The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory

RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
Objectives: This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation.
Setting: RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation.
Participants and Outcome Measures: Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists' attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings.
Ethics and Dissemination: Approval obtained through the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12464275.
Caregivers, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Return to Work, Stroke/therapy, Stroke Rehabilitation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors
2044-6055
e053111
Radford, Kathryn A
df2aa34f-45ad-426c-801a-ef242dd15b25
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Clarke, Sara
4afebbad-d524-4a3a-9298-b4dea345dd07
Powers, Katie
4d1b0dce-f773-405f-91b8-cd3b4ec92806
Phillips, Julie
c4f9a44d-7e83-4fb3-a8a8-8db20dede7c1
Craven, Kristelle
150f1cc9-2ed5-4347-ae86-19a4c04869a6
Watkins, Caroline
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Farrin, Amanda
9e87b2c8-00bb-4f5f-ab96-862620877c5e
Holmes, Jain
e4d14097-c72a-4a25-ae03-bdefecec9874
Cripps, Rachel
d6b21617-b4e7-45de-a21b-88e54526155f
McLellan, Vicki
f63a0a99-f24d-4d30-9119-e9994e63b043
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Brindle, Richard
99d25c25-ff8f-4916-ab54-fc82237f4374
Holloway, Ivana
7e2ab643-b205-4960-a6f1-8ccb0e324c76
Hartley, Suzanne
3773e30f-8799-41fd-8608-a28750aff0bf
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
O'Connor, Rory J
261cec3b-f52d-4d53-9e05-4f7c2d54d0f8
Stevens, Judith
8088dede-6065-400a-b981-10c7a93c08c3
Walker, Marion
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Murray, John
cae4dddc-7d1f-4de6-a664-bb337146d139
Shone, Angela
16e777b8-6399-4a97-9204-3ae6cdbc2fbd
Clarke, David
0e235b50-5977-4f68-9561-2038586380e5
et al.
Radford, Kathryn A
df2aa34f-45ad-426c-801a-ef242dd15b25
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Clarke, Sara
4afebbad-d524-4a3a-9298-b4dea345dd07
Powers, Katie
4d1b0dce-f773-405f-91b8-cd3b4ec92806
Phillips, Julie
c4f9a44d-7e83-4fb3-a8a8-8db20dede7c1
Craven, Kristelle
150f1cc9-2ed5-4347-ae86-19a4c04869a6
Watkins, Caroline
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Farrin, Amanda
9e87b2c8-00bb-4f5f-ab96-862620877c5e
Holmes, Jain
e4d14097-c72a-4a25-ae03-bdefecec9874
Cripps, Rachel
d6b21617-b4e7-45de-a21b-88e54526155f
McLellan, Vicki
f63a0a99-f24d-4d30-9119-e9994e63b043
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Brindle, Richard
99d25c25-ff8f-4916-ab54-fc82237f4374
Holloway, Ivana
7e2ab643-b205-4960-a6f1-8ccb0e324c76
Hartley, Suzanne
3773e30f-8799-41fd-8608-a28750aff0bf
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
O'Connor, Rory J
261cec3b-f52d-4d53-9e05-4f7c2d54d0f8
Stevens, Judith
8088dede-6065-400a-b981-10c7a93c08c3
Walker, Marion
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Murray, John
cae4dddc-7d1f-4de6-a664-bb337146d139
Shone, Angela
16e777b8-6399-4a97-9204-3ae6cdbc2fbd
Clarke, David
0e235b50-5977-4f68-9561-2038586380e5

Radford, Kathryn A, McKevitt, Christopher, Clarke, Sara and Sach, Tracey , et al. (2022) RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory. BMJ Open, 12 (3), e053111. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053111).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: This mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation.
Setting: RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation.
Participants and Outcome Measures: Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists' attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings.
Ethics and Dissemination: Approval obtained through the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12464275.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 January 2022
Published date: 15 March 2022
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. Funded: NIHR (15/130/11)
Keywords: Caregivers, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Return to Work, Stroke/therapy, Stroke Rehabilitation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477407
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477407
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 4688ad74-5d2a-465c-9b9d-0824a56cd71a
ORCID for Tracey Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2023 16:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kathryn A Radford
Author: Christopher McKevitt
Author: Sara Clarke
Author: Katie Powers
Author: Julie Phillips
Author: Kristelle Craven
Author: Caroline Watkins
Author: Amanda Farrin
Author: Jain Holmes
Author: Rachel Cripps
Author: Vicki McLellan
Author: Tracey Sach ORCID iD
Author: Richard Brindle
Author: Ivana Holloway
Author: Suzanne Hartley
Author: Audrey Bowen
Author: Rory J O'Connor
Author: Judith Stevens
Author: Marion Walker
Author: John Murray
Author: Angela Shone
Author: David Clarke
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×