The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study

Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
Background: various washout policies are widely used in adults living with long-term catheters (LTC). There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefits and potential harms of prophylactic LTC washout policies in the prevention of blockages and other LTC-related adverse events, such as urinary tract infections. CATHETER II tests the hypothesis that weekly prophylactic LTC washouts (normal saline or citric acid) in addition to standard LTC care reduce the incidence of catheter blockage requiring intervention compared to standard LTC care only in adults living with LTC.

Methods: CATHETER II is a pragmatic three-arm open multi-centre superiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot, economic analysis, and embedded qualitative study. Eligible participants are adults aged ≥ 18 years, who have had a LTC in use for ≥ 28 days, have no plans to discontinue the use of the catheter, are able to undertake the catheter washouts, and complete trial documentation or have a carer able to help them. Participants are identified from general practitioner practices, secondary/tertiary care, community healthcare, care homes, and via public advertising strategies. Participants are randomised 1:1:1 to receive a weekly saline (0.9%) washout in addition to standard LTC care, a weekly citric acid (3.23%) washout in addition to standard LTC care or standard LTC care only. Participants and/or carers will receive training to administer the washouts. Patient-reported outcomes are collected at baseline and for 24 months post-randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is catheter blockage requiring intervention up to 24 months post-randomisation expressed per 1000 catheter days. Secondary outcomes include symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics, catheter change, adverse events, NHS/ healthcare use, and impact on quality of life.

Discussion: this study will guide treatment decision-making and clinical practice guidelines regarding the effectiveness of various prophylactic catheter washout policies in men and women living with LTC. This research has received ethical approval from Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (19/WA/0015).
1745-6215
Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
5531cad3-00fa-4ec9-9664-d1e64467d5fc
Johnson, Diana
5144874c-5607-4f68-814a-eabe50a75bd4
Constable, Lynda
38cbd21e-2c09-4e66-acfb-be25367b5820
Thomas, Ruth
d7baad80-26d8-4f39-ac08-3ddc0a37fd7e
Cotton, Seonaidh
294f5ff5-98fc-4330-ab75-2d42f323e3f6
Tripathee, Sheela
cf4a52dc-abba-4892-8581-8bde037e40bb
Cooper, David
4c6f39e5-06be-4cf8-b791-3bda929c6684
Boran, Sue
ff1b2e66-41b0-4c16-8dae-f7125a709c15
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos
e0d85b76-c5df-434c-b8e1-cdf247a5daa9
Evans, Suzanne
923fbf15-2f99-464d-ae18-4a36f72a4a91
Granitsiotis, Paraskeve
f0009068-282c-4788-8dbe-508825c1846e
Hashim, Hashim
837f6d30-3735-4fc3-b6ed-0148b7c0ea90
Kilonzo, Mary
91598155-d0a6-47a6-a881-f0743a98967a
Larcombe, James
1d3789d7-71c8-426d-b667-4b0e26a752eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Maclennan, Sara
5fbe738d-a367-4999-8714-231344eaba24
Murchie, Peter
384bebcf-8de7-4136-9946-27bc34fb8c73
Myint, Phyo Kyaw
7c4ec0bf-859f-4c3d-83fa-149ddf5c8283
N’dow, James
fb603b5a-811b-459a-8eb9-2603e4b31ed7
Norrie, John
d648d104-39a0-481f-af0f-9a7209d50fb5
Omar, Muhammad Imran
65c41a36-f828-4917-bbe3-dc2c764bd481
Paterson, Catherine
2685b9d4-3fd5-4570-a865-131b2a119dcd
Scotland, Graham
af689445-91cd-4e94-8aa8-ab47f815dfad
Thiruchelvam, Nikesh
048516f8-98d8-4cf0-854d-b7f90cb4a2c7
Maclennan, Graeme
209593f8-0b7c-44fd-9abc-c1ea575b6c61
Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
5531cad3-00fa-4ec9-9664-d1e64467d5fc
Johnson, Diana
5144874c-5607-4f68-814a-eabe50a75bd4
Constable, Lynda
38cbd21e-2c09-4e66-acfb-be25367b5820
Thomas, Ruth
d7baad80-26d8-4f39-ac08-3ddc0a37fd7e
Cotton, Seonaidh
294f5ff5-98fc-4330-ab75-2d42f323e3f6
Tripathee, Sheela
cf4a52dc-abba-4892-8581-8bde037e40bb
Cooper, David
4c6f39e5-06be-4cf8-b791-3bda929c6684
Boran, Sue
ff1b2e66-41b0-4c16-8dae-f7125a709c15
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos
e0d85b76-c5df-434c-b8e1-cdf247a5daa9
Evans, Suzanne
923fbf15-2f99-464d-ae18-4a36f72a4a91
Granitsiotis, Paraskeve
f0009068-282c-4788-8dbe-508825c1846e
Hashim, Hashim
837f6d30-3735-4fc3-b6ed-0148b7c0ea90
Kilonzo, Mary
91598155-d0a6-47a6-a881-f0743a98967a
Larcombe, James
1d3789d7-71c8-426d-b667-4b0e26a752eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Maclennan, Sara
5fbe738d-a367-4999-8714-231344eaba24
Murchie, Peter
384bebcf-8de7-4136-9946-27bc34fb8c73
Myint, Phyo Kyaw
7c4ec0bf-859f-4c3d-83fa-149ddf5c8283
N’dow, James
fb603b5a-811b-459a-8eb9-2603e4b31ed7
Norrie, John
d648d104-39a0-481f-af0f-9a7209d50fb5
Omar, Muhammad Imran
65c41a36-f828-4917-bbe3-dc2c764bd481
Paterson, Catherine
2685b9d4-3fd5-4570-a865-131b2a119dcd
Scotland, Graham
af689445-91cd-4e94-8aa8-ab47f815dfad
Thiruchelvam, Nikesh
048516f8-98d8-4cf0-854d-b7f90cb4a2c7
Maclennan, Graeme
209593f8-0b7c-44fd-9abc-c1ea575b6c61

