The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The hazard components of representative key risks: the physical climate perspective

The hazard components of representative key risks: the physical climate perspective
The hazard components of representative key risks: the physical climate perspective

The framework of Representative Key Risks (RKRs) has been adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II (WGII) to categorize, assess and communicate a wide range of regional and sectoral key risks from climate change. These are risks expected to become severe due to the potentially detrimental convergence of changing climate conditions with the exposure and vulnerability of human and natural systems. Other papers in this special issue treat each of eight RKRs holistically by assessing their current status and future evolution as a result of this convergence. However, in these papers, such assessment cannot always be organized according to a systematic gradation of climatic changes. Often the big-picture evolution of risk has to be extrapolated from either qualitative effects of “low”, “medium” and “high” warming, or limited/focused analysis of the consequences of particular mitigation choices (e.g., benefits of limiting warming to 1.5 or 2C), together with consideration of the socio-economic context and possible adaptation choices. In this study we offer a representation – as systematic as possible given current literature and assessments – of the future evolution of the hazard components of RKRs. We identify the relevant hazards for each RKR, based upon the WGII authors’ assessment, and we report on their current state and expected future changes in magnitude, intensity and/or frequency, linking these changes to Global Warming Levels (GWLs) to the extent possible. We draw on the assessment of changes in climatic impact-drivers relevant to RKRs described in the 6th Assessment Report by Working Group I supplemented when needed by more recent literature. For some of these quantities - like regional trends in oceanic and atmospheric temperature and precipitation, some heat and precipitation extremes, permafrost thaw and Northern Hemisphere snow cover - a strong and quantitative relationship with increasing GWLs has been identified. For others - like frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones and extra-tropical storms, and fire weather - that link can only be described qualitatively. For some processes - like the behavior of ice sheets, or changes in circulation dynamics - large uncertainties about the effects of different GWLs remain, and for a few others - like ocean pH and air pollution - the composition of the scenario of anthropogenic emissions is most relevant, rather than the warming reached. In almost all cases, however, the basic message remains that every small increment in CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere and associated warming will bring changes in climate phenomena that will contribute to increasing risk of impacts on human and natural systems, in the absence of compensating changes in these systems’ exposure and vulnerability, and in the absence of effective adaptation. Our picture of the evolution of RKR-relevant climatic impact-drivers complements and enriches the treatment of RKRs in the other papers in at least two ways: by filling in their often only cursory or limited representation of the physical climate aspects driving impacts, and by providing a fuller representation of their future potential evolution, an important component – if never the only one – of the future evolution of risk severity.

