A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents of children
A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents of children
Background
Many community-based interventions have been developed to increase parent/caregiver health literacy, yet no systematic review of their effectiveness has been published. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of community-based health literacy interventions in improving the health literacy of parents/caregivers.
Methods
A systematic review of six databases; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Education Source were conducted to identify relevant articles. Risk of bias were assessed using version two of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials or the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions. The study findings were grouped and synthesised following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework.
Results
Eleven community-based health literacy interventions for parents/caregivers were identified. Study design included randomised controlled trials (n = 4), non-randomised studies with comparison group (n = 4), and non-randomised studies without a comparison group (n = 3). Interventions were delivered digitally, in person or a combination of the two. The main findings of the studies showed some potential for both in person and digital interventions to increase parental health literacy. The risk of bias was high in over half the studies (n = 7) Studies were heterogeneous preventing a meta-analysis.
Discussion
Although no definitive conclusion of the effectiveness of community-based interventions can be drawn there are suggestions of improvement in many of the studies included in this review. The review has brought into question whether the health literacy measurement tools used met the needs of assessing the interventions outcomes. When comparing the cost and resources needed for digital with in person interventions, the findings of this review have implications for both practise and research.
Key messages
Methodologically stronger primary research, informed by theory, is needed to capture the components of effective health literacy intervention for parents.
Researchers in the field of health literacy need to consider the suitability of using screening tools to measure change in health literacy post intervention.
Husted, Margaret
21af4875-9939-4653-a5c2-f210f2ccc4c7
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Patel, Sanjay
4ea4db7c-bf45-41af-8d57-4e925f24474c
Faulkner, James
16a65aac-bf2d-45ef-80c5-d70fbc3d7bfc
Husted, Margaret
21af4875-9939-4653-a5c2-f210f2ccc4c7
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Patel, Sanjay
4ea4db7c-bf45-41af-8d57-4e925f24474c
Faulkner, James
16a65aac-bf2d-45ef-80c5-d70fbc3d7bfc
Husted, Margaret, Fraser, Simon, Patel, Sanjay and Faulkner, James
(2022)
A systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based interventions aimed at improving health literacy of parents of children.
Perspectives in Public Health.
(doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.143).
Abstract
Background
Many community-based interventions have been developed to increase parent/caregiver health literacy, yet no systematic review of their effectiveness has been published. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of community-based health literacy interventions in improving the health literacy of parents/caregivers.
Methods
A systematic review of six databases; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Education Source were conducted to identify relevant articles. Risk of bias were assessed using version two of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials or the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions. The study findings were grouped and synthesised following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework.
Results
Eleven community-based health literacy interventions for parents/caregivers were identified. Study design included randomised controlled trials (n = 4), non-randomised studies with comparison group (n = 4), and non-randomised studies without a comparison group (n = 3). Interventions were delivered digitally, in person or a combination of the two. The main findings of the studies showed some potential for both in person and digital interventions to increase parental health literacy. The risk of bias was high in over half the studies (n = 7) Studies were heterogeneous preventing a meta-analysis.
Discussion
Although no definitive conclusion of the effectiveness of community-based interventions can be drawn there are suggestions of improvement in many of the studies included in this review. The review has brought into question whether the health literacy measurement tools used met the needs of assessing the interventions outcomes. When comparing the cost and resources needed for digital with in person interventions, the findings of this review have implications for both practise and research.
Key messages
Methodologically stronger primary research, informed by theory, is needed to capture the components of effective health literacy intervention for parents.
Researchers in the field of health literacy need to consider the suitability of using screening tools to measure change in health literacy post intervention.
Text
PiPH_manuscript_V5 (003)
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 April 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 October 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 476811
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476811
ISSN: 1757-9147
PURE UUID: 37e48c7c-038b-462f-a061-3a0f51d53732
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2023 16:59
Last modified: 30 Apr 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Margaret Husted
Author:
Sanjay Patel
Author:
James Faulkner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics