Fairness in agreement with European values: an interdisciplinary perspective on AI regulation

Colmenarejo, Alejandra Bringas, Nannini, Luca, Rieger, Alisa, Scott, Kristen M., Zhao, Xuan, Patro, Gourab K., Kasneci, Gjergji and Kinder-Kurlanda, Katharina (2022) Fairness in agreement with European values: an interdisciplinary perspective on AI regulation. In AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. pp. 107-118 . (doi:10.1145/3514094.3534158).

Abstract

With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo

Download statistics