The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission

Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission
Introduction: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 and maintain patient flow. Methods: We retrospectively identified all COVID-19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT-PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net-benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT-PCR, composite admission RT-PCR and CXR and repeat RT-PCR with 48 h. Results: RT-PCR single-test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%-94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%-99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT-PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%-97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT-PCR. Net-benefit was 0.83 for single RT-PCR versus 0.89 for RT-PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT-PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. Conclusion: The RT-PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real-world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT-PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow.
Covid-19
1752-6981
618 - 622
Livingstone, Robert
ba504601-a921-4c08-bed9-73f93e9df488
Woodhead, Alexander
faf3d7b0-c9bf-4ecb-a670-1c0f824a142d
Bhandari, Megha
3fa5520b-34ee-4294-8fd7-38082ae86bad
Dias, James
3eff2a0e-91a1-4adc-afe4-4ed4387eae63
Smith, Trevor
53e6838c-2e95-4c8f-9325-53163ab6255d
Havelock, Tom
8f9aa3be-a768-4a7b-bcd4-79656e2b188c
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3
Livingstone, Robert
ba504601-a921-4c08-bed9-73f93e9df488
Woodhead, Alexander
faf3d7b0-c9bf-4ecb-a670-1c0f824a142d
Bhandari, Megha
3fa5520b-34ee-4294-8fd7-38082ae86bad
Dias, James
3eff2a0e-91a1-4adc-afe4-4ed4387eae63
Smith, Trevor
53e6838c-2e95-4c8f-9325-53163ab6255d
Havelock, Tom
8f9aa3be-a768-4a7b-bcd4-79656e2b188c
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3

Livingstone, Robert, Woodhead, Alexander, Bhandari, Megha, Dias, James, Smith, Trevor, Havelock, Tom and Stammers, Matthew (2022) Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial transmission. Clinical Respiratory Journal, 16 (9), 618 - 622. (doi:10.1111/crj.13530).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: In the management of acute hospital admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic, safe patient cohorting depends on robust admission diagnostic strategies. It is essential that screening strategies are sensitive and rapid, to prevent nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 and maintain patient flow. Methods: We retrospectively identified all COVID-19 positive and suspected cases at our institution screened by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between 4 April and 28 June 2020. Using RT-PCR positivity within 7 days as our reference standard, we assessed sensitivity and net-benefit of three admission screening strategies: single admission RT-PCR, composite admission RT-PCR and CXR and repeat RT-PCR with 48 h. Results: RT-PCR single-test sensitivity was 91.5% (87.8%-94.4%) versus 97.7% (95.4%-99.1%) (p = 0.025) for RT-PCR/CXR composite testing and 95.1% (92.1%-97.2%) (p = 0.03) for repeated RT-PCR. Net-benefit was 0.83 for single RT-PCR versus 0.89 for RT-PCR/CXR and 0.87 for repeated RT-PCR at 0.02% threshold probability. Conclusion: The RT-PCR/CXR composite testing strategy was highly sensitive when screening patients at the point of hospital admission. Real-world sensitivity of this approach was comparable to repeat RT-PCR testing within 48 h; however, faster facilitating improved patient flow.

Text
Clinical Respiratory J - 2022 - Livingstone - Optimisation of COVID‐19 diagnostic pathways in acute hospital admissions to - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 August 2022
Published date: September 2022
Keywords: Covid-19

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477296
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477296
ISSN: 1752-6981
PURE UUID: b71e2878-75f0-42de-aa47-dac479613dbc
ORCID for Matthew Stammers: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-3116

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2023 16:37
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert Livingstone
Author: Alexander Woodhead
Author: Megha Bhandari
Author: James Dias
Author: Trevor Smith
Author: Tom Havelock
Author: Matthew Stammers ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×