The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sex, benevolence and willingness to pay for screening

Sex, benevolence and willingness to pay for screening
Sex, benevolence and willingness to pay for screening
Purpose: We report the findings of a contingent valuation survey of health care services, designed to illuminate self-interest and benevolence on the part of one sex for the other.

Design/methodology/approach: In a constructed scenario, men and women recorded how much they would be willing to contribute to each of three different types of cancer screening, one of which would be available only to members of the opposite sex.

Findings: Over two-thirds of individuals, amongst whom men were more heavily represented, chose an identical contingent valuation for all three services. Amongst those who nominated dissimilar values, a willingness to contribute to own-sex screening coupled with an unwillingness to contribute to opposite-sex screening was more common amongst women than amongst men. Both sexes valued own-sex screening more highly than opposite-sex screening yet, compared with men, women were prepared to offer proportionately less for the latter relative to the former. In an associated person trade-off task, women were considerably less likely than men to choose opposite-sex screening at the expense of a type from which they could benefit personally.

Originality/value: To date, very little research has been undertaken on differential responses to health valuation of care provision by sex. The results suggest a degree of asymmetry between the sexes, with respect to self-interest and benevolence.
0306-8293
982-997
Whynes, David
9cf8c269-7497-4052-98af-6431c6972a94
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Whynes, David
9cf8c269-7497-4052-98af-6431c6972a94
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2

Whynes, David and Sach, Tracey (2016) Sex, benevolence and willingness to pay for screening. International Journal of Social Economics, 43 (10), 982-997. (doi:10.1108/IJSE-09-2014-0192).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: We report the findings of a contingent valuation survey of health care services, designed to illuminate self-interest and benevolence on the part of one sex for the other.

Design/methodology/approach: In a constructed scenario, men and women recorded how much they would be willing to contribute to each of three different types of cancer screening, one of which would be available only to members of the opposite sex.

Findings: Over two-thirds of individuals, amongst whom men were more heavily represented, chose an identical contingent valuation for all three services. Amongst those who nominated dissimilar values, a willingness to contribute to own-sex screening coupled with an unwillingness to contribute to opposite-sex screening was more common amongst women than amongst men. Both sexes valued own-sex screening more highly than opposite-sex screening yet, compared with men, women were prepared to offer proportionately less for the latter relative to the former. In an associated person trade-off task, women were considerably less likely than men to choose opposite-sex screening at the expense of a type from which they could benefit personally.

Originality/value: To date, very little research has been undertaken on differential responses to health valuation of care provision by sex. The results suggest a degree of asymmetry between the sexes, with respect to self-interest and benevolence.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477743
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477743
ISSN: 0306-8293
PURE UUID: 02f2d151-7c14-4193-8ff0-af824f06a492
ORCID for Tracey Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Jun 2023 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David Whynes
Author: Tracey Sach ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×