The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ultimate response and plastic design of aluminium alloy continuous beams

Ultimate response and plastic design of aluminium alloy continuous beams
Ultimate response and plastic design of aluminium alloy continuous beams
Over the last twenty years 6,000 series aluminium alloys are gaining increasing attention as a structural material in the construction sector, particularly in applications where lightness and corrosion resistance are crucial for material selection. Aiming to sustainable construction practices, significant material savings could be achieved through more economical design solutions such as plastic design. Currently, plastic design of aluminium alloy structures is not permitted in most design codes, except European provisions which provide recommendations for inelastic analysis. Indeed, there is a clear lack of experimental data to prove this possibility, particularly for relatively new materials in the construction industry, such as the 6082-Τ6 heat-treated aluminium alloy. To address this knowledge gap, a total of 15 rectangular hollow sections fabricated from 6082-T6 aluminium alloy were tested as simply-supported and two-span continuous beams. Numerical models were developed to replicate the experimental results considering geometric and material nonlinearities. A subsequent parametric study was carried out to generate numerical data for indeterminate structures. One normal and two high strength aluminium alloys as well as two load configurations were examined within this parametric study over a wide range of cross-sectional aspect ratios and slendernesses. The experimental results in combination with the numerical results were utilised to assess the accuracy and applicability of (i) the traditional plastic design method, (ii) the European design provisions (EC9), (iii) the plastic hinge method included in Annex H of EC9, and (iv) the Continuous Strength Method (CSM). Relative comparisons demonstrated the potential of applying plastic design in aluminium alloy indeterminate structures. Notably, the plastic hinge method and the CSM which accounts for strain hardening at the cross-sectional level and for moment redistribution at the system level were found to provide the most accurate design strength predictions, resulting in more economical cross-sections and utilising the full potential of aluminium alloys’ plastic deformability.
2352-0124
175-193
Georgantzia, Evangelia
915a67f2-6020-4bd3-919e-f6df11f4a031
Gkantou, Michaela
4c6dda4b-cccf-4531-9a76-34af1b69d189
Kamaris, George S.
8e3d13bc-634e-41d5-ab2e-6191d58b5e34
Kansara, Kunal D.
23eb9a5c-5cc0-4c92-a79a-2bbf2bce99d5
Georgantzia, Evangelia
915a67f2-6020-4bd3-919e-f6df11f4a031
Gkantou, Michaela
4c6dda4b-cccf-4531-9a76-34af1b69d189
Kamaris, George S.
8e3d13bc-634e-41d5-ab2e-6191d58b5e34
Kansara, Kunal D.
23eb9a5c-5cc0-4c92-a79a-2bbf2bce99d5

Georgantzia, Evangelia, Gkantou, Michaela, Kamaris, George S. and Kansara, Kunal D. (2022) Ultimate response and plastic design of aluminium alloy continuous beams. Structures, 39 (5), 175-193. (doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Over the last twenty years 6,000 series aluminium alloys are gaining increasing attention as a structural material in the construction sector, particularly in applications where lightness and corrosion resistance are crucial for material selection. Aiming to sustainable construction practices, significant material savings could be achieved through more economical design solutions such as plastic design. Currently, plastic design of aluminium alloy structures is not permitted in most design codes, except European provisions which provide recommendations for inelastic analysis. Indeed, there is a clear lack of experimental data to prove this possibility, particularly for relatively new materials in the construction industry, such as the 6082-Τ6 heat-treated aluminium alloy. To address this knowledge gap, a total of 15 rectangular hollow sections fabricated from 6082-T6 aluminium alloy were tested as simply-supported and two-span continuous beams. Numerical models were developed to replicate the experimental results considering geometric and material nonlinearities. A subsequent parametric study was carried out to generate numerical data for indeterminate structures. One normal and two high strength aluminium alloys as well as two load configurations were examined within this parametric study over a wide range of cross-sectional aspect ratios and slendernesses. The experimental results in combination with the numerical results were utilised to assess the accuracy and applicability of (i) the traditional plastic design method, (ii) the European design provisions (EC9), (iii) the plastic hinge method included in Annex H of EC9, and (iv) the Continuous Strength Method (CSM). Relative comparisons demonstrated the potential of applying plastic design in aluminium alloy indeterminate structures. Notably, the plastic hinge method and the CSM which accounts for strain hardening at the cross-sectional level and for moment redistribution at the system level were found to provide the most accurate design strength predictions, resulting in more economical cross-sections and utilising the full potential of aluminium alloys’ plastic deformability.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 March 2022
Published date: 1 May 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476228
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476228
ISSN: 2352-0124
PURE UUID: 290676ed-d6d3-40e7-97f3-434ec6abb842
ORCID for Evangelia Georgantzia: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-8236

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Apr 2023 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Evangelia Georgantzia ORCID iD
Author: Michaela Gkantou
Author: George S. Kamaris
Author: Kunal D. Kansara

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×