Dynamic socket interface mechanics for a transfemoral amputee during walking
Dynamic socket interface mechanics for a transfemoral amputee during walking
Introduction: dynamic coupling at the residuum/socket interface of lower-limb amputees is an important research topic. Coupling is the complex biomechanical interaction involving multi-directional kinetic forces including pressure and shear exerted at socket interface, and relative residuum kinematics within the socket, simultaneously. To date, there are limited studies assessing combined kinematics and kinetics at this critical interface. Research Question: We aim to study transfemoral socket interface loading and residuum relative motion using interface sensors and a verified Finite Element Analysis (FEA) platform.
Methods: a left-sided female transfemoral amputee participated (weight 56kg, ischial containment socket). Flexible tri-axial pressure and shear (TRIPS) sensors [1] were placed within the socket at known load-bearing regions (Figure 1a), i.e., posterior-distal-end (PD), posterior-proximal (PP) and anterior-proximal (AP) sites, from which pressure (P), circumferential (SC) and longitudinal shear (SL) were obtained while walking along a 35-metre level surface. Interface stresses and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were obtained during gait cycles (GCs).
The participant’s residuum and socket were 3D-scanned to develop models for FEA. Young’s Moduli of 200kPa and 278kPa and Poisson’s ratios of 0.45 and 0.49 were used to represent skin and liner, respectively. Friction coefficient of 0.5 was applied to liner/socket interface; other interfaces were assumed bonded [2]. The hip joint was fixed while corresponding GRFs were applied to socket’s distal-end to evaluate relative residuum displacement during a typical GC.
Results: figure 1b-j shows pressure and shear of up to 40±2kPa and 5±3kPa, respectively. Figure 1k shows axial and anterior-posterior movement of distal-end region. The residuum moved 9mm down the socket and experienced anterior-posterior displacement of up to 8mm relative to its position at 0% GC.
Discussion: double-hump pressure profiles aligned with known gait profiles at all sites indicating effective transfer of GRFs to socket interface confirming sensors were indeed located at load-bearing anatomical landmarks [3]. Pressure and shear obtained via FEA roughly align with those in Figure1b-j.
Axial displacement at PD site was lower than previous measurements through means of 3D-motion capture [4], possibly due to amount of tissue present and different socket type. More importantly, peak axial displacement at 15% GC aligns with +SL peak (Figure 1d) indicating “pistoning” as the residuum moved down in the socket during early-stance. Furthermore, negative anterior-posterior displacement during early-stance (7% GC) suggests the residuum moved in posterior direction as bodyweight transferred to prosthetic side. In contrast, positive anterior-posterior displacement during late-stance (50% GC) coincides with peak pressure of 32±1kPa at AP (Figure 1h), suggesting the residuum moved anteriorly in the socket.
References: [1] P. Laszczak et al., "A pressure and shear sensor system for stress measurement at lower limb residuum/socket interface," Med Eng Phys, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 695-700, Jul 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.04.007.
[2] J. W. Steer, P. R. Worsley, M. Browne, and A. Dickinson, "Key considerations for finite element modelling of the residuum–prosthetic socket interface," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, p. 0309364620967781, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0309364620967781.
[3] S. C. Henao, C. Orozco, and J. Ramírez, "Influence of Gait Cycle Loads on Stress Distribution at The Residual Limb/Socket Interface of Transfemoral Amputees: A Finite Element Analysis," Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4985, 2020/03/19 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61915-1.
[4] J. Tang et al., "Characterisation of dynamic couplings at lower limb residuum/socket interface using 3D motion capture," (in eng), Med Eng Phys, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1162-8, Dec 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.10.004.
S47-S48
Devin, Kirstie
a8f23fa0-db53-44a4-abd8-03a72800f88d
Tang, Jinghua
b4b9a22c-fd6d-427a-9ab1-51184c1d2a2c
Moser, David
09874cab-348f-47f9-b018-1c2875d16998
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
13 September 2023
Devin, Kirstie
a8f23fa0-db53-44a4-abd8-03a72800f88d
Tang, Jinghua
b4b9a22c-fd6d-427a-9ab1-51184c1d2a2c
Moser, David
09874cab-348f-47f9-b018-1c2875d16998
Jiang, Liudi
374f2414-51f0-418f-a316-e7db0d6dc4d1
Devin, Kirstie, Tang, Jinghua, Moser, David and Jiang, Liudi
(2023)
Dynamic socket interface mechanics for a transfemoral amputee during walking.
