The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A cross-cultural comparison of mindful eating, cognitive distraction and episodic memory with BMI between the UK and China

A cross-cultural comparison of mindful eating, cognitive distraction and episodic memory with BMI between the UK and China
A cross-cultural comparison of mindful eating, cognitive distraction and episodic memory with BMI between the UK and China
Obesity rates are rising in many countries but prevalence varies widely. Cognitive controls of eating, such as mindful eating and episodic memory have been associated with a lower body mass index (BMI), whereas cognitive distraction has been associated with higher BMI. The objective of this study was to examine associations between cognitive controls of eating with BMI in the UK and China to investigate whether there are cross-cultural differences in these individualist and collectivist countries, respectively. Participants from the UK (n=126; mean age=30.6[s.d.=10.5]; mean BMI=25.80 [s.d.=6.54]; 76.2% female) and China (n=125; mean age=24.0[s.d.=7.5]; mean BMI=22.26[s.d.=4.62]; 74.4% female) completed measures of (i) mindful eating (Mindful eating questionnaire (MEQ) and Mindful eating inventory (MEI)), (ii) episodic memory (two bespoke measures), (iii) cognitive distraction (MEQ distraction subscale and three bespoke measures), and self-reported BMI (kg/m2) in an online survey (osf.io/zptxw). Multiple linear regression analyses segregated by country showed that MEI was negatively associated with BMI in the UK (β=-.34; 95%CI=-6.84, -.11; p<.05), whereas the MEQ distraction was positively associated with BMI in China (β=.28; 95%CI=.58, 4.27; p<.01). Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant cross-cultural differences in reported mindful eating (MEI: ηp2=.03; MEQ: ηp2=.05) and one measure of cognitive distraction (MEQ: ηp2=.06; bespoke measures: ηp2=.00), but not episodic memory (ηp2=.00). These findings suggest that there are meaningful cross-cultural differences in cognitive controls of eating and their relationship with BMI, but further validation of measures and replication in non-Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic (WEIRD) samples is necessary.
0195-6663
Hinton, Elanor C.
ad05bdf9-8bfc-46b4-8df0-9d1746043f26
Zhang, Qing
fc47edfd-1b82-4d15-876f-6d651a7f4617
Parfitt, Niamh
737e5dd7-2236-4453-b9f7-dbacb1ac84fc
Zou, Mengxuan
c3511a8c-20d7-4627-8b62-3cdea799f558
Ferriday, Danielle
663d14b1-0733-471f-8618-f77e58d60e7b
Hinton, Elanor C.
ad05bdf9-8bfc-46b4-8df0-9d1746043f26
Zhang, Qing
fc47edfd-1b82-4d15-876f-6d651a7f4617
Parfitt, Niamh
737e5dd7-2236-4453-b9f7-dbacb1ac84fc
Zou, Mengxuan
c3511a8c-20d7-4627-8b62-3cdea799f558
Ferriday, Danielle
663d14b1-0733-471f-8618-f77e58d60e7b

Hinton, Elanor C., Zhang, Qing, Parfitt, Niamh, Zou, Mengxuan and Ferriday, Danielle (2022) A cross-cultural comparison of mindful eating, cognitive distraction and episodic memory with BMI between the UK and China. Appetite, 179, [106209]. (doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106209).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Obesity rates are rising in many countries but prevalence varies widely. Cognitive controls of eating, such as mindful eating and episodic memory have been associated with a lower body mass index (BMI), whereas cognitive distraction has been associated with higher BMI. The objective of this study was to examine associations between cognitive controls of eating with BMI in the UK and China to investigate whether there are cross-cultural differences in these individualist and collectivist countries, respectively. Participants from the UK (n=126; mean age=30.6[s.d.=10.5]; mean BMI=25.80 [s.d.=6.54]; 76.2% female) and China (n=125; mean age=24.0[s.d.=7.5]; mean BMI=22.26[s.d.=4.62]; 74.4% female) completed measures of (i) mindful eating (Mindful eating questionnaire (MEQ) and Mindful eating inventory (MEI)), (ii) episodic memory (two bespoke measures), (iii) cognitive distraction (MEQ distraction subscale and three bespoke measures), and self-reported BMI (kg/m2) in an online survey (osf.io/zptxw). Multiple linear regression analyses segregated by country showed that MEI was negatively associated with BMI in the UK (β=-.34; 95%CI=-6.84, -.11; p<.05), whereas the MEQ distraction was positively associated with BMI in China (β=.28; 95%CI=.58, 4.27; p<.01). Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant cross-cultural differences in reported mindful eating (MEI: ηp2=.03; MEQ: ηp2=.05) and one measure of cognitive distraction (MEQ: ηp2=.06; bespoke measures: ηp2=.00), but not episodic memory (ηp2=.00). These findings suggest that there are meaningful cross-cultural differences in cognitive controls of eating and their relationship with BMI, but further validation of measures and replication in non-Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic (WEIRD) samples is necessary.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 10 September 2022
Published date: 1 December 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475823
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475823
ISSN: 0195-6663
PURE UUID: 47221bfb-30eb-4e01-aa92-5f042dd7cde7
ORCID for Mengxuan Zou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-6639

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Mar 2023 18:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Elanor C. Hinton
Author: Qing Zhang
Author: Niamh Parfitt
Author: Mengxuan Zou ORCID iD
Author: Danielle Ferriday

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×