The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery: analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility

Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery: analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility
Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery: analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility

Purpose: To examine the association between physiotherapy access after hip fracture and discharge home, readmission, survival, and mobility recovery. Methods: A 2017 Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit was linked to hospital records for 5383 patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physiotherapy access in the first postoperative week and discharge home, 30-day readmission post-discharge, 30-day survival and 120-days mobility recovery post-admission adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Hospital Frailty Risk Score and prefracture mobility/residence. Results: Overall, 73% were female and 40% had high frailty risk. Patients who received ≥2 hours of physiotherapy (versus less) had 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 0–6%), 4% (2–6%), and 6% (1–11%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 3% (0–6%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of exercise (versus mobilisation alone) had 6% (1–12%), 3% (0–7%), and 11% (3–18%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 6% (2–10%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of 6–7 days physiotherapy (versus 0–2 days) had 8% (5–11%) higher adjusted probability of survival. For patients with dementia, improved probability of survival, discharge home, readmission and indoor mobility recovery were observed with greater physiotherapy access. Conclusion: Greater access to physiotherapy was associated with a higher probability of positive outcomes. For every 100 patients, greater access could equate to an additional eight patients surviving to 30-days and six avoiding 30-day readmission. The findings suggest a potential benefit in terms of home discharge and outdoor mobility recovery. Contribution of the Paper: • To substantiate a case for additional physiotherapy, evidence for an association with improved outcomes is needed. • Analysis of 5383 patients suggests greater access to physiotherapy was associated with higher probability of positive outcomes. • For every 100 patients, this could equate to six more patients avoiding 30-day readmission and eight more patients surviving to 30-days. • The association between access to physiotherapy and survival persisted irrespective of dementia diagnosis. • For other outcomes, associations varied by the presence/absence of dementia and should be explored by future cohort studies.

Audit, Hip fracture, National Hip Fracture Database, Physiotherapy, Recovery, Rehabilitation
0031-9406
47-59
Almilaji, Orouba
a9fda96c-9e62-4695-93f6-28c828aed496
Ayis, Salma
2bdeb2f7-3cd8-44a2-b635-441aa54ba50d
Goubar, Aicha
b1c35e44-5b47-4a8a-a457-c5150f59a67c
Beaupre, Lauren
fe98ede7-17dc-407e-8d5d-595b6cf304fa
Cameron, Ian D.
13dc7516-bd29-4763-86eb-e4c744ba47a8
Milton-Cole, Rhian
ce881050-5546-417f-b17d-709862559557
Gregson, Celia L.
73bbcc0c-aade-4ad6-b386-b85ecf4a339f
Johansen, Antony
e0a08b28-2168-4a2d-810c-0bf471efef5b
Tange Kristensen, Morten
89d88319-3bad-46ab-aa2c-b18d71a025da
Magaziner, Jay
8ec15403-4724-44e5-a9e7-abb5c15d541f
Martin, Finbarr C.
e8493ba4-cf5c-4e48-aeba-9a8b70fe5b27
Sackley, Catherine
069488ca-e245-4240-85df-2e11bcb2a65f
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Smith, Toby O.
f7ffb9a8-e873-486c-b97f-e56dccb18e32
Sobolev, Boris
de8525f7-fe43-49bd-86d2-5030ac9b27d6
Sheehan, Katie J.
a06a2961-fd4f-43ef-a3e9-fddba0c8bba8
Almilaji, Orouba
a9fda96c-9e62-4695-93f6-28c828aed496
Ayis, Salma
2bdeb2f7-3cd8-44a2-b635-441aa54ba50d
Goubar, Aicha
b1c35e44-5b47-4a8a-a457-c5150f59a67c
Beaupre, Lauren
fe98ede7-17dc-407e-8d5d-595b6cf304fa
Cameron, Ian D.
13dc7516-bd29-4763-86eb-e4c744ba47a8
Milton-Cole, Rhian
ce881050-5546-417f-b17d-709862559557
Gregson, Celia L.
73bbcc0c-aade-4ad6-b386-b85ecf4a339f
Johansen, Antony
e0a08b28-2168-4a2d-810c-0bf471efef5b
Tange Kristensen, Morten
89d88319-3bad-46ab-aa2c-b18d71a025da
Magaziner, Jay
8ec15403-4724-44e5-a9e7-abb5c15d541f
Martin, Finbarr C.
e8493ba4-cf5c-4e48-aeba-9a8b70fe5b27
Sackley, Catherine
069488ca-e245-4240-85df-2e11bcb2a65f
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Smith, Toby O.
f7ffb9a8-e873-486c-b97f-e56dccb18e32
Sobolev, Boris
de8525f7-fe43-49bd-86d2-5030ac9b27d6
Sheehan, Katie J.
a06a2961-fd4f-43ef-a3e9-fddba0c8bba8

