The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance

Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance
Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance
Summary: systematic reviews that examine effectiveness of interventions to improve medicines optimisation do not explain how or why they work. This realist review identified that interventions which effectively optimise medicines use in osteoporosis include opportunities to address patients’ perceptions of illness and treatment and/or support primary care clinician decision making.Introduction: in people with osteoporosis, adherence to medicines is poorer than other diseases and patients report follow-up is lacking, and multiple unmet information needs. We conducted a rapid realist review to understand what contextual conditions and mechanisms enable interventions to support osteoporosis medication optimisation.Methods: a primary search identified observational or interventional studies which aimed to improve medicines adherence or optimisation; a supplementary second search identified research of any design to gain additional insights on emerging findings. Extracted data was interrogated for patterns of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, further discussed in team meetings, informed by background literature and the Practicalities and Perception Approach as an underpinning conceptual framework.Results: we identified 5 contextual timepoints for the person with osteoporosis (identifying a problem; starting medicine; continuing medicine) and the practitioner and healthcare system (making a diagnosis and giving a treatment recommendation; reviewing medicine). Interventions which support patient-informed decision making appear to influence long-term commitment to treatment. Supporting patients’ practical ability to adhere (e.g. by lowering treatment burden and issuing reminders) only appears to be helpful, when combined with other approaches to address patient beliefs and concerns. However, few studies explicitly addressed patients’ perceptions of illness and treatment. Supporting primary care clinician decision making and integration of primary and secondary care services also appears to be important, in improving rates of treatment initiation and adherence.Conclusions: we identified a need for further research to identify a sustainable, integrated, patient-centred, and cost- and clinically effective model of long-term care for people with osteoporosis.
Humans, Osteoporosis/drug therapy
0937-941X
2245-2257
Paskins, Z.
a11d2204-963b-4def-b36f-3e617caed75a
Babatunde, O.
16470575-cc14-42c1-aeb5-af5d67e79b98
Sturrock, A.
04021e78-02e6-4db0-80e8-5b11e3e11652
Toh, L.S.
fbde4eff-dd23-41c1-ab4b-66626a46a171
Horne, R.
4847dccd-7a84-44b7-9402-341d942c9427
Maidment, I.
391e074b-4ac6-49f6-b032-d32e93119527
Effectiveness Working Group of the Royal Osteoporosis Society Osteoporosis, Bone Research Academy
Paskins, Z.
a11d2204-963b-4def-b36f-3e617caed75a
Babatunde, O.
16470575-cc14-42c1-aeb5-af5d67e79b98
Sturrock, A.
04021e78-02e6-4db0-80e8-5b11e3e11652
Toh, L.S.
fbde4eff-dd23-41c1-ab4b-66626a46a171
Horne, R.
4847dccd-7a84-44b7-9402-341d942c9427
Maidment, I.
391e074b-4ac6-49f6-b032-d32e93119527

Paskins, Z., Babatunde, O., Sturrock, A., Toh, L.S., Horne, R. and Maidment, I. , Effectiveness Working Group of the Royal Osteoporosis Society Osteoporosis, Bone Research Academy (2022) Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance. Osteoporosis International, 33 (11), 2245-2257. (doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06453-4).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Summary: systematic reviews that examine effectiveness of interventions to improve medicines optimisation do not explain how or why they work. This realist review identified that interventions which effectively optimise medicines use in osteoporosis include opportunities to address patients’ perceptions of illness and treatment and/or support primary care clinician decision making.Introduction: in people with osteoporosis, adherence to medicines is poorer than other diseases and patients report follow-up is lacking, and multiple unmet information needs. We conducted a rapid realist review to understand what contextual conditions and mechanisms enable interventions to support osteoporosis medication optimisation.Methods: a primary search identified observational or interventional studies which aimed to improve medicines adherence or optimisation; a supplementary second search identified research of any design to gain additional insights on emerging findings. Extracted data was interrogated for patterns of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, further discussed in team meetings, informed by background literature and the Practicalities and Perception Approach as an underpinning conceptual framework.Results: we identified 5 contextual timepoints for the person with osteoporosis (identifying a problem; starting medicine; continuing medicine) and the practitioner and healthcare system (making a diagnosis and giving a treatment recommendation; reviewing medicine). Interventions which support patient-informed decision making appear to influence long-term commitment to treatment. Supporting patients’ practical ability to adhere (e.g. by lowering treatment burden and issuing reminders) only appears to be helpful, when combined with other approaches to address patient beliefs and concerns. However, few studies explicitly addressed patients’ perceptions of illness and treatment. Supporting primary care clinician decision making and integration of primary and secondary care services also appears to be important, in improving rates of treatment initiation and adherence.Conclusions: we identified a need for further research to identify a sustainable, integrated, patient-centred, and cost- and clinically effective model of long-term care for people with osteoporosis.

Text
s00198-022-06453-4 - Version of Record
Download (851kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 May 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 June 2022
Additional Information: © 2022. The Author(s). Collaborating authors include Elizabeth Curtis & Nicholas Harvey
Keywords: Humans, Osteoporosis/drug therapy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476991
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476991
ISSN: 0937-941X
PURE UUID: 23a2b5c2-b0e1-43de-8762-59de8d563e62

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 May 2023 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 01:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Z. Paskins
Author: O. Babatunde
Author: A. Sturrock
Author: L.S. Toh
Author: R. Horne
Author: I. Maidment
Corporate Author: Effectiveness Working Group of the Royal Osteoporosis Society Osteoporosis, Bone Research Academy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×