Abdel-fattah, Mohamed, Johnson, Diana, Constable, Lynda, Thomas, Ruth, Cotton, Seonaidh, Tripathee, Sheela, Cooper, David, Boran, Sue, Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos, Evans, Suzanne, Granitsiotis, Paraskeve, Hashim, Hashim, Kilonzo, Mary, Larcombe, James, Little, Paul, Maclennan, Sara, Murchie, Peter, Myint, Phyo Kyaw, N’dow, James, Norrie, John, Omar, Muhammad Imran, Paterson, Catherine, Scotland, Graham, Thiruchelvam, Nikesh and Maclennan, Graeme (2022) Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study. Trials, 23 (1). (doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: various washout policies are widely used in adults living with long-term catheters (LTC). There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefits and potential harms of prophylactic LTC washout policies in the prevention of blockages and other LTC-related adverse events, such as urinary tract infections. CATHETER II tests the hypothesis that weekly prophylactic LTC washouts (normal saline or citric acid) in addition to standard LTC care reduce the incidence of catheter blockage requiring intervention compared to standard LTC care only in adults living with LTC.

Methods: CATHETER II is a pragmatic three-arm open multi-centre superiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot, economic analysis, and embedded qualitative study. Eligible participants are adults aged ≥ 18 years, who have had a LTC in use for ≥ 28 days, have no plans to discontinue the use of the catheter, are able to undertake the catheter washouts, and complete trial documentation or have a carer able to help them. Participants are identified from general practitioner practices, secondary/tertiary care, community healthcare, care homes, and via public advertising strategies. Participants are randomised 1:1:1 to receive a weekly saline (0.9%) washout in addition to standard LTC care, a weekly citric acid (3.23%) washout in addition to standard LTC care or standard LTC care only. Participants and/or carers will receive training to administer the washouts. Patient-reported outcomes are collected at baseline and for 24 months post-randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is catheter blockage requiring intervention up to 24 months post-randomisation expressed per 1000 catheter days. Secondary outcomes include symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics, catheter change, adverse events, NHS/ healthcare use, and impact on quality of life.

Discussion: this study will guide treatment decision-making and clinical practice guidelines regarding the effectiveness of various prophylactic catheter washout policies in men and women living with LTC. This research has received ethical approval from Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (19/WA/0015).

Text
s13063-022-06577-2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 July 2022
Published date: 4 August 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476872
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476872
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: c9ab9078-95b3-467b-b22b-9da8efb61db4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2023 16:47
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 01:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mohamed Abdel-fattah
Author: Diana Johnson
Author: Lynda Constable
Author: Ruth Thomas
Author: Seonaidh Cotton
Author: Sheela Tripathee
Author: David Cooper
Author: Sue Boran
Author: Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
Author: Suzanne Evans
Author: Paraskeve Granitsiotis
Author: Hashim Hashim
Author: Mary Kilonzo
Author: James Larcombe
Author: Paul Little
Author: Sara Maclennan
Author: Peter Murchie
Author: Phyo Kyaw Myint
Author: James N’dow
Author: John Norrie
Author: Muhammad Imran Omar
Author: Catherine Paterson
Author: Graham Scotland
Author: Nikesh Thiruchelvam
Author: Graeme Maclennan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×