The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pipe clamping mattresses to mitigate flowline walking; Physical modelling trials on three offshore soils

Pipe clamping mattresses to mitigate flowline walking; Physical modelling trials on three offshore soils
Pipe clamping mattresses to mitigate flowline walking; Physical modelling trials on three offshore soils

Pipe clamping mattresses (PCMs) are a relatively new system for providing anchoring force to pipelines, to mitigate offshore flowline ‘walking’. They represent a cost-effective and highly efficient alternative to anchor piles, rock dump and conventional concrete mattresses. The system comprises a hinged concrete structure that clamps onto a section of laid pipeline, with concrete ballast logs securing the clamping action – with the benefit that 100% of the submerged weight of the PCM contributes to axial friction. PCMs have been applied successfully to one deepwater project, but performance data showing the influence of soil type, and allowing a general design framework to be established, has not yet been available. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the performance of PCMs through three series of centrifuge tests, supported by three Operators. Each series comprises tests on a different reconstituted deepwater soil as follows: (a) West African clay; (b) Gulf of Mexico clay; and (c) carbonate silty sand. In each test, a scaled pipeline is installed in-flight and cycled axially to represent its prior operating life. Scaled PCM models and ballast units are then installed onto the pipe in-flight, mimicking the use of PCMs to mitigate pipeline walking during operation. After installation of the PCMs, further axial cycles are applied, with the system settlement and changes in axial resistance and excess pore pressure measured. The paper shows the performance and applicability of PCMs for a range of soil types, highlighting variations in axial resistance and settlement. The suite of results will help to calibrate design tools for industry, removing unnecessary conservatism and enabling an optimised pipeline anchoring solution to be designed. Key results are equivalent friction factors for the combined pipe-PCM system and PCM settlement, which both show behaviour dependent on soil type. In the clay soils, friction increases significantly over time due to ‘consolidation hardening’. This provides validation of an important effect that has only recently been recognised in pipeline design. In contrast, hardening behavior is not evident in silty sand – although the study suggests there is potential for increasing resistance associated with settlement, which appears to mobilize additional (wedging) stress around the pipeline. Upon PCM installation, the pipelines embed further due to the added weight. Additional settlement occurs during cycling of the system, due to immediate soil deformation and consolidation-related compression. The magnitude of embedment is greater for the clay soils, but in all cases does not cause the clamping action to release. Overall, the efficiency of the PCM system in providing a high level of anchoring force per unit weight placed on the seabed is confirmed. Long term anchoring forces in the range 50-100% of the submerged weight of the PCM are demonstrated. This is several times more efficient than the commonly used alternative of a rock berm.

0160-3663
Offshore Technology Conference
O’beirne, Colm
4730a8bb-2796-4020-b349-2fcdc8962da4
Watson, Phil
236d28ae-367b-41cd-8327-fcc488e931ef
O’loughlin, Conleth
d2821636-d20b-4fea-82fb-c1c64b53433c
White, David
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Hodson, Alexander
062b4fb5-c364-412f-9998-f7f5b39e74be
Ang, Sze Yu
e9c67a13-cd74-4744-9712-8e386b14e8d8
Frankenmolen, Sebastiaan
d2965f2a-0ff2-4af2-9b44-01780d3ef3ff
Hoj-Hansen, Jesper
54f89d85-2f8b-467f-a747-f8c761d099b2
Kuo, Matthew
200cb9a8-fa75-4647-a3ed-81441e68c449
Roe, Toby
55fbcb7d-a6ac-4c8f-907d-d2d513f4d976
O’beirne, Colm
4730a8bb-2796-4020-b349-2fcdc8962da4
Watson, Phil
236d28ae-367b-41cd-8327-fcc488e931ef
O’loughlin, Conleth
d2821636-d20b-4fea-82fb-c1c64b53433c
White, David
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Hodson, Alexander
062b4fb5-c364-412f-9998-f7f5b39e74be
Ang, Sze Yu
e9c67a13-cd74-4744-9712-8e386b14e8d8
Frankenmolen, Sebastiaan
d2965f2a-0ff2-4af2-9b44-01780d3ef3ff
Hoj-Hansen, Jesper
54f89d85-2f8b-467f-a747-f8c761d099b2
Kuo, Matthew
200cb9a8-fa75-4647-a3ed-81441e68c449
Roe, Toby
55fbcb7d-a6ac-4c8f-907d-d2d513f4d976