2212-0963
Tebaldi, Claudia
785f8ed4-6f8f-444e-ae98-1edd0d421cd0
Aðalgeirsdóttir, Guðfinna
d7536dbf-aeea-4fff-b6bf-d37bfc630af3
Drijfhout, Sybren
a5c76079-179b-490c-93fe-fc0391aacf13
Dunne, John
08405dbe-3966-4b0c-853e-258f755bb9de
Edwards, Tamsin L.
bf7819c5-0013-44e7-b213-32f871bf54a1
Fischer, Erich
bb489fe2-4651-4847-ac57-5f4c56e000f7
Fyfe, John C.
6ae5621c-5234-43b9-8b4c-303db24796a8
Jones, Richard G.
3dc503e0-8a70-4b9b-b068-632963f9742f
Kopp, Robert E.
de191992-6b45-4661-be96-d1a0b14becef
Koven, Charles
e91fbe55-4bc7-4fdc-9ad7-4f0e13ab67c5
Krinner, Gerhard
ad35a16b-71ce-43f4-b158-46f0f9d4e195
Otto, Friederike
16745a47-22ca-4826-84b6-5550e2a2ebb7
Ruane, Alex C.
997c06ef-4da3-422a-94e0-fa4dda02d57a
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
1478d543-9dd8-4247-a416-cf51c2114b20
Sillmann, Jana
34ea9384-100b-4161-99c4-ecb5558f19b9
Szopa, Sophie
c6ef4672-0874-4e12-9fdd-450e9020fc4b
Zanis, Prodromos
5ec07da3-f836-469a-a34c-92c51a2bae92
Tebaldi, Claudia
785f8ed4-6f8f-444e-ae98-1edd0d421cd0
Aðalgeirsdóttir, Guðfinna
d7536dbf-aeea-4fff-b6bf-d37bfc630af3
Drijfhout, Sybren
a5c76079-179b-490c-93fe-fc0391aacf13
Dunne, John
08405dbe-3966-4b0c-853e-258f755bb9de
Edwards, Tamsin L.
bf7819c5-0013-44e7-b213-32f871bf54a1
Fischer, Erich
bb489fe2-4651-4847-ac57-5f4c56e000f7
Fyfe, John C.
6ae5621c-5234-43b9-8b4c-303db24796a8
Jones, Richard G.
3dc503e0-8a70-4b9b-b068-632963f9742f
Kopp, Robert E.
de191992-6b45-4661-be96-d1a0b14becef
Koven, Charles
e91fbe55-4bc7-4fdc-9ad7-4f0e13ab67c5
Krinner, Gerhard
ad35a16b-71ce-43f4-b158-46f0f9d4e195
Otto, Friederike
16745a47-22ca-4826-84b6-5550e2a2ebb7
Ruane, Alex C.
997c06ef-4da3-422a-94e0-fa4dda02d57a
Seneviratne, Sonia I.
1478d543-9dd8-4247-a416-cf51c2114b20
Sillmann, Jana
34ea9384-100b-4161-99c4-ecb5558f19b9
Szopa, Sophie
c6ef4672-0874-4e12-9fdd-450e9020fc4b
Zanis, Prodromos
5ec07da3-f836-469a-a34c-92c51a2bae92

Tebaldi, Claudia, Aðalgeirsdóttir, Guðfinna, Drijfhout, Sybren, Dunne, John, Edwards, Tamsin L., Fischer, Erich, Fyfe, John C., Jones, Richard G., Kopp, Robert E., Koven, Charles, Krinner, Gerhard, Otto, Friederike, Ruane, Alex C., Seneviratne, Sonia I., Sillmann, Jana, Szopa, Sophie and Zanis, Prodromos (2023) The hazard components of representative key risks: the physical climate perspective. Climate Risk Management, 40, [100516]. (doi:10.1016/j.crm.2023.100516).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The framework of Representative Key Risks (RKRs) has been adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II (WGII) to categorize, assess and communicate a wide range of regional and sectoral key risks from climate change. These are risks expected to become severe due to the potentially detrimental convergence of changing climate conditions with the exposure and vulnerability of human and natural systems. Other papers in this special issue treat each of eight RKRs holistically by assessing their current status and future evolution as a result of this convergence. However, in these papers, such assessment cannot always be organized according to a systematic gradation of climatic changes. Often the big-picture evolution of risk has to be extrapolated from either qualitative effects of “low”, “medium” and “high” warming, or limited/focused analysis of the consequences of particular mitigation choices (e.g., benefits of limiting warming to 1.5 or 2C), together with consideration of the socio-economic context and possible adaptation choices. In this study we offer a representation – as systematic as possible given current literature and assessments – of the future evolution of the hazard components of RKRs. We identify the relevant hazards for each RKR, based upon the WGII authors’ assessment, and we report on their current state and expected future changes in magnitude, intensity and/or frequency, linking these changes to Global Warming Levels (GWLs) to the extent possible. We draw on the assessment of changes in climatic impact-drivers relevant to RKRs described in the 6th Assessment Report by Working Group I supplemented when needed by more recent literature. For some of these quantities - like regional trends in oceanic and atmospheric temperature and precipitation, some heat and precipitation extremes, permafrost thaw and Northern Hemisphere snow cover - a strong and quantitative relationship with increasing GWLs has been identified. For others - like frequency and intensity of tropical cyclones and extra-tropical storms, and fire weather - that link can only be described qualitatively. For some processes - like the behavior of ice sheets, or changes in circulation dynamics - large uncertainties about the effects of different GWLs remain, and for a few others - like ocean pH and air pollution - the composition of the scenario of anthropogenic emissions is most relevant, rather than the warming reached. In almost all cases, however, the basic message remains that every small increment in CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere and associated warming will bring changes in climate phenomena that will contribute to increasing risk of impacts on human and natural systems, in the absence of compensating changes in these systems’ exposure and vulnerability, and in the absence of effective adaptation. Our picture of the evolution of RKR-relevant climatic impact-drivers complements and enriches the treatment of RKRs in the other papers in at least two ways: by filling in their often only cursory or limited representation of the physical climate aspects driving impacts, and by providing a fuller representation of their future potential evolution, an important component – if never the only one – of the future evolution of risk severity.

