Assessing micro- vs macro-costing approaches for treating appendicitis in children with appendicectomy or non-operatively
Assessing micro- vs macro-costing approaches for treating appendicitis in children with appendicectomy or non-operatively
Objectives: we conducted a health economic sub-study within a feasibility RCT comparing a non-operative treatment pathway as an alternative to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. The objectives were to understand and assess data collection tools and methods and to determine indicative costs and benefits assessing the feasibility of conducting a full economic evaluation within the definitive trial.
Methods: we compared different methods of estimating treatment costs including micro-costing, hospital administrative data (PLICS) and health system (NHS) reference costs. We compared two different HRQoL instruments (CHU-9D and EQ-5D-5L) in terms of data completeness and sensitivity to change over time, including potential ceiling effects. We also explored how the timing of data collection and duration of the analysis could affect QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) and the results of the cost-utility analysis (CUA) within the future RCT.
Results: using a micro-costing approach, the total per treatment costs were in alignment with hospital administrative data (PLICS). Average health system reference cost data (macro-costing using NHS costs) could potentially underestimate these treatment costs, particularly for non-operative treatment. Costs incurred following hospital discharge in the primary care setting were minimal, and limited family borne costs were reported by parents/carers. While both HRQoL instruments performed relatively well, our results highlight the problem of ceiling effect and the importance of the timing of data collection and the duration of the analysis in any future assessment using QALYs and CUA.
Conclusions: we highlighted the importance of obtaining accurate individual-patient cost data when conducting economic evaluations. Our results suggest that timing of data collection and duration of the assessment are important considerations when evaluating cost-effectiveness and reporting cost per QALY.
Chorozoglou, Maria
1d8dc56f-914a-402a-8155-4fb1e4380835
Reading, Isabel
6f832276-87b7-4a76-a9ed-b4b3df0a3f66
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Naqvi, Shehryer
eec4ad00-2e37-411b-bb1b-2ddc13749a34
Pardy, Caroline
fba302ea-372e-4357-b6f1-ccbb3fdeb2aa
Sloan, Keren
f010be76-e063-43cf-bedc-7336ecc24a21
Major, Christina
cb49182f-743f-4904-84ad-a4f064c9d150
Demellweek, Natasha
8473bded-bf3c-4bd4-8fe7-59656ac51de4
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Chorozoglou, Maria
1d8dc56f-914a-402a-8155-4fb1e4380835
Reading, Isabel
6f832276-87b7-4a76-a9ed-b4b3df0a3f66
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Naqvi, Shehryer
eec4ad00-2e37-411b-bb1b-2ddc13749a34
Pardy, Caroline
fba302ea-372e-4357-b6f1-ccbb3fdeb2aa
Sloan, Keren
f010be76-e063-43cf-bedc-7336ecc24a21
Major, Christina
cb49182f-743f-4904-84ad-a4f064c9d150
Demellweek, Natasha
8473bded-bf3c-4bd4-8fe7-59656ac51de4
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Chorozoglou, Maria, Reading, Isabel, Eaton, Simon, Naqvi, Shehryer, Pardy, Caroline, Sloan, Keren, Major, Christina, Demellweek, Natasha and Hall, Nigel J.
(2023)
Assessing micro- vs macro-costing approaches for treating appendicitis in children with appendicectomy or non-operatively.
Quality of Life Research.
Abstract
Objectives: we conducted a health economic sub-study within a feasibility RCT comparing a non-operative treatment pathway as an alternative to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. The objectives were to understand and assess data collection tools and methods and to determine indicative costs and benefits assessing the feasibility of conducting a full economic evaluation within the definitive trial.
Methods: we compared different methods of estimating treatment costs including micro-costing, hospital administrative data (PLICS) and health system (NHS) reference costs. We compared two different HRQoL instruments (CHU-9D and EQ-5D-5L) in terms of data completeness and sensitivity to change over time, including potential ceiling effects. We also explored how the timing of data collection and duration of the analysis could affect QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) and the results of the cost-utility analysis (CUA) within the future RCT.
Results: using a micro-costing approach, the total per treatment costs were in alignment with hospital administrative data (PLICS). Average health system reference cost data (macro-costing using NHS costs) could potentially underestimate these treatment costs, particularly for non-operative treatment. Costs incurred following hospital discharge in the primary care setting were minimal, and limited family borne costs were reported by parents/carers. While both HRQoL instruments performed relatively well, our results highlight the problem of ceiling effect and the importance of the timing of data collection and the duration of the analysis in any future assessment using QALYs and CUA.
Conclusions: we highlighted the importance of obtaining accurate individual-patient cost data when conducting economic evaluations. Our results suggest that timing of data collection and duration of the assessment are important considerations when evaluating cost-effectiveness and reporting cost per QALY.
Text
Revised Article (002)
- Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Other.
Text
s11136-023-03442-w
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 June 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477224
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477224
ISSN: 0962-9343
PURE UUID: 3a40e28b-0fd6-45b6-8380-d527c4656e43
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Jun 2023 16:50
Last modified: 16 May 2024 04:01
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Isabel Reading
Author:
Simon Eaton
Author:
Shehryer Naqvi
Author:
Caroline Pardy
Author:
Keren Sloan
Author:
Christina Major
Author:
Natasha Demellweek
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics