The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Endoscopic management of intentional foreign body ingestion: experience from a UK centre

Endoscopic management of intentional foreign body ingestion: experience from a UK centre
Endoscopic management of intentional foreign body ingestion: experience from a UK centre
Objective: We report on the increasing incidence and outcomes from intentional foreign body ingestion (iFoBI) presenting to our hospital over a 5-year period. The aim was to assess the impact on services and to identify ways to safely mitigate against this clinical challenge.Design/Method: We performed a retrospective observational study of all patients presenting to a university hospital between January 2015 and April 2020 with iFoBI with a focus on objects swallowed, timing of endoscopy and clinical outcomes.
Results: 239 episodes of iFoBI in 51 individuals were recorded with a significant increase in incidence throughout the study period (Welch (5, 17.3)=15.1, p<0.001), imposing a high burden on staff and resources. Items lodged in the oesophagus were more likely to lead to mucosal injury (p=0.009) compared with elsewhere. Ingested item type and timing of endoscopy were not related to complications (p=0.78) or length of stay (p=0.8). In 12% of cases, no objects were seen at endoscopy.
Conclusion: In all except those patients with oesophageal impaction of the object on radiograph, there is no need to perform endoscopic extraction out of hours. A subset of cases can avoid endoscopy with an X-ray immediately prior to the procedure as a significant proportion have passed already. We discuss more holistic approaches to deal with recurrent attendances.
2041-4137
98-103
Yadollahi, Sina
e526d376-f90e-4eba-b1b5-3f362fb3eea4
Buchannan, Ryan
48fbba9b-76ae-4122-9099-88677fc5e24c
Tehami, Nadeem
c3669784-48eb-406d-b62b-8a660e9d15b4
Stacey, Bernard
f5dfe88a-3841-4a8a-a25f-226ca7d04e68
Rahman, Imbadhur
641464ff-3960-48bf-92d8-9907cb12d306
Boger, Philip
45c66f5f-5300-4234-a636-b034ccdfb503
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21
et al.
Yadollahi, Sina
e526d376-f90e-4eba-b1b5-3f362fb3eea4
Buchannan, Ryan
48fbba9b-76ae-4122-9099-88677fc5e24c
Tehami, Nadeem
c3669784-48eb-406d-b62b-8a660e9d15b4
Stacey, Bernard
f5dfe88a-3841-4a8a-a25f-226ca7d04e68
Rahman, Imbadhur
641464ff-3960-48bf-92d8-9907cb12d306
Boger, Philip
45c66f5f-5300-4234-a636-b034ccdfb503
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21

Yadollahi, Sina, Buchannan, Ryan, Tehami, Nadeem and Wright, Mark , et al. (2022) Endoscopic management of intentional foreign body ingestion: experience from a UK centre. Frontline Gastroenterology, 13 (2), 98-103. (doi:10.1136/flgastro-2021-101776).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: We report on the increasing incidence and outcomes from intentional foreign body ingestion (iFoBI) presenting to our hospital over a 5-year period. The aim was to assess the impact on services and to identify ways to safely mitigate against this clinical challenge.Design/Method: We performed a retrospective observational study of all patients presenting to a university hospital between January 2015 and April 2020 with iFoBI with a focus on objects swallowed, timing of endoscopy and clinical outcomes.
Results: 239 episodes of iFoBI in 51 individuals were recorded with a significant increase in incidence throughout the study period (Welch (5, 17.3)=15.1, p<0.001), imposing a high burden on staff and resources. Items lodged in the oesophagus were more likely to lead to mucosal injury (p=0.009) compared with elsewhere. Ingested item type and timing of endoscopy were not related to complications (p=0.78) or length of stay (p=0.8). In 12% of cases, no objects were seen at endoscopy.
Conclusion: In all except those patients with oesophageal impaction of the object on radiograph, there is no need to perform endoscopic extraction out of hours. A subset of cases can avoid endoscopy with an X-ray immediately prior to the procedure as a significant proportion have passed already. We discuss more holistic approaches to deal with recurrent attendances.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 March 2021
Published date: 7 February 2022
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477393
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477393
ISSN: 2041-4137
PURE UUID: 87995cc0-34cd-4ff4-b2dd-e1958afa82ce

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2023 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sina Yadollahi
Author: Ryan Buchannan
Author: Nadeem Tehami
Author: Bernard Stacey
Author: Imbadhur Rahman
Author: Philip Boger
Author: Mark Wright
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×