A matter of taste: the adverse effect of pollen compounds on the pre-ingestive gustatory experience of sugar solutions for honeybees
A matter of taste: the adverse effect of pollen compounds on the pre-ingestive gustatory experience of sugar solutions for honeybees
In addition to sugars, nectar contains multiple nutrient compounds in varying concentrations, yet little is known of their effect on the reward properties of nectar and the resulting implications for insect behaviour. We examined the pre-ingestive responses of honeybees to sucrose solutions containing a mix of pollen compounds, the amino acids proline or phenylalanine, or known distasteful substances, quinine and salt. We predicted that in taste and learning assays, bees would respond positively to the presence of nutrient compounds in a sucrose solution. However, bees’ proboscis extension responses decreased when their antennae were stimulated with pollen- or amino acid-supplemented sucrose solutions. Compared to pure sucrose, bees exhibited worse acquisition when conditioned to an odour with pollen-supplemented sucrose as the unconditioned stimulus. Such learning impairment was also observed with quinine-containing sucrose solutions. Our results suggest that bees can use their antennae to detect pollen compounds in floral nectars. Depending on the type and concentrations of compounds present, this may result in nectar being perceived as distasteful by bees, making it less effective in reinforcing the learning of floral cues. Such reward devaluation might be adaptive in cases where plants benefit from regulating the frequency of bee visitation.
Foraging, Honeybee, Insect behaviour, Olfactory learning, PER
333-346
Nicholls, E.
4f11a64f-f14d-41cf-9c42-e668981123a5
Krishna, S.
d049b0ef-747f-46cb-8951-1ba603d98ad0
Wright, O.
3cfb9cfb-81bf-45e3-9de5-c90b460a34e0
Stabler, D.
b275ba93-2cd8-460a-b5dc-b527a268f351
Krefft, A.
e23565a5-a729-4219-b1a9-0ea230adff1d
Somanathan, H.
11781b63-1ff0-4008-a59f-18e4e5ce12f4
Hempel de Ibarra, N.
5abd6390-ac80-49f1-895f-0a4a2d090ea2
1 June 2019
Nicholls, E.
4f11a64f-f14d-41cf-9c42-e668981123a5
Krishna, S.
d049b0ef-747f-46cb-8951-1ba603d98ad0
Wright, O.
3cfb9cfb-81bf-45e3-9de5-c90b460a34e0
Stabler, D.
b275ba93-2cd8-460a-b5dc-b527a268f351
Krefft, A.
e23565a5-a729-4219-b1a9-0ea230adff1d
Somanathan, H.
11781b63-1ff0-4008-a59f-18e4e5ce12f4
Hempel de Ibarra, N.
5abd6390-ac80-49f1-895f-0a4a2d090ea2
Nicholls, E., Krishna, S., Wright, O., Stabler, D., Krefft, A., Somanathan, H. and Hempel de Ibarra, N.
(2019)
A matter of taste: the adverse effect of pollen compounds on the pre-ingestive gustatory experience of sugar solutions for honeybees.
Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 205 (3), .
(doi:10.1007/s00359-019-01347-z).
Abstract
In addition to sugars, nectar contains multiple nutrient compounds in varying concentrations, yet little is known of their effect on the reward properties of nectar and the resulting implications for insect behaviour. We examined the pre-ingestive responses of honeybees to sucrose solutions containing a mix of pollen compounds, the amino acids proline or phenylalanine, or known distasteful substances, quinine and salt. We predicted that in taste and learning assays, bees would respond positively to the presence of nutrient compounds in a sucrose solution. However, bees’ proboscis extension responses decreased when their antennae were stimulated with pollen- or amino acid-supplemented sucrose solutions. Compared to pure sucrose, bees exhibited worse acquisition when conditioned to an odour with pollen-supplemented sucrose as the unconditioned stimulus. Such learning impairment was also observed with quinine-containing sucrose solutions. Our results suggest that bees can use their antennae to detect pollen compounds in floral nectars. Depending on the type and concentrations of compounds present, this may result in nectar being perceived as distasteful by bees, making it less effective in reinforcing the learning of floral cues. Such reward devaluation might be adaptive in cases where plants benefit from regulating the frequency of bee visitation.
Text
s00359-019-01347-z
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2019
Published date: 1 June 2019
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
Funding We acknowledge funding support from UKIERI-DST and BBSRC (SWBiosciences DTP).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
Keywords:
Foraging, Honeybee, Insect behaviour, Olfactory learning, PER
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477087
ISSN: 0340-7594
PURE UUID: c4a392bd-ca73-4361-9a23-e1c03d5c54db
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 May 2023 16:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 13:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
E. Nicholls
Author:
S. Krishna
Author:
O. Wright
Author:
D. Stabler
Author:
A. Krefft
Author:
H. Somanathan
Author:
N. Hempel de Ibarra
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics