The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interrogating the failed probation experiment, or it wasn't broken, so why did they try to fix it?

Interrogating the failed probation experiment, or it wasn't broken, so why did they try to fix it?
Interrogating the failed probation experiment, or it wasn't broken, so why did they try to fix it?
With private companies predators rather than partners and the Probation Service particularly vulnerable to the vagaries of successive governments’ forays into privatisation, in a series of incremental changes, the Probation Service was progressively softened up for ‘selling off’ to the private sector. This chapters focuses exclusively on the balkanisation of the Probation Service, with the majority of community sentences and rehabilitation packaged off and outsourced to the private sector through the policy of transforming rehabilitation. With the ‘new’ National Probation Service marginalised, reduced to initial risk assessment, advising courts on sentencing options and the direct management of convicted lawbreakers deemed ‘high risk’, the various steps involved in turning the policy vision into a programme of action from consultation, to green papers, to bills and enacted legislation, and its humiliating reversal after a mere four years of operation, are traced.

Charting the resistance by penal reformers, trade unionists and parliamentary allies; the concerns and warnings issued by opponents during the consultation stage; and the series of excoriating reports compiled by government watch-dogs during the period of its implementation, the authors explore how the short-lived failed experiment of outsourcing the delivery of low- to medium-risk offenders, driven by ideological dogmatism, political hubris and austerity underfunding, transformed a first-class service into one ‘not fit for purpose’: a disastrous development that ultimately forced the Ministry of Justice to abandon the project, with the announcement of a partial U-turn in 2019, followed a year later by total U-turn, removing the private sector from the delivery of all core aspects of the provision of probation services.
256-285
Routledge
Hamerton, Christopher
49e79eba-521a-4bea-ae10-af7f2f852210
Hobbs, Suzanne
0c856978-b2ca-418b-89e7-98d666e0a137
Hamerton, Christopher
49e79eba-521a-4bea-ae10-af7f2f852210
Hobbs, Suzanne
0c856978-b2ca-418b-89e7-98d666e0a137

Hamerton, Christopher and Hobbs, Suzanne (2022) Interrogating the failed probation experiment, or it wasn't broken, so why did they try to fix it? In, Privatising Criminal Justice: History, Neoliberal Penality and the Commodification of Crime. 1st ed. Abingdon. Routledge, pp. 256-285. (doi:10.4324/9781315709819-11).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

With private companies predators rather than partners and the Probation Service particularly vulnerable to the vagaries of successive governments’ forays into privatisation, in a series of incremental changes, the Probation Service was progressively softened up for ‘selling off’ to the private sector. This chapters focuses exclusively on the balkanisation of the Probation Service, with the majority of community sentences and rehabilitation packaged off and outsourced to the private sector through the policy of transforming rehabilitation. With the ‘new’ National Probation Service marginalised, reduced to initial risk assessment, advising courts on sentencing options and the direct management of convicted lawbreakers deemed ‘high risk’, the various steps involved in turning the policy vision into a programme of action from consultation, to green papers, to bills and enacted legislation, and its humiliating reversal after a mere four years of operation, are traced.

Charting the resistance by penal reformers, trade unionists and parliamentary allies; the concerns and warnings issued by opponents during the consultation stage; and the series of excoriating reports compiled by government watch-dogs during the period of its implementation, the authors explore how the short-lived failed experiment of outsourcing the delivery of low- to medium-risk offenders, driven by ideological dogmatism, political hubris and austerity underfunding, transformed a first-class service into one ‘not fit for purpose’: a disastrous development that ultimately forced the Ministry of Justice to abandon the project, with the announcement of a partial U-turn in 2019, followed a year later by total U-turn, removing the private sector from the delivery of all core aspects of the provision of probation services.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 30 September 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476448
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476448
PURE UUID: 422af37b-e0d6-4a07-a98b-2a84b9fc34fa
ORCID for Christopher Hamerton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-2378

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2023 15:10
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Suzanne Hobbs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×