Policy instruments for educational governance: a comparative investigation of India and China
Policy instruments for educational governance: a comparative investigation of India and China
As the emphasis of education reforms around the world has increasingly shifted from expanding schooling access to improving student learning outcomes, the policy instruments used in educational governance has accordingly proliferated in order to fulfill this more complicated and challenging policy goal. Despite a growing body of knowledge on various specific instruments, there lacks a synthesized picture with which to inform a systematic understanding of the broad range of policy instruments being deployed, how they function, and with what impact. To fill the gap, this chapter applies Christopher Hood’s NATO framework to comparatively examine the informational, regulatory, fiscal, and organizational instruments used in India and China, countries with two of the largest basic education sectors in the world. The results show that while each of the four key resources (nodality, authority, treasure, and organization) have been actively mobilized, the configuration of individual instruments, and therefore the full policy portfolio, can be markedly different in the two systems. This digested knowledge provides a timely stock-taking of a scattered empirical literature, which also serves as a valuable starting point for future research to advance the understanding of instrument choice and policy effectiveness.
1-25
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
16 November 2022
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
Yan, Yifei
(2022)
Policy instruments for educational governance: a comparative investigation of India and China.
In,
Lee, Wing On, Brown, Phillip, Goodwin, A Lin and Green, Andy
(eds.)
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific.
Springer, .
(doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_98-1).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
As the emphasis of education reforms around the world has increasingly shifted from expanding schooling access to improving student learning outcomes, the policy instruments used in educational governance has accordingly proliferated in order to fulfill this more complicated and challenging policy goal. Despite a growing body of knowledge on various specific instruments, there lacks a synthesized picture with which to inform a systematic understanding of the broad range of policy instruments being deployed, how they function, and with what impact. To fill the gap, this chapter applies Christopher Hood’s NATO framework to comparatively examine the informational, regulatory, fiscal, and organizational instruments used in India and China, countries with two of the largest basic education sectors in the world. The results show that while each of the four key resources (nodality, authority, treasure, and organization) have been actively mobilized, the configuration of individual instruments, and therefore the full policy portfolio, can be markedly different in the two systems. This digested knowledge provides a timely stock-taking of a scattered empirical literature, which also serves as a valuable starting point for future research to advance the understanding of instrument choice and policy effectiveness.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 16 November 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 476298
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476298
PURE UUID: 078143ff-f049-46fc-aa85-3c20dea7907c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Apr 2023 17:26
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yifei Yan
Editor:
Wing On Lee
Editor:
Phillip Brown
Editor:
A Lin Goodwin
Editor:
Andy Green
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics