The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effect of daily UVA phototherapy for 2 weeks on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in individuals with mild hypertension

The effect of daily UVA phototherapy for 2 weeks on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in individuals with mild hypertension
The effect of daily UVA phototherapy for 2 weeks on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in individuals with mild hypertension

Latitude and season determine exposure to ultraviolet radiation and correlate with population blood pressure. Evidence for Vitamin D causing this relationship is inconsistent, and temperature changes are only partly responsible for BP variation. In healthy individuals, a single irradiation with 20 J/cm2 UVA mobilises NO from cutaneous stores to the circulation, causes arterial vasodilatation, and elicits a transient fall in BP. We, therefore, tested whether low-dose daily UVA phototherapy might be an effective treatment for mild hypertension. 13 patients with untreated high-normal or stage 1 hypertension (BP 130-159/85-99 mm Hg), confirmed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), were recruited. Using home phototherapy lamps they were either exposed to 5 J/cm2 full body UVA (320-410 nm) radiation each day for 14 days, or sham-irradiated with lamps filtered to exclude wavelengths <500 nm. After a washout period of 3 ± 1 week, the alternate irradiation was delivered. 24-h ABP was measured on day 0 before either irradiation sequence and on day 14. Clinic BP was recorded on day 0, and within 90 min of irradiation on day 14. There was no effect on 24-h ABP following UVA irradiation. Clinic BP shortly after irradiation fell with UVA (-8.0 ± 2.9/-3.8 ± 1.1 mm Hg p = 0.034/0.029) but not sham irradiation (1.1 ± 3.0/0.9 ± 1.5 mm Hg). Once daily low-dose UVA does not control mildly elevated BP although it produces a transient fall shortly after irradiation. More frequent exposure to UVA might be effective. Alternatively, UVB, which photo-releases more NO from skin, could be tried.

0950-9240
Weller, Richard B
f78cfd69-d557-4fef-bd8d-28a90367feea
Macintyre, Iain M
57636fc3-a935-4687-b8aa-7599d17eb89d
Melville, Vanessa
f2a31b3e-3b51-4030-b29c-1b42aaf642cc
Farrugia, Michael
caa7996d-ed29-47e9-8380-055f84fbad6c
Feelisch, Martin
8c1b9965-8614-4e85-b2c6-458a2e17eafd
Webb, David J
0f5e6441-6bda-4c5f-839b-4a88999cb263
Weller, Richard B
f78cfd69-d557-4fef-bd8d-28a90367feea
Macintyre, Iain M
57636fc3-a935-4687-b8aa-7599d17eb89d
Melville, Vanessa
f2a31b3e-3b51-4030-b29c-1b42aaf642cc
Farrugia, Michael
caa7996d-ed29-47e9-8380-055f84fbad6c
Feelisch, Martin
8c1b9965-8614-4e85-b2c6-458a2e17eafd
Webb, David J
0f5e6441-6bda-4c5f-839b-4a88999cb263

Weller, Richard B, Macintyre, Iain M, Melville, Vanessa, Farrugia, Michael, Feelisch, Martin and Webb, David J (2022) The effect of daily UVA phototherapy for 2 weeks on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in individuals with mild hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension. (doi:10.1038/s41371-022-00729-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Latitude and season determine exposure to ultraviolet radiation and correlate with population blood pressure. Evidence for Vitamin D causing this relationship is inconsistent, and temperature changes are only partly responsible for BP variation. In healthy individuals, a single irradiation with 20 J/cm2 UVA mobilises NO from cutaneous stores to the circulation, causes arterial vasodilatation, and elicits a transient fall in BP. We, therefore, tested whether low-dose daily UVA phototherapy might be an effective treatment for mild hypertension. 13 patients with untreated high-normal or stage 1 hypertension (BP 130-159/85-99 mm Hg), confirmed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), were recruited. Using home phototherapy lamps they were either exposed to 5 J/cm2 full body UVA (320-410 nm) radiation each day for 14 days, or sham-irradiated with lamps filtered to exclude wavelengths <500 nm. After a washout period of 3 ± 1 week, the alternate irradiation was delivered. 24-h ABP was measured on day 0 before either irradiation sequence and on day 14. Clinic BP was recorded on day 0, and within 90 min of irradiation on day 14. There was no effect on 24-h ABP following UVA irradiation. Clinic BP shortly after irradiation fell with UVA (-8.0 ± 2.9/-3.8 ± 1.1 mm Hg p = 0.034/0.029) but not sham irradiation (1.1 ± 3.0/0.9 ± 1.5 mm Hg). Once daily low-dose UVA does not control mildly elevated BP although it produces a transient fall shortly after irradiation. More frequent exposure to UVA might be effective. Alternatively, UVB, which photo-releases more NO from skin, could be tried.

Text
s41371-022-00729-2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 August 2022
Additional Information: © 2022. The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475914
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475914
ISSN: 0950-9240
PURE UUID: 29c77d47-d95f-4cc8-84df-00922f59be77
ORCID for Martin Feelisch: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2320-1158

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2023 16:55
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard B Weller
Author: Iain M Macintyre
Author: Vanessa Melville
Author: Michael Farrugia
Author: Martin Feelisch ORCID iD
Author: David J Webb

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×