The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pressure distribution beneath the foot in sideslope walking

Pressure distribution beneath the foot in sideslope walking
Pressure distribution beneath the foot in sideslope walking
Dynamic loading profiles beneath the human foot during sideslope walking were determined and differences to level walking established. The contact area of the foot was measured, and the arch index derived from the footprint. Thirty healthy adults walked on a tillable walkway which had a polymer sensor pressure platform mounted at the mid-point. The sideways tilt could be adjusted in 2° increments from level to 8°. By walking in both directions on the sideslope, volunteers placed their right foot in either the upslope or downslope position. Loading profiles and contact areas were recorded for upslope and downslope foot placements at each angle of tilt.

The characteristics of the electrically resistive polymer sensors were determined prior to the walking trials. The sensor output was non-linear, mean within-sensor variation =3% (maximum 8%), mean hysteresis -9% (maximum 13%), pressure threshold sensitivity =35 kPa, and mean between-sensor variation =8% (maximum 18%) over the surface of the platform. The dynamic behaviour was reliable to 26Hz. The sensor was found to be sensitive to shear. The impact of this characteristic was assessed by comparison with a similar platform incorporating capacitive transducers that were not shear sensitive. The polymer sensor system indicated increased pressures beneath the heel with upslope foot placement, and similar increases beneath the central metatarsals with downslope placement. These features were not apparent in the profiles returned by the second platform. For both platforms, however, the first metatarsal showed increased pressures with downslope placement but decreased pressures with upslope placement. In addition, the initial contact time and duration of loading for the first metatarsal altered significantly. The contact area of the foot changed systematically with sideslope walking, such that the arch index increased with upslope placement and decreased with downslope placement.

This study demonstrated that the conventional approach of assessing level walking would fail to identify the increased foot pressures that occur on sideslopes. This may have crucial implications for ulceration risk assessment. The systematic changes in arch index and first metatarsal loading indicate that sideslope walking might be beneficial in revealing aspects of the mechanical behaviour of the human foot if combined with a simultaneous kinematic analysis. Potentially, the method offers a new approach to assessing the functional capacity of the foot for both clinical and research purposes.
University of Southampton
Urry, Stephen R.
c6b2e8bb-c9d3-49b2-94ee-826124be5c4e
Urry, Stephen R.
c6b2e8bb-c9d3-49b2-94ee-826124be5c4e
Turner, John
2d425775-e52f-4462-a7c4-5f3ea0980174

Urry, Stephen R. (2002) Pressure distribution beneath the foot in sideslope walking. University of Southampton, School of Engineering Sciences, Doctoral Thesis, 174pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Dynamic loading profiles beneath the human foot during sideslope walking were determined and differences to level walking established. The contact area of the foot was measured, and the arch index derived from the footprint. Thirty healthy adults walked on a tillable walkway which had a polymer sensor pressure platform mounted at the mid-point. The sideways tilt could be adjusted in 2° increments from level to 8°. By walking in both directions on the sideslope, volunteers placed their right foot in either the upslope or downslope position. Loading profiles and contact areas were recorded for upslope and downslope foot placements at each angle of tilt.

The characteristics of the electrically resistive polymer sensors were determined prior to the walking trials. The sensor output was non-linear, mean within-sensor variation =3% (maximum 8%), mean hysteresis -9% (maximum 13%), pressure threshold sensitivity =35 kPa, and mean between-sensor variation =8% (maximum 18%) over the surface of the platform. The dynamic behaviour was reliable to 26Hz. The sensor was found to be sensitive to shear. The impact of this characteristic was assessed by comparison with a similar platform incorporating capacitive transducers that were not shear sensitive. The polymer sensor system indicated increased pressures beneath the heel with upslope foot placement, and similar increases beneath the central metatarsals with downslope placement. These features were not apparent in the profiles returned by the second platform. For both platforms, however, the first metatarsal showed increased pressures with downslope placement but decreased pressures with upslope placement. In addition, the initial contact time and duration of loading for the first metatarsal altered significantly. The contact area of the foot changed systematically with sideslope walking, such that the arch index increased with upslope placement and decreased with downslope placement.

This study demonstrated that the conventional approach of assessing level walking would fail to identify the increased foot pressures that occur on sideslopes. This may have crucial implications for ulceration risk assessment. The systematic changes in arch index and first metatarsal loading indicate that sideslope walking might be beneficial in revealing aspects of the mechanical behaviour of the human foot if combined with a simultaneous kinematic analysis. Potentially, the method offers a new approach to assessing the functional capacity of the foot for both clinical and research purposes.

Text
00202230 - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (24MB)

More information

Published date: 2002
Organisations: University of Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 47624
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/47624
PURE UUID: 8b7acfa6-93c3-4754-b46a-1920c90c3660

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stephen R. Urry
Thesis advisor: John Turner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×