The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Background: azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatory actions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.

Methods: in this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once per day by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatment groups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment and were twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to the outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.

Findings: between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) were eligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was 65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomly allocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall, 561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median 10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, no significant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24).

Interpretation: in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or other prespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restricted to patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication.

Funding: UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research.
0140-6736
605-612
Ahmed, Muhammad S.
f469ead7-dc73-4da2-a368-8292bb49567d
Bagmane, Dinesh
9cfd53e9-bddc-451d-a3ae-d8a84481c09a
Cathie, Katrina
4b772af2-4b34-45d4-866a-fb934376e1cd
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Felongco, Mae
adab824f-492d-4e55-ac7c-c26d8c552b99
Fletcher, Sophie
71599088-9df7-4d4a-8570-aef773ead0fe
Griffiths, Daniel
4a07509e-1f42-4117-9024-fcc86f6682d5
Johnson, Mark
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Jones, Chrissie E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Martin, Karen
0de5a0ff-bb29-4cbd-890d-169cc0d7c032
Miller, David
528f92f1-9ec9-45f3-968f-b7a1f2714d08
Mistry, Heena
216f0018-b071-406c-9b66-0e025ca959a7
Robinson, Matthew
ed6daec9-f2ec-4f4e-a7de-52ec6b5023da
Rupani, Hitasha
cbc7068a-4279-4c8e-b83f-353210711062
Sterrenburg, Monique
d1e562b5-e675-4ca2-926d-8848ed17b21d
Sunni, Nadia
26a6bf27-03e1-4748-b418-34ca953356fe
Wignall, Christopher
0fd9e11b-8f96-467f-810c-041bbfca40bc
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group
Ahmed, Muhammad S.
f469ead7-dc73-4da2-a368-8292bb49567d
Bagmane, Dinesh
9cfd53e9-bddc-451d-a3ae-d8a84481c09a
Cathie, Katrina
4b772af2-4b34-45d4-866a-fb934376e1cd
Faust, Saul N.
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Felongco, Mae
adab824f-492d-4e55-ac7c-c26d8c552b99
Fletcher, Sophie
71599088-9df7-4d4a-8570-aef773ead0fe
Griffiths, Daniel
4a07509e-1f42-4117-9024-fcc86f6682d5
Johnson, Mark
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Jones, Chrissie E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
Martin, Karen
0de5a0ff-bb29-4cbd-890d-169cc0d7c032
Miller, David
528f92f1-9ec9-45f3-968f-b7a1f2714d08
Mistry, Heena
216f0018-b071-406c-9b66-0e025ca959a7
Robinson, Matthew
ed6daec9-f2ec-4f4e-a7de-52ec6b5023da
Rupani, Hitasha
cbc7068a-4279-4c8e-b83f-353210711062
Sterrenburg, Monique
d1e562b5-e675-4ca2-926d-8848ed17b21d
Sunni, Nadia
26a6bf27-03e1-4748-b418-34ca953356fe
Wignall, Christopher
0fd9e11b-8f96-467f-810c-041bbfca40bc

The RECOVERY Collaborative Group (2021) Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. The Lancet, 397 (10274), 605-612. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00149-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatory actions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.

Methods: in this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once per day by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatment groups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment and were twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to the outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.

Findings: between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) were eligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was 65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomly allocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall, 561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median 10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, no significant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24).

Interpretation: in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or other prespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restricted to patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication.

Funding: UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research.

Text
PIIS0140673621001495 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (847kB)

More information

Published date: 2 February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477505
ISSN: 0140-6736
PURE UUID: c634c77d-8824-4f29-81c2-f406ebf17db3
ORCID for Muhammad S. Ahmed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3234-2788
ORCID for Saul N. Faust: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-7642
ORCID for Sophie Fletcher: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-905X
ORCID for Mark Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-9912
ORCID for Chrissie E. Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-2368
ORCID for Karen Martin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-0501
ORCID for Monique Sterrenburg: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-7764

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2023 16:56
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Muhammad S. Ahmed ORCID iD
Author: Dinesh Bagmane
Author: Katrina Cathie
Author: Saul N. Faust ORCID iD
Author: Mae Felongco
Author: Sophie Fletcher ORCID iD
Author: Daniel Griffiths
Author: Mark Johnson ORCID iD
Author: Karen Martin ORCID iD
Author: David Miller
Author: Heena Mistry
Author: Matthew Robinson
Author: Hitasha Rupani
Author: Monique Sterrenburg ORCID iD
Author: Nadia Sunni
Author: Christopher Wignall
Corporate Author: The RECOVERY Collaborative Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×