The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gestational weight gain in the REVAMP pregnancy cohort in Western India: comparison with international and national references

Gestational weight gain in the REVAMP pregnancy cohort in Western India: comparison with international and national references
Gestational weight gain in the REVAMP pregnancy cohort in Western India: comparison with international and national references

Objective: to determine the trimester specific gestational weight gain (GWG) in a population of pregnant women from Western India and compare it with the Intergrowth-21st international and an Indian reference (GARBH-Ini cohort-Group for Advanced Research on BirtH outcomes).

Study design: a prospective longitudinal observational study was undertaken in Pune, West India and data for gestational weight gain was collected [the REVAMP study (Research Exploring Various Aspects and Mechanisms in Preeclampsia)]. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape method (GAMLSS model) were used to create GWG centile curves according to gestational age, stratified by BMI at recruitment (n = 640) and compared with Intergrowth-21st reference and GARBH-Ini cohort. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between GWG and antenatal risk factors.

Results: the median GWG was 1.68, 5.80, 7.06, and 11.56 kg at gestational ages 18, 26, 30, and 40 weeks, respectively. In our study, pregnant women gained less weight throughout pregnancy compared to Intergrowth-21st study, but more weight compared to the GARBH-Ini cohort centile curves in all the BMI categories. GWG in overweight/obese women (BMI ≥ 25) was significantly lower (<0.001) as compared to underweight (BMI < 18.5), or normal weight women (BMI ≥ 18.5 and <25). The median GWG at 40 weeks in underweight, normal and overweight/obese women was 13.18, 11.74, and 10.48 kg, respectively. Higher maternal BMI, older maternal age, higher parity and higher hemoglobin concentrations were associated with lower GWG, while taller maternal height was associated with greater GWG.

Conclusion: GWG of Indian women is lower than the prescriptive standards of the Intergrowth charts.

2296-858X
Dangat, Kamini
6f67775d-72e6-4dac-baa1-39e300a18918
Gupte, Sanjay
a912ce2c-a6f0-46fb-b5c6-398db8eadfd7
Wagh, Girija
b3c1c7f3-5ee6-45d0-9c62-ed914739295d
Lalwani, Sanjay
95b1df54-f8f9-417c-ac49-e4651a6e6a8d
Randhir, Karuna
1a71f1e4-0a52-4986-87bb-d3a20c09ecbb
Madiwale, Shweta
d9801fa0-272b-4409-8b23-76a48311d9bf
Pisal, Hemlata
45db3cfe-4de3-4fec-a3c4-ba4c0d245f2b
Kadam, Vrushali
1a726a6a-ba7f-4a78-bc09-7acb5b48b76a
Gundu, Shridevi
80ee9a87-a91b-44ce-b681-efdfc854cfd1
Chandhiok, Nomita
796fd51a-e159-43b6-b71d-e3ed35767ab3
Kulkarni, Bharati
a2ced934-f432-446e-bb36-71b49833c6b4
Joshi, Sadhana
40f08f3b-bfdf-4b1b-8f0e-5078bb122de2
Fall, Caroline
7171a105-34f5-4131-89d7-1aa639893b18
Sachdev, Harshpal Singh
2fca6c24-2750-47b4-b675-7c7da6e5c987
Dangat, Kamini
6f67775d-72e6-4dac-baa1-39e300a18918
Gupte, Sanjay
a912ce2c-a6f0-46fb-b5c6-398db8eadfd7
Wagh, Girija
b3c1c7f3-5ee6-45d0-9c62-ed914739295d
Lalwani, Sanjay
95b1df54-f8f9-417c-ac49-e4651a6e6a8d
Randhir, Karuna
1a71f1e4-0a52-4986-87bb-d3a20c09ecbb
Madiwale, Shweta
d9801fa0-272b-4409-8b23-76a48311d9bf
Pisal, Hemlata
45db3cfe-4de3-4fec-a3c4-ba4c0d245f2b
Kadam, Vrushali
1a726a6a-ba7f-4a78-bc09-7acb5b48b76a
Gundu, Shridevi
80ee9a87-a91b-44ce-b681-efdfc854cfd1
Chandhiok, Nomita
796fd51a-e159-43b6-b71d-e3ed35767ab3
Kulkarni, Bharati
a2ced934-f432-446e-bb36-71b49833c6b4
Joshi, Sadhana
40f08f3b-bfdf-4b1b-8f0e-5078bb122de2
Fall, Caroline
7171a105-34f5-4131-89d7-1aa639893b18
Sachdev, Harshpal Singh
2fca6c24-2750-47b4-b675-7c7da6e5c987

Dangat, Kamini, Gupte, Sanjay, Wagh, Girija, Lalwani, Sanjay, Randhir, Karuna, Madiwale, Shweta, Pisal, Hemlata, Kadam, Vrushali, Gundu, Shridevi, Chandhiok, Nomita, Kulkarni, Bharati, Joshi, Sadhana, Fall, Caroline and Sachdev, Harshpal Singh (2022) Gestational weight gain in the REVAMP pregnancy cohort in Western India: comparison with international and national references. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, [1022990]. (doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1022990).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to determine the trimester specific gestational weight gain (GWG) in a population of pregnant women from Western India and compare it with the Intergrowth-21st international and an Indian reference (GARBH-Ini cohort-Group for Advanced Research on BirtH outcomes).

Study design: a prospective longitudinal observational study was undertaken in Pune, West India and data for gestational weight gain was collected [the REVAMP study (Research Exploring Various Aspects and Mechanisms in Preeclampsia)]. Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape method (GAMLSS model) were used to create GWG centile curves according to gestational age, stratified by BMI at recruitment (n = 640) and compared with Intergrowth-21st reference and GARBH-Ini cohort. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between GWG and antenatal risk factors.

Results: the median GWG was 1.68, 5.80, 7.06, and 11.56 kg at gestational ages 18, 26, 30, and 40 weeks, respectively. In our study, pregnant women gained less weight throughout pregnancy compared to Intergrowth-21st study, but more weight compared to the GARBH-Ini cohort centile curves in all the BMI categories. GWG in overweight/obese women (BMI ≥ 25) was significantly lower (<0.001) as compared to underweight (BMI < 18.5), or normal weight women (BMI ≥ 18.5 and <25). The median GWG at 40 weeks in underweight, normal and overweight/obese women was 13.18, 11.74, and 10.48 kg, respectively. Higher maternal BMI, older maternal age, higher parity and higher hemoglobin concentrations were associated with lower GWG, while taller maternal height was associated with greater GWG.

Conclusion: GWG of Indian women is lower than the prescriptive standards of the Intergrowth charts.

Text
fmed-09-1022990 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 September 2022
Published date: 5 October 2022
Additional Information: Copyright © 2022 Dangat, Gupte, Wagh, Lalwani, Randhir, Madiwale, Pisal, Kadam, Gundu, Chandhiok, Kulkarni, Joshi, Fall and Sachdev.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476285
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476285
ISSN: 2296-858X
PURE UUID: a9454df0-6801-445b-8f53-a9c87f94a453
ORCID for Caroline Fall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-5552

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Apr 2023 16:46
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kamini Dangat
Author: Sanjay Gupte
Author: Girija Wagh
Author: Sanjay Lalwani
Author: Karuna Randhir
Author: Shweta Madiwale
Author: Hemlata Pisal
Author: Vrushali Kadam
Author: Shridevi Gundu
Author: Nomita Chandhiok
Author: Bharati Kulkarni
Author: Sadhana Joshi
Author: Caroline Fall ORCID iD
Author: Harshpal Singh Sachdev

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×