The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Constructing ‘indigenous people’ reproducing coloniality’s epistemic violence: a content analysis of the U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report

Constructing ‘indigenous people’ reproducing coloniality’s epistemic violence: a content analysis of the U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report
Constructing ‘indigenous people’ reproducing coloniality’s epistemic violence: a content analysis of the U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report
This chapter interrogates the knowledge production process embedded in global anti-trafficking policy initiatives, as reflected in the annual U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report (TIPR). Using the conceptual framework of coloniality, we undertake content analysis of the TIPRs 2001-2020. We show that policy interventions are still central in imposing colonial frameworks of knowledge and interventions globally and locally. Three main findings emerge from the content analysis: firstly, the references to ‘indigenous communities’ and ‘indigenous victims’ have been amplified over time. Specifically, from 2003 onwards there is a gradual but clear trend towards more of these references appearing in each subsequent iteration of the Report. Thus, there is a shift from a state of silence towards both wider visibility and labelling Indigenous victims of trafficking as extremely vulnerable. Secondly, these references portray Indigenous communities and individuals in relation to human trafficking as either ‘at risk’, ‘at high risk’, ‘particularly vulnerable’ or ‘most vulnerable’. While Indigenous victimisation is becoming more visible, in most instances the problem is framed as human traffickers preying on individual victims or on certain communities, rather than recognising how the continuous impact of the colonial matrix of power (i.e. coloniality) permeates Indigenous lives including their victimisation. Thirdly, there is a clear geographical clustering around the regions of Central Africa, Central and South America, and also Southeast Asia, which reflects global imperial hierarchies of power. Based on our findings we argue that the reports are infused with colonial systems of thought, which inflict and reproduce epistemic violence and colonial relations of power locally and internationally.
coloniality, human tafficking, US TIP Report
Bristol University Press
Boukli, Avi
4a3963f7-7d82-485b-889b-a7cb7ae11888
Papanicolaou, Georgios
1b178c67-a66f-4615-bde3-fbdd5984492a
Dimou, Eleni
9ec88d70-175e-493d-b0db-436824081f40
Faulkner, Elizabeth
Boukli, Avi
4a3963f7-7d82-485b-889b-a7cb7ae11888
Papanicolaou, Georgios
1b178c67-a66f-4615-bde3-fbdd5984492a
Dimou, Eleni
9ec88d70-175e-493d-b0db-436824081f40
Faulkner, Elizabeth

Boukli, Avi, Papanicolaou, Georgios and Dimou, Eleni (2023) Constructing ‘indigenous people’ reproducing coloniality’s epistemic violence: a content analysis of the U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report. In, Faulkner, Elizabeth (ed.) Modern Slavery in the Global Context. Bristol. Bristol University Press. (In Press)

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter interrogates the knowledge production process embedded in global anti-trafficking policy initiatives, as reflected in the annual U.S. Trafficking in Persons Report (TIPR). Using the conceptual framework of coloniality, we undertake content analysis of the TIPRs 2001-2020. We show that policy interventions are still central in imposing colonial frameworks of knowledge and interventions globally and locally. Three main findings emerge from the content analysis: firstly, the references to ‘indigenous communities’ and ‘indigenous victims’ have been amplified over time. Specifically, from 2003 onwards there is a gradual but clear trend towards more of these references appearing in each subsequent iteration of the Report. Thus, there is a shift from a state of silence towards both wider visibility and labelling Indigenous victims of trafficking as extremely vulnerable. Secondly, these references portray Indigenous communities and individuals in relation to human trafficking as either ‘at risk’, ‘at high risk’, ‘particularly vulnerable’ or ‘most vulnerable’. While Indigenous victimisation is becoming more visible, in most instances the problem is framed as human traffickers preying on individual victims or on certain communities, rather than recognising how the continuous impact of the colonial matrix of power (i.e. coloniality) permeates Indigenous lives including their victimisation. Thirdly, there is a clear geographical clustering around the regions of Central Africa, Central and South America, and also Southeast Asia, which reflects global imperial hierarchies of power. Based on our findings we argue that the reports are infused with colonial systems of thought, which inflict and reproduce epistemic violence and colonial relations of power locally and internationally.

Text
Chapter 7 MSGC. Boukli. Papanicolaou. Dimou - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 April 2023
Keywords: coloniality, human tafficking, US TIP Report

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476496
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476496
PURE UUID: a84edc26-21e3-4764-b45b-66fc48080cda
ORCID for Avi Boukli: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-1664

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 May 2023 16:47
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:14

Export record

Contributors

Author: Avi Boukli ORCID iD
Author: Georgios Papanicolaou
Author: Eleni Dimou
Editor: Elizabeth Faulkner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×