O’beirne, Colm, Watson, Phil, O’loughlin, Conleth, White, David, Hodson, Alexander, Ang, Sze Yu, Frankenmolen, Sebastiaan, Hoj-Hansen, Jesper, Kuo, Matthew and Roe, Toby (2021) Pipe clamping mattresses to mitigate flowline walking; Physical modelling trials on three offshore soils. In New Technologies to Advance Offshore EOR: From the Lab to the Field. Offshore Technology Conference.. (doi:10.4043/31064-MS).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Pipe clamping mattresses (PCMs) are a relatively new system for providing anchoring force to pipelines, to mitigate offshore flowline ‘walking’. They represent a cost-effective and highly efficient alternative to anchor piles, rock dump and conventional concrete mattresses. The system comprises a hinged concrete structure that clamps onto a section of laid pipeline, with concrete ballast logs securing the clamping action – with the benefit that 100% of the submerged weight of the PCM contributes to axial friction. PCMs have been applied successfully to one deepwater project, but performance data showing the influence of soil type, and allowing a general design framework to be established, has not yet been available. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the performance of PCMs through three series of centrifuge tests, supported by three Operators. Each series comprises tests on a different reconstituted deepwater soil as follows: (a) West African clay; (b) Gulf of Mexico clay; and (c) carbonate silty sand. In each test, a scaled pipeline is installed in-flight and cycled axially to represent its prior operating life. Scaled PCM models and ballast units are then installed onto the pipe in-flight, mimicking the use of PCMs to mitigate pipeline walking during operation. After installation of the PCMs, further axial cycles are applied, with the system settlement and changes in axial resistance and excess pore pressure measured. The paper shows the performance and applicability of PCMs for a range of soil types, highlighting variations in axial resistance and settlement. The suite of results will help to calibrate design tools for industry, removing unnecessary conservatism and enabling an optimised pipeline anchoring solution to be designed. Key results are equivalent friction factors for the combined pipe-PCM system and PCM settlement, which both show behaviour dependent on soil type. In the clay soils, friction increases significantly over time due to ‘consolidation hardening’. This provides validation of an important effect that has only recently been recognised in pipeline design. In contrast, hardening behavior is not evident in silty sand – although the study suggests there is potential for increasing resistance associated with settlement, which appears to mobilize additional (wedging) stress around the pipeline. Upon PCM installation, the pipelines embed further due to the added weight. Additional settlement occurs during cycling of the system, due to immediate soil deformation and consolidation-related compression. The magnitude of embedment is greater for the clay soils, but in all cases does not cause the clamping action to release. Overall, the efficiency of the PCM system in providing a high level of anchoring force per unit weight placed on the seabed is confirmed. Long term anchoring forces in the range 50-100% of the submerged weight of the PCM are demonstrated. This is several times more efficient than the commonly used alternative of a rock berm.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: The centrifuge testing described in this paper was (independently) funded by three Operators. Shell funding was provided via the Shell Chair in Offshore Engineering at The University of Western Australia, and it is further acknowledged that the PCM concept is subject to a patent application held by Shell. Woodside funding was provided by Woodside Energy Ltd, as operator of the North West Shelf Project Joint Venture, involving BHP Billiton Petroleum (North West Shelf) Pty Ltd, bp Developments Australia Pty Ltd, Chevron Australia Pty Ltd, Japan Australia LNG (MIMI) Pty Ltd, Woodside Energy Ltd and Shell Australia Pty Ltd. Funding from bp was provided under subcontract to Subcon. The authors also gratefully acknowledge technical support during from Andy Hill (bp) and Crondall Energy during planning, execution and review of relevant test campaigns. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, Offshore Technology Conference. All rights reserved.
Venue - Dates: Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 2021, , Virtual, Online, 2021-08-16 - 2021-08-19

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477478
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477478
ISSN: 0160-3663
PURE UUID: 078b8c1e-2805-4a75-abd6-8fab677585a6
ORCID for David White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2023 17:18
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Colm O’beirne
Author: Phil Watson
Author: Conleth O’loughlin
Author: David White ORCID iD
Author: Alexander Hodson
Author: Sze Yu Ang
Author: Sebastiaan Frankenmolen
Author: Jesper Hoj-Hansen
Author: Matthew Kuo
Author: Toby Roe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×