 46.5 % (303,737 women) as probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations, and 33.8 % as having missing migration category data. Probable migrants in vulnerable situations (
n = 25,070) had over twice the odds of not taking folic acid preconception compared to probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations (odds ratio 2.15, 95 % confidence interval 2.06-2.25). They had increased odds of previous obstetric complications and being underweight, but lower odds of physical and mental health conditions (apart from diabetes and hepatitis b), smoking and overweight or obesity.
INTERPRETATION: Inequalities exist across many preconception indicators, highlighting opportunities to improve preconception health in this population to reduce health inequalities and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
FUNDING: Medical Research Council.
Asylum seeker, Migration, Preconception health, Refugee, Reproductive health
McGranahan, Majel
3342167a-d806-4fa5-bad5-5d0c5791359c
Augarde, Elizabeth
7858b770-e36f-46ab-b410-4f42a2177e7d
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Duncan, Helen
f9117d83-10bf-487c-b953-e3a8f21f7417
Mann, Sue
364e6782-e510-426b-a623-0f9e60119986
Bick, Debra
18ec34f3-7e1b-47c6-a6e2-949a00bac1c6
Boardman, Felicity
5d93181d-50f3-4adf-9efc-fa7a9faff9d0
Oyebode, Oyinlola
f54b2c1a-6836-4774-b258-67cec53ae26e
2024
McGranahan, Majel
3342167a-d806-4fa5-bad5-5d0c5791359c
Augarde, Elizabeth
7858b770-e36f-46ab-b410-4f42a2177e7d
Schoenaker, Danielle
84b96b87-4070-45a5-9777-5a1e4e45e818
Duncan, Helen
f9117d83-10bf-487c-b953-e3a8f21f7417
Mann, Sue
364e6782-e510-426b-a623-0f9e60119986
Bick, Debra
18ec34f3-7e1b-47c6-a6e2-949a00bac1c6
Boardman, Felicity
5d93181d-50f3-4adf-9efc-fa7a9faff9d0
Oyebode, Oyinlola
f54b2c1a-6836-4774-b258-67cec53ae26e
McGranahan, Majel, Augarde, Elizabeth, Schoenaker, Danielle, Duncan, Helen, Mann, Sue, Bick, Debra, Boardman, Felicity and Oyebode, Oyinlola
(2024)
Preconception health among migrant women in England: a cross-sectional analysis of maternity services data 2018-2019.
Journal of Migration and Health, 10, [100250].
(doi:10.1101/2023.01.26.23284338).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes are poor among migrant women in vulnerable situations, but little is known about their health preconception. We investigated preconception health inequalities between migrant women in vulnerable situations and non-migrant women.
METHODS: This national cross-sectional study used data from the NHS Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) version 1.5, incorporating NHS maternity services in England. All 652,880 women with an antenatal booking appointment between 1/4/2018 and 31/3/2019 were included. Migration category data were available for 66.2 % (
n = 432,022). Odds ratios were calculated comparing preconception indicators among probable migrants in vulnerable situations (English not their first language with complex social factors (CSF)), probable migrants not in vulnerable situations (English not their first language without CSF), probable non-migrants in vulnerable situations (English their first language with CSF) and probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations (English their first language without CSF). CSF include recent migrants, asylum seekers, refugees, difficulty reading/speaking English; alcohol and/or drugs misuse; aged under 20; and/or experiencing domestic abuse.
FINDINGS: We identified 3.8 % (25,070 women) of the study population as probable migrants in vulnerable situations, 10.2 % (66,783 women) as probable migrants not in vulnerable situations, 5.6 % (36,433 women) as probable non-migrants in vulnerable situations, 46.5 % (303,737 women) as probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations, and 33.8 % as having missing migration category data. Probable migrants in vulnerable situations (
n = 25,070) had over twice the odds of not taking folic acid preconception compared to probable non-migrants not in vulnerable situations (odds ratio 2.15, 95 % confidence interval 2.06-2.25). They had increased odds of previous obstetric complications and being underweight, but lower odds of physical and mental health conditions (apart from diabetes and hepatitis b), smoking and overweight or obesity.
INTERPRETATION: Inequalities exist across many preconception indicators, highlighting opportunities to improve preconception health in this population to reduce health inequalities and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
FUNDING: Medical Research Council.
UNSPECIFIED
2023.01.26.23284338v1.full
- Author's Original
More information
In preparation date: 28 January 2023
Submitted date: 17 November 2023
Accepted/In Press date: 18 July 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 July 2024
Published date: 2024
Additional Information:
© 2024 The Author(s).
Keywords:
Asylum seeker, Migration, Preconception health, Refugee, Reproductive health
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 475532
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475532
ISSN: 2666-6235
PURE UUID: 52c84ac7-a83f-4605-b9bf-3fbd63cab9c3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Mar 2023 17:37
Last modified: 24 Oct 2024 01:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Majel McGranahan
Author:
Elizabeth Augarde
Author:
Helen Duncan
Author:
Sue Mann
Author:
Debra Bick
Author:
Felicity Boardman
Author:
Oyinlola Oyebode
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics