The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is auriculotherapy effective and safe for the treatment of anxiety disorders? - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Is auriculotherapy effective and safe for the treatment of anxiety disorders? - A systematic review and meta-analysis
Is auriculotherapy effective and safe for the treatment of anxiety disorders? - A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: Auriculotherapy (AA) could support standard treatment for anxiety disorders (AD), but its effectiveness and safety remain undetermined. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether AA was effective and safe for treating people with AD. Methods: Searches were conducted on eight databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AA compared with placebo, waiting list treatment, routine care, or alternative treatment. Searches were run from inception until the 30th of June 2021. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using statistical software RevMan V5.4. The protocol was published and registered PROSPERO ID: CRD42021254503. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria for quality and of these nine were included in the meta-analysis. AA (n=386) reduced anxiety levels compared with placebo (n=382) standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.44 95% of Confidence Intervals (CI) [-0.60, -0.28], 9 studies, for AA compared with a waiting list (n=360), 8 studies SMD (-0.55; 95% CI [-0.70, -0.41]). Certainty was graded as moderate and with unlikely publication bias. There was moderate certainty of evidence for an AA (n=130) intervention for pre-operatory anxiety levels when compared with placebo (n=129) SMD -1.40 95% CI [-2.54, -0.26], 3 studies and when compared with a waiting list group (n=98) Mean difference (MD) -5.02 95% CI [-8.15, -1.90], 2 studies. Few studies reported adverse events and other important secondary outcomes such as salivary cortisol and vital signs. Conclusion: AA may be effective as a complementary treatment for situational anxiety. There is still an evidence gap regarding its safety and efficacy. The type and frequency of AA used for anxiety treatment requires further exploration.
Acupressure, Anxiety disorders, Auricular acupuncture, Auriculotherapy, Brain stimulation, Systematic review
1876-3820
Vieira, Andreia
3cb2f676-d4b7-4308-b3ef-2266295155c1
Moreira, António
15fcb492-f7ce-4742-983c-9e7a3965cbdd
Machado, Jorge Pereira
d189b43f-5b8f-4e03-af62-66140df5ea50
Robinson, Nicola
8d9e1831-747b-4d1e-aa37-51e0909484c1
Hu, Xiao Yang
65904b24-3775-4b14-9532-eb703a056655
Vieira, Andreia
3cb2f676-d4b7-4308-b3ef-2266295155c1
Moreira, António
15fcb492-f7ce-4742-983c-9e7a3965cbdd
Machado, Jorge Pereira
d189b43f-5b8f-4e03-af62-66140df5ea50
Robinson, Nicola
8d9e1831-747b-4d1e-aa37-51e0909484c1
Hu, Xiao Yang
65904b24-3775-4b14-9532-eb703a056655

Vieira, Andreia, Moreira, António, Machado, Jorge Pereira, Robinson, Nicola and Hu, Xiao Yang (2022) Is auriculotherapy effective and safe for the treatment of anxiety disorders? - A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 54 (9), [102157]. (doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2022.102157).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Auriculotherapy (AA) could support standard treatment for anxiety disorders (AD), but its effectiveness and safety remain undetermined. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether AA was effective and safe for treating people with AD. Methods: Searches were conducted on eight databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of AA compared with placebo, waiting list treatment, routine care, or alternative treatment. Searches were run from inception until the 30th of June 2021. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using statistical software RevMan V5.4. The protocol was published and registered PROSPERO ID: CRD42021254503. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria for quality and of these nine were included in the meta-analysis. AA (n=386) reduced anxiety levels compared with placebo (n=382) standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.44 95% of Confidence Intervals (CI) [-0.60, -0.28], 9 studies, for AA compared with a waiting list (n=360), 8 studies SMD (-0.55; 95% CI [-0.70, -0.41]). Certainty was graded as moderate and with unlikely publication bias. There was moderate certainty of evidence for an AA (n=130) intervention for pre-operatory anxiety levels when compared with placebo (n=129) SMD -1.40 95% CI [-2.54, -0.26], 3 studies and when compared with a waiting list group (n=98) Mean difference (MD) -5.02 95% CI [-8.15, -1.90], 2 studies. Few studies reported adverse events and other important secondary outcomes such as salivary cortisol and vital signs. Conclusion: AA may be effective as a complementary treatment for situational anxiety. There is still an evidence gap regarding its safety and efficacy. The type and frequency of AA used for anxiety treatment requires further exploration.

Text
Is_auriculotherapy _effective_main - Version of Record
Download (10MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 July 2022
Published date: 1 September 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: This article is the result of work supported by Abel Salazar Institute of Biomedical Sciences of the University of Porto resources and facilities. Publisher Copyright:© 2022
Keywords: Acupressure, Anxiety disorders, Auricular acupuncture, Auriculotherapy, Brain stimulation, Systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477239
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477239
ISSN: 1876-3820
PURE UUID: 9a252476-033d-4333-9f93-0c0a7045a5e1
ORCID for Xiao Yang Hu: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-7999

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Jun 2023 16:52
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andreia Vieira
Author: António Moreira
Author: Jorge Pereira Machado
Author: Nicola Robinson
Author: Xiao Yang Hu ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×