Text
1-s2.0-S2212096323000426-main - Version of Record
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 April 2023
Published date: 17 May 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: C. Tebaldi was supported by the Calibrated and Systematic Characterization, Attribution and Detection of Extremes (CASCADE) project, funded by US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and by the Integrated Coastal Modeling (IcoM) project, also funded by US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research . A.C. Ruane received support from US NASA Earth Sciences Division Climate Impacts Group funding and Community Service grants. REK was supported by NASA (award 80NSSC20K1724 and JPL task 105393.509496.02.08.13.31 ) and by US National Science Foundation award ICER-2103754 , as part of the Megalopolitan Coastal Transformation Hub. T. L. Edwards was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council ( NE/T007443/1 ) and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 869304 , PROTECT contribution number TBD. JS is supported by the Cluster of Excellence Climate, Climatic Change and Society (CLICCS) funded by DFG and the CICERO Strategic Project on Climate Change Risk (no. 160015/F40 ), funded by the Research Council of Norway, Norway . PZ was supported by the “National Network on Climate Change and its Impacts—CLIMPACT” funded by the Public Investment Program of Greece (grant no. 2018SE01300001 ). The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback, which substantially improved this article. Funding Information: C. Tebaldi was supported by the Calibrated and Systematic Characterization, Attribution and Detection of Extremes (CASCADE) project, funded by US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and by the Integrated Coastal Modeling (IcoM) project, also funded by US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. A.C. Ruane received support from US NASA Earth Sciences Division Climate Impacts Group funding and Community Service grants. REK was supported by NASA (award 80NSSC20K1724 and JPL task 105393.509496.02.08.13.31) and by US National Science Foundation award ICER-2103754, as part of the Megalopolitan Coastal Transformation Hub. T. L. Edwards was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/T007443/1) and by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 869304, PROTECT contribution number TBD. JS is supported by the Cluster of Excellence Climate, Climatic Change and Society (CLICCS) funded by DFG and the CICERO Strategic Project on Climate Change Risk (no. 160015/F40), funded by the Research Council of Norway, Norway. PZ was supported by the “National Network on Climate Change and its Impacts—CLIMPACT” funded by the Public Investment Program of Greece (grant no. 2018SE01300001). The authors would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback, which substantially improved this article.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477500
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477500
ISSN: 2212-0963
PURE UUID: 7673d979-e57d-46cb-91bf-71237e3b1b44
ORCID for Sybren Drijfhout: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-7350

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2023 16:54
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Claudia Tebaldi
Author: Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir
Author: John Dunne
Author: Tamsin L. Edwards
Author: Erich Fischer
Author: John C. Fyfe
Author: Richard G. Jones
Author: Robert E. Kopp
Author: Charles Koven
Author: Gerhard Krinner
Author: Friederike Otto
Author: Alex C. Ruane
Author: Sonia I. Seneviratne
Author: Jana Sillmann
Author: Sophie Szopa
Author: Prodromos Zanis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×