The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using particle size distributions to fingerprint suspended sediment sources—Evaluation at laboratory and catchment scales

Using particle size distributions to fingerprint suspended sediment sources—Evaluation at laboratory and catchment scales
Using particle size distributions to fingerprint suspended sediment sources—Evaluation at laboratory and catchment scales

Applications of sediment source fingerprinting studies are growing globally despite the high costs and workloads associated with the analyses of conventional fingerprint properties on target sediment samples collected using traditional methods. To this end, there is a need to test new fingerprint properties that can overcome these challenges. Sediment particle size could potentially contribute here since it is relatively easy to measure but, until now, has rarely been deployed as a fingerprint itself. Instead, particle size has been used to ensure that source and target sediment samples are more directly comparable on the basis of the fingerprints used. Accordingly, this work examined whether particle size distributions (PSDs) could be used as a reliable fingerprint for apportioning sediment sources, in combination with a grain size un-mixing model. Application of PSDs as a fingerprint was tested at two scales: (i) in a laboratory setting where soil samples with known PSDs were used to generate artificial mixtures to evaluate un-mixing model results, and (ii) a catchment setting comparing PSDs in a confluence-based approach to test if downstream target sediment PSDs could be un-mixed into the contributions of sediment coming from an upstream and a tributary sampling site. Laboratory results showed that the known proportions of the two, three and four soil samples in the artificial mixtures were predicted accurately using the AnalySize grain size un-mixing model, giving average absolute errors of 9%, 8% and 6%, respectively. Catchment results showed variable performances when comparing un-mixing results with sediment budget estimations, with the best results obtained at higher discharge values during storm runoff events. Overall, our results suggest the potential of using PSDs for estimating contributions of sediment sources delivering SS with distinct PSDs when sources are located at short distance to the downstream sampling site.
1099-1085
Lake, Niels F.
95d30a98-c623-4bf9-a4f7-7117fd76e231
Martínez‐carreras, Núria
e7e77012-3001-403b-a40b-7b1f56c29d49
Shaw, Peter J.
dcb6c9af-bf38-4dfe-8395-8aeac2ad5cc7
Collins, Adrian L.
700e5f6a-4de3-4406-ad7a-d9d8ec0a5069
Lake, Niels F.
95d30a98-c623-4bf9-a4f7-7117fd76e231
Martínez‐carreras, Núria
e7e77012-3001-403b-a40b-7b1f56c29d49
Shaw, Peter J.
dcb6c9af-bf38-4dfe-8395-8aeac2ad5cc7
Collins, Adrian L.
700e5f6a-4de3-4406-ad7a-d9d8ec0a5069

Lake, Niels F., Martínez‐carreras, Núria, Shaw, Peter J. and Collins, Adrian L. (2022) Using particle size distributions to fingerprint suspended sediment sources—Evaluation at laboratory and catchment scales. Hydrological Processes, 36 (10). (doi:10.1002/hyp.14726).

Record type: Article

Abstract


Applications of sediment source fingerprinting studies are growing globally despite the high costs and workloads associated with the analyses of conventional fingerprint properties on target sediment samples collected using traditional methods. To this end, there is a need to test new fingerprint properties that can overcome these challenges. Sediment particle size could potentially contribute here since it is relatively easy to measure but, until now, has rarely been deployed as a fingerprint itself. Instead, particle size has been used to ensure that source and target sediment samples are more directly comparable on the basis of the fingerprints used. Accordingly, this work examined whether particle size distributions (PSDs) could be used as a reliable fingerprint for apportioning sediment sources, in combination with a grain size un-mixing model. Application of PSDs as a fingerprint was tested at two scales: (i) in a laboratory setting where soil samples with known PSDs were used to generate artificial mixtures to evaluate un-mixing model results, and (ii) a catchment setting comparing PSDs in a confluence-based approach to test if downstream target sediment PSDs could be un-mixed into the contributions of sediment coming from an upstream and a tributary sampling site. Laboratory results showed that the known proportions of the two, three and four soil samples in the artificial mixtures were predicted accurately using the AnalySize grain size un-mixing model, giving average absolute errors of 9%, 8% and 6%, respectively. Catchment results showed variable performances when comparing un-mixing results with sediment budget estimations, with the best results obtained at higher discharge values during storm runoff events. Overall, our results suggest the potential of using PSDs for estimating contributions of sediment sources delivering SS with distinct PSDs when sources are located at short distance to the downstream sampling site.

Text
Hydrological Processes - 2022 - Lake - Using particle size distributions to fingerprint suspended sediment sources - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 September 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 October 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476762
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476762
ISSN: 1099-1085
PURE UUID: 72f8bef6-4705-4af1-a89b-ed66788ce432
ORCID for Niels F. Lake: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-2005
ORCID for Peter J. Shaw: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-1069

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 May 2023 16:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 01:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Niels F. Lake ORCID iD
Author: Núria Martínez‐carreras
Author: Peter J. Shaw ORCID iD
Author: Adrian L. Collins

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×