Almilaji, Orouba, Ayis, Salma, Goubar, Aicha, Beaupre, Lauren, Cameron, Ian D., Milton-Cole, Rhian, Gregson, Celia L., Johansen, Antony, Tange Kristensen, Morten, Magaziner, Jay, Martin, Finbarr C., Sackley, Catherine, Sadler, Euan, Smith, Toby O., Sobolev, Boris and Sheehan, Katie J. (2023) Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery: analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility. Physiotherapy, 120, 47-59. (doi:10.1016/j.physio.2023.03.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between physiotherapy access after hip fracture and discharge home, readmission, survival, and mobility recovery. Methods: A 2017 Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit was linked to hospital records for 5383 patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physiotherapy access in the first postoperative week and discharge home, 30-day readmission post-discharge, 30-day survival and 120-days mobility recovery post-admission adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Hospital Frailty Risk Score and prefracture mobility/residence. Results: Overall, 73% were female and 40% had high frailty risk. Patients who received ≥2 hours of physiotherapy (versus less) had 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 0–6%), 4% (2–6%), and 6% (1–11%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 3% (0–6%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of exercise (versus mobilisation alone) had 6% (1–12%), 3% (0–7%), and 11% (3–18%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 6% (2–10%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of 6–7 days physiotherapy (versus 0–2 days) had 8% (5–11%) higher adjusted probability of survival. For patients with dementia, improved probability of survival, discharge home, readmission and indoor mobility recovery were observed with greater physiotherapy access. Conclusion: Greater access to physiotherapy was associated with a higher probability of positive outcomes. For every 100 patients, greater access could equate to an additional eight patients surviving to 30-days and six avoiding 30-day readmission. The findings suggest a potential benefit in terms of home discharge and outdoor mobility recovery. Contribution of the Paper: • To substantiate a case for additional physiotherapy, evidence for an association with improved outcomes is needed. • Analysis of 5383 patients suggests greater access to physiotherapy was associated with higher probability of positive outcomes. • For every 100 patients, this could equate to six more patients avoiding 30-day readmission and eight more patients surviving to 30-days. • The association between access to physiotherapy and survival persisted irrespective of dementia diagnosis. • For other outcomes, associations varied by the presence/absence of dementia and should be explored by future cohort studies.

Text
AuthorAcceptedVersion - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)
Text
1-s2.0-S0031940623000172-main - Proof
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (808kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 March 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 March 2023
Published date: September 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: We are grateful to NHS Digital, NHS Wales Informatics Service, and the Royal College of Physician's Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit programme for providing the data used in this study. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS or the Department of Health and Social Care. This publication is based on data collected by or on behalf of Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, who have no responsibility or liability for the accuracy, currency, reliability and/or correctness of this publication. The study did not require NHS Research Ethics Committee approval as it involves secondary analysis of linked pseudo-anonymised data. The authors have received grants from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust related to this work (Grant No: PRF/18/A24). The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust funding provides salary support for AG, and partial salary support for SA. KS also received funding from the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit and UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship for hip fracture health services research. KS is the Chair and AJ and CG are members of the Scientific and Publications Committee of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme which managed the National Hip Fracture Database audit at the Royal College of Physicians. FCM was the funded (2012–2018) board chair and AJ is funded clinical lead of the Falls and Fragility Fracture programme. SA is funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London. CS received funding from the National Institutes of Health Research for research not related to the current study. TS received funding from the National Institutes of Health Research for research not related to the current study. CLG receives funding from Versus Arthritis (ref 22086). ES is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. OA, LB, IDC, BS, RMC, JM and MTK declare no conflicts of interest. Funding Information: The authors have received grants from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust related to this work (Grant No: PRF/18/A24 ). Funding Information: The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust funding provides salary support for AG, and partial salary support for SA. KS also received funding from the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit and UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship for hip fracture health services research. KS is the Chair and AJ and CG are members of the Scientific and Publications Committee of the Falls and Fragility Fracture Audit Programme which managed the National Hip Fracture Database audit at the Royal College of Physicians. FCM was the funded (2012–2018) board chair and AJ is funded clinical lead of the Falls and Fragility Fracture programme. SA is funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London. CS received funding from the National Institutes of Health Research for research not related to the current study. TS received funding from the National Institutes of Health Research for research not related to the current study. CLG receives funding from Versus Arthritis (ref 22086). ES is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Wessex. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. OA, LB, IDC, BS, RMC, JM and MTK declare no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Keywords: Audit, Hip fracture, National Hip Fracture Database, Physiotherapy, Recovery, Rehabilitation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477302
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477302
ISSN: 0031-9406
PURE UUID: f7e488a3-d476-4625-b39b-812395197347
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2023 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Orouba Almilaji
Author: Salma Ayis
Author: Aicha Goubar
Author: Lauren Beaupre
Author: Ian D. Cameron
Author: Rhian Milton-Cole
Author: Celia L. Gregson
Author: Antony Johansen
Author: Morten Tange Kristensen
Author: Jay Magaziner
Author: Finbarr C. Martin
Author: Catherine Sackley
Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Toby O. Smith
Author: Boris Sobolev
Author: Katie J. Sheehan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×