Reconceptualising Innovation Failure
Reconceptualising Innovation Failure
This study examines the concept of innovation failure. It is a problematic subject without an accepted definition. For different stakeholders the same innovation can be both a success and a failure at the same time. The academic literature has concentrated on the determinants of innovation success. Yet, there is a notable lack of academic literature that deals with innovation failure as a topic in its own right. As a result, there is limited attention to, and little consensus on, the meaning of innovation failure. Existing definitions imply a highly contingent conceptualisation of innovation failure informed by the different theoretical framings and disciplinary interests of the researchers. We adopt a systematic literature review methodology that examines the concept of innovation failure at the level of the firm and from an innovation management perspective. The findings of this review are based on a total of 69 peer-reviewed articles from 1977-2021. We find the concept is widely used yet poorly defined and frequently lacks any theoretical underpinning. By means of a theory-building inductive synthesis our findings contribute to research by reconceptualising the concept of innovation failure along three processual dimensions: failure-as-experimentation; -judgement and -event.
innovation failure, systematic literature review, Innovation failure, Systematic literature review
Baxter, David
a7d6ba3f-370f-493d-9202-218d5e6dfc54
Trott, Paul
c27a18b4-0115-462d-80a7-d5897760492e
Ellwood, Paul
044c2165-152f-48ea-8a2b-960a18251b56
September 2023
Baxter, David
a7d6ba3f-370f-493d-9202-218d5e6dfc54
Trott, Paul
c27a18b4-0115-462d-80a7-d5897760492e
Ellwood, Paul
044c2165-152f-48ea-8a2b-960a18251b56
Baxter, David, Trott, Paul and Ellwood, Paul
(2023)
Reconceptualising Innovation Failure.
Research Policy, 52 (7), [104811].
(doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104811).
Abstract
This study examines the concept of innovation failure. It is a problematic subject without an accepted definition. For different stakeholders the same innovation can be both a success and a failure at the same time. The academic literature has concentrated on the determinants of innovation success. Yet, there is a notable lack of academic literature that deals with innovation failure as a topic in its own right. As a result, there is limited attention to, and little consensus on, the meaning of innovation failure. Existing definitions imply a highly contingent conceptualisation of innovation failure informed by the different theoretical framings and disciplinary interests of the researchers. We adopt a systematic literature review methodology that examines the concept of innovation failure at the level of the firm and from an innovation management perspective. The findings of this review are based on a total of 69 peer-reviewed articles from 1977-2021. We find the concept is widely used yet poorly defined and frequently lacks any theoretical underpinning. By means of a theory-building inductive synthesis our findings contribute to research by reconceptualising the concept of innovation failure along three processual dimensions: failure-as-experimentation; -judgement and -event.
Text
1-s2.0-S0048733323000951-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2023
Published date: September 2023
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
Keywords:
innovation failure, systematic literature review, Innovation failure, Systematic literature review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477124
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477124
ISSN: 0048-7333
PURE UUID: 8a035811-5619-458c-a3db-cd669e570533
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 May 2023 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paul Trott
Author:
Paul Ellwood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics