Heidegger, being, and all that is and is so: on paradoxes, and questions, of being
Heidegger, being, and all that is and is so: on paradoxes, and questions, of being
A number of readings of the work of Martin Heidegger have emerged recently that place at its heart what has been labeled a "paradox of being." We find these readings in the work of Filippo Casati, Adrian Moore, Graham Priest, and Edward Witherspoon, though related themes can be traced earlier in work by Daniel Dahlstrom. The approach that these readings take poses new and interesting questions of Heidegger’s texts – some of these commentators arguing, for example, that the paradox they identify calls for a radical change in our understanding of logic – as well as contributing to a revival of interest in "the question of being." This chapter argues that these readers are right to point to a "paradox of being" in Heidegger’s work and to stress the importance of that "question"; but it raises questions about how they do this. The first half of the chapter examines critically the "paradox of being" that these readings identify, and the basis upon which they believe it rests. The second half of the chapter argues that a "paradox of being" does indeed emerge in Heidegger’s work, but it is rather different in character, is more pressing – because it rests on sounder foundations – and becomes visible only when we examine more closely precisely which "question of being" it is that is at stake in Heidegger’s work.
133-158
Cambridge University Press
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24
15 September 2022
Mcmanus, Denis
95bb0718-d3fa-4982-9cde-05ac00b5bb24
Mcmanus, Denis
(2022)
Heidegger, being, and all that is and is so: on paradoxes, and questions, of being.
In,
Casati, Filippo and Dahlstrom, Daniel
(eds.)
Heidegger on Logic.
Cambridge University Press, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
A number of readings of the work of Martin Heidegger have emerged recently that place at its heart what has been labeled a "paradox of being." We find these readings in the work of Filippo Casati, Adrian Moore, Graham Priest, and Edward Witherspoon, though related themes can be traced earlier in work by Daniel Dahlstrom. The approach that these readings take poses new and interesting questions of Heidegger’s texts – some of these commentators arguing, for example, that the paradox they identify calls for a radical change in our understanding of logic – as well as contributing to a revival of interest in "the question of being." This chapter argues that these readers are right to point to a "paradox of being" in Heidegger’s work and to stress the importance of that "question"; but it raises questions about how they do this. The first half of the chapter examines critically the "paradox of being" that these readings identify, and the basis upon which they believe it rests. The second half of the chapter argues that a "paradox of being" does indeed emerge in Heidegger’s work, but it is rather different in character, is more pressing – because it rests on sounder foundations – and becomes visible only when we examine more closely precisely which "question of being" it is that is at stake in Heidegger’s work.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 15 September 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 476609
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476609
PURE UUID: 290e82ef-d38c-4ae4-aa6a-1338f8d0098e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 May 2023 10:54
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 01:36
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Filippo Casati
Editor:
Daniel Dahlstrom
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics