How group deliberation affects individual distributional preferences: An experimental study
How group deliberation affects individual distributional preferences: An experimental study
We study experimentally the impact of group deliberation on individual distributional preferences. We elicit subjects' distributional preferences before and after group deliberation and estimate the relative weight of persuasion, social identity, and social comparison on the effect of deliberation. We find that 10 minutes of non-binding written group deliberation has a large effect on individual (private) distributional preferences. First, post-deliberation distributional preferences are more egalitarian than pre-deliberation preferences. Second, group polarization decreases after group deliberation. Finally, we find that social identity is the main but not unique driver of this effect. Persuasion and social comparison also impact individual preferences, particularly for subjects who are not monetarily affected by the distributive outcome. Our results bring novel insights for the elicitation of distributional preferences and the design of deliberative institutions.
Group deliberation, Distributional preferences, Social identity, Persuasion, Social comparison
Ferreira, João V.
0aad606a-eab0-473c-a230-9b3dfa2d7d93
Schokkaert, Erik
63623adc-0d08-4ff0-8c19-643288b32f1d
Tarroux, Benoît
3f76c7cb-5292-456f-b29c-cfbe3a43e77c
February 2023
Ferreira, João V.
0aad606a-eab0-473c-a230-9b3dfa2d7d93
Schokkaert, Erik
63623adc-0d08-4ff0-8c19-643288b32f1d
Tarroux, Benoît
3f76c7cb-5292-456f-b29c-cfbe3a43e77c
Ferreira, João V., Schokkaert, Erik and Tarroux, Benoît
(2023)
How group deliberation affects individual distributional preferences: An experimental study
GATE Lyon St-Étienne
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
We study experimentally the impact of group deliberation on individual distributional preferences. We elicit subjects' distributional preferences before and after group deliberation and estimate the relative weight of persuasion, social identity, and social comparison on the effect of deliberation. We find that 10 minutes of non-binding written group deliberation has a large effect on individual (private) distributional preferences. First, post-deliberation distributional preferences are more egalitarian than pre-deliberation preferences. Second, group polarization decreases after group deliberation. Finally, we find that social identity is the main but not unique driver of this effect. Persuasion and social comparison also impact individual preferences, particularly for subjects who are not monetarily affected by the distributive outcome. Our results bring novel insights for the elicitation of distributional preferences and the design of deliberative institutions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: February 2023
Keywords:
Group deliberation, Distributional preferences, Social identity, Persuasion, Social comparison
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 475829
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475829
PURE UUID: 4bce2d1c-d387-401f-85bb-3e1519e040f5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Mar 2023 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:57
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Erik Schokkaert
Author:
Benoît Tarroux
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics