The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey

Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey
Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey
Background: Fluoroscopy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) exposes staff and patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation. We performed a UK survey to explore trainee and trainer attitudes to radiation protection and cholangiogram interpretation in ERCP.
Methods: An electronic 10-point survey was prospectively distributed to endoscopy unit leads, training programme directors between October and November 2019. Only UK-based ERCP trainees and trainers with hands-on procedural exposure were eligible for the survey.
Results: The survey was completed by 107 respondents (58 trainees and 49 trainers), with an estimated overall response rate of 46%. Overall, 49% of respondents were up to date with their radiation protection course, 38% were aware of European Basic safety standards directive (BSSD), 38% wore radiation protection goggles, and 40% were aware of the average radiation screening dose per ERCP procedure. Compared with trainers, trainees were less likely to routinely wear thyroid protection shields (76% vs 92%; p=0.028), have awareness of the BSSD (20% vs 49%; p=0.037) or know their average procedural radiation dosages (21% vs 63%; p<0.001). With regard to cholangiogram interpretation, only 26% had received formal training, with 97% of trainees expressing a desire for further training.
Conclusion: This survey highlights a relative complacency in safety attitudes to radiation protection during ERCP. These data provide impetus to improve training and quality assurance in radiation protection, which should be regarded as a mandatory safety aspect prior to commencing hands-on ERCP training.
2041-4137
550-556
Siau, Keith
ed8f2716-22f7-47cd-ad3b-e035b12a9842
Webster, George
0d54caff-75d5-4a5f-b2cc-b9de1c4e0344
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21
Maher, Ben
d2b726ca-deab-4ccb-b942-cab2134c669e
Stedman, Brian
180a4644-f670-4da1-84db-9d5640e4ec1d
Johnson, Gavin
1cd7b817-0168-48a0-a392-71944cbfa3d7
Ahmad, Saqib
42b1b1f9-1537-46fa-9cb2-fa570f7c081a
Tehami, Nadeem
c3669784-48eb-406d-b62b-8a660e9d15b4
et al.
Siau, Keith
ed8f2716-22f7-47cd-ad3b-e035b12a9842
Webster, George
0d54caff-75d5-4a5f-b2cc-b9de1c4e0344
Wright, Mark
43325ef9-3459-4c75-b3bf-cf8d8dac2a21
Maher, Ben
d2b726ca-deab-4ccb-b942-cab2134c669e
Stedman, Brian
180a4644-f670-4da1-84db-9d5640e4ec1d
Johnson, Gavin
1cd7b817-0168-48a0-a392-71944cbfa3d7
Ahmad, Saqib
42b1b1f9-1537-46fa-9cb2-fa570f7c081a
Tehami, Nadeem
c3669784-48eb-406d-b62b-8a660e9d15b4

Siau, Keith, Webster, George and Wright, Mark , et al. (2021) Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey. Frontline Gastroenterology, 12 (7), 550-556. (doi:10.1136/flgastro-2020-101521).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Fluoroscopy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) exposes staff and patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation. We performed a UK survey to explore trainee and trainer attitudes to radiation protection and cholangiogram interpretation in ERCP.
Methods: An electronic 10-point survey was prospectively distributed to endoscopy unit leads, training programme directors between October and November 2019. Only UK-based ERCP trainees and trainers with hands-on procedural exposure were eligible for the survey.
Results: The survey was completed by 107 respondents (58 trainees and 49 trainers), with an estimated overall response rate of 46%. Overall, 49% of respondents were up to date with their radiation protection course, 38% were aware of European Basic safety standards directive (BSSD), 38% wore radiation protection goggles, and 40% were aware of the average radiation screening dose per ERCP procedure. Compared with trainers, trainees were less likely to routinely wear thyroid protection shields (76% vs 92%; p=0.028), have awareness of the BSSD (20% vs 49%; p=0.037) or know their average procedural radiation dosages (21% vs 63%; p<0.001). With regard to cholangiogram interpretation, only 26% had received formal training, with 97% of trainees expressing a desire for further training.
Conclusion: This survey highlights a relative complacency in safety attitudes to radiation protection during ERCP. These data provide impetus to improve training and quality assurance in radiation protection, which should be regarded as a mandatory safety aspect prior to commencing hands-on ERCP training.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 November 2020
Published date: 1 January 2021
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477517
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477517
ISSN: 2041-4137
PURE UUID: a9bb98df-0430-412f-bc6f-b65ca7510010

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2023 17:08
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Keith Siau
Author: George Webster
Author: Mark Wright
Author: Ben Maher
Author: Brian Stedman
Author: Gavin Johnson
Author: Saqib Ahmad
Author: Nadeem Tehami
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×