Gait & Posture, 106 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.060).
Record type:
Special issue
Abstract
Introduction: dynamic coupling at the residuum/socket interface of lower-limb amputees is an important research topic. Coupling is the complex biomechanical interaction involving multi-directional kinetic forces including pressure and shear exerted at socket interface, and relative residuum kinematics within the socket, simultaneously. To date, there are limited studies assessing combined kinematics and kinetics at this critical interface. Research Question: We aim to study transfemoral socket interface loading and residuum relative motion using interface sensors and a verified Finite Element Analysis (FEA) platform.
Methods: a left-sided female transfemoral amputee participated (weight 56kg, ischial containment socket). Flexible tri-axial pressure and shear (TRIPS) sensors [1] were placed within the socket at known load-bearing regions (Figure 1a), i.e., posterior-distal-end (PD), posterior-proximal (PP) and anterior-proximal (AP) sites, from which pressure (P), circumferential (SC) and longitudinal shear (SL) were obtained while walking along a 35-metre level surface. Interface stresses and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were obtained during gait cycles (GCs).
The participant’s residuum and socket were 3D-scanned to develop models for FEA. Young’s Moduli of 200kPa and 278kPa and Poisson’s ratios of 0.45 and 0.49 were used to represent skin and liner, respectively. Friction coefficient of 0.5 was applied to liner/socket interface; other interfaces were assumed bonded [2]. The hip joint was fixed while corresponding GRFs were applied to socket’s distal-end to evaluate relative residuum displacement during a typical GC.
Results: figure 1b-j shows pressure and shear of up to 40±2kPa and 5±3kPa, respectively. Figure 1k shows axial and anterior-posterior movement of distal-end region. The residuum moved 9mm down the socket and experienced anterior-posterior displacement of up to 8mm relative to its position at 0% GC.
Discussion: double-hump pressure profiles aligned with known gait profiles at all sites indicating effective transfer of GRFs to socket interface confirming sensors were indeed located at load-bearing anatomical landmarks [3]. Pressure and shear obtained via FEA roughly align with those in Figure1b-j.
Axial displacement at PD site was lower than previous measurements through means of 3D-motion capture [4], possibly due to amount of tissue present and different socket type. More importantly, peak axial displacement at 15% GC aligns with +SL peak (Figure 1d) indicating “pistoning” as the residuum moved down in the socket during early-stance. Furthermore, negative anterior-posterior displacement during early-stance (7% GC) suggests the residuum moved in posterior direction as bodyweight transferred to prosthetic side. In contrast, positive anterior-posterior displacement during late-stance (50% GC) coincides with peak pressure of 32±1kPa at AP (Figure 1h), suggesting the residuum moved anteriorly in the socket.
References: [1] P. Laszczak et al., "A pressure and shear sensor system for stress measurement at lower limb residuum/socket interface," Med Eng Phys, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 695-700, Jul 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.04.007.
[2] J. W. Steer, P. R. Worsley, M. Browne, and A. Dickinson, "Key considerations for finite element modelling of the residuum–prosthetic socket interface," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, p. 0309364620967781, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0309364620967781.
[3] S. C. Henao, C. Orozco, and J. Ramírez, "Influence of Gait Cycle Loads on Stress Distribution at The Residual Limb/Socket Interface of Transfemoral Amputees: A Finite Element Analysis," Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 4985, 2020/03/19 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61915-1.
[4] J. Tang et al., "Characterisation of dynamic couplings at lower limb residuum/socket interface using 3D motion capture," (in eng), Med Eng Phys, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1162-8, Dec 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.10.004.
Text
ESMAC2023_final_Devin_Tang_Moser_Jiang
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
GaitPost-S0966636223009803-Devinetal
- Version of Record
Restricted to Registered users only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 June 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 September 2023
Published date: 13 September 2023
Venue - Dates:
European Society for Movement Analysis in Adults and Children (ESMAC), Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece, 2023-09-18 - 2023-09-23
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477704
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477704
ISSN: 0966-6362
PURE UUID: dbdae19a-e064-44ef-b59c-3eee1914770c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jun 2023 17:02
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 05:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kirstie Devin
Author:
David Moser
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics