The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Engaging community members in setting priorities for nutrition interventions in rural northern Ghana

Engaging community members in setting priorities for nutrition interventions in rural northern Ghana
Engaging community members in setting priorities for nutrition interventions in rural northern Ghana

This study used "Choosing All Together" (CHAT), a deliberative engagement tool to prioritise nutrition interventions and to understand reasons for intervention choices of a rural community in northern Ghana. The study took an exploratory cross-sectional design and used a mixed method approach to collect data between December 2020 and February 2021. Eleven nutrition interventions were identified through policy reviews, interaction with different stakeholders and focus group discussions with community members. These interventions were costed for a modified CHAT tool-a board-like game with interventions represented by colour coded pies and the cost of the interventions represented by sticker holes. Supported by trained facilitators, six community groups used the tool to prioritise interventions. Discussions were audio-recoded, transcribed and thematically analysed. The participants prioritised both nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific interventions, reflecting the extent of poverty in the study districts and the direct and immediate benefits derived from nutrition-specific interventions. The prioritised interventions involved livelihood empowerment, because they would create an enabling environment for all-year-round agricultural output, leading to improved food security and income for farmers. Another nutrition-sensitive, education-related priority intervention was male involvement in food and nutrition practices; as heads of household and main decision makers, men were believed to be in a position to optimise maternal and child nutrition. The prioritised nutrition-specific intervention was micronutrient supplementation. Despite low literacy, participants were able to use CHAT materials and work collectively to prioritize interventions. In conclusion, it is feasible to modify and use the CHAT tool in public deliberations to prioritize nutrition interventions in rural settings with low levels of literacy. These communities prioritised both nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific interventions. Attending to community derived nutrition priorities may improve the relevance and effectiveness of nutrition health policy, since these priorities reflect the context in which such policy is implemented.

2767-3375
Dalaba, Maxwell Ayindenaba
2523a73e-ded2-4677-b453-93e1111fd676
Nonterah, Engelbert A.
aacb7a34-ceef-4a9f-93b8-707a29db42c6
Chatio, Samuel T.
9335e5cc-b71c-4366-9066-f9f2b487c000
Adoctor, James K.
5bd7472d-5987-48d4-974f-cee5e3922d22
Dambayi, Edith
e61b6367-9339-45b4-84d6-ef2c937f013f
Nonterah, Esmond W.
d4a6532a-131c-483e-bc56-8959e6b415b9
Azalia, Stephen
ff369014-55ad-4dc7-8ca7-f49c87b03b6e
Ayi-Bisah, Doreen
bdc544bd-92da-4c2e-8a2f-b0e86d3ae541
Erzse, Agnes
817251b4-544e-4535-8ceb-4d1126fe0102
Watson, Daniella
1ddbeaa5-d181-4c2c-9e6c-0a100130184d
Hardy-Johnson, Polly
49276c2f-01a9-4488-9f30-dc359cf867e0
Kehoe, Sarah H.
17aff028-df58-48b9-8e45-e1b353f61537
Tugendhaft, Aviva
df979acf-c507-4dd6-b077-a98c568f72ba
Ward, Kate
39bd4db1-c948-4e32-930e-7bec8deb54c7
Debpuur, Cornelius
86cc89d7-984e-4a7b-8130-5461a00d2bec
Oduro, Abraham
dd6fc6ff-5927-48bc-abfb-d572eb3da430
Ofosu, Winfred
3cea117a-5829-4993-ae08-004b86c91f9f
Danis, Marion
69a7de70-dc20-44c6-9f37-80ba4f10b185
Barker, Mary
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2
INPreP study group
Dalaba, Maxwell Ayindenaba
2523a73e-ded2-4677-b453-93e1111fd676
Nonterah, Engelbert A.
aacb7a34-ceef-4a9f-93b8-707a29db42c6
Chatio, Samuel T.
9335e5cc-b71c-4366-9066-f9f2b487c000
Adoctor, James K.
5bd7472d-5987-48d4-974f-cee5e3922d22
Dambayi, Edith
e61b6367-9339-45b4-84d6-ef2c937f013f
Nonterah, Esmond W.
d4a6532a-131c-483e-bc56-8959e6b415b9
Azalia, Stephen
ff369014-55ad-4dc7-8ca7-f49c87b03b6e
Ayi-Bisah, Doreen
bdc544bd-92da-4c2e-8a2f-b0e86d3ae541
Erzse, Agnes
817251b4-544e-4535-8ceb-4d1126fe0102
Watson, Daniella
1ddbeaa5-d181-4c2c-9e6c-0a100130184d
Hardy-Johnson, Polly
49276c2f-01a9-4488-9f30-dc359cf867e0
Kehoe, Sarah H.
17aff028-df58-48b9-8e45-e1b353f61537
Tugendhaft, Aviva
df979acf-c507-4dd6-b077-a98c568f72ba
Ward, Kate
39bd4db1-c948-4e32-930e-7bec8deb54c7
Debpuur, Cornelius
86cc89d7-984e-4a7b-8130-5461a00d2bec
Oduro, Abraham
dd6fc6ff-5927-48bc-abfb-d572eb3da430
Ofosu, Winfred
3cea117a-5829-4993-ae08-004b86c91f9f
Danis, Marion
69a7de70-dc20-44c6-9f37-80ba4f10b185
Barker, Mary
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2

Dalaba, Maxwell Ayindenaba, Nonterah, Engelbert A., Chatio, Samuel T., Adoctor, James K., Dambayi, Edith, Nonterah, Esmond W., Azalia, Stephen, Ayi-Bisah, Doreen, Erzse, Agnes, Watson, Daniella, Hardy-Johnson, Polly, Kehoe, Sarah H., Debpuur, Cornelius, Oduro, Abraham, Ofosu, Winfred, Danis, Marion and Barker, Mary , INPreP study group (2022) Engaging community members in setting priorities for nutrition interventions in rural northern Ghana. PLOS Global Public Health, 2 (9), [e0000447]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000447).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study used "Choosing All Together" (CHAT), a deliberative engagement tool to prioritise nutrition interventions and to understand reasons for intervention choices of a rural community in northern Ghana. The study took an exploratory cross-sectional design and used a mixed method approach to collect data between December 2020 and February 2021. Eleven nutrition interventions were identified through policy reviews, interaction with different stakeholders and focus group discussions with community members. These interventions were costed for a modified CHAT tool-a board-like game with interventions represented by colour coded pies and the cost of the interventions represented by sticker holes. Supported by trained facilitators, six community groups used the tool to prioritise interventions. Discussions were audio-recoded, transcribed and thematically analysed. The participants prioritised both nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific interventions, reflecting the extent of poverty in the study districts and the direct and immediate benefits derived from nutrition-specific interventions. The prioritised interventions involved livelihood empowerment, because they would create an enabling environment for all-year-round agricultural output, leading to improved food security and income for farmers. Another nutrition-sensitive, education-related priority intervention was male involvement in food and nutrition practices; as heads of household and main decision makers, men were believed to be in a position to optimise maternal and child nutrition. The prioritised nutrition-specific intervention was micronutrient supplementation. Despite low literacy, participants were able to use CHAT materials and work collectively to prioritize interventions. In conclusion, it is feasible to modify and use the CHAT tool in public deliberations to prioritize nutrition interventions in rural settings with low levels of literacy. These communities prioritised both nutrition-sensitive and nutrition-specific interventions. Attending to community derived nutrition priorities may improve the relevance and effectiveness of nutrition health policy, since these priorities reflect the context in which such policy is implemented.

Text
journal.pgph.0000447 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (813kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 April 2022
Published date: 16 September 2022
Additional Information: Copyright: © 2022 Dalaba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477925
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477925
ISSN: 2767-3375
PURE UUID: feba02bd-0e4d-494d-9ead-e860f0ea76ab
ORCID for Polly Hardy-Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-1447
ORCID for Kate Ward: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7034-6750
ORCID for Mary Barker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-0217

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jun 2023 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Maxwell Ayindenaba Dalaba
Author: Engelbert A. Nonterah
Author: Samuel T. Chatio
Author: James K. Adoctor
Author: Edith Dambayi
Author: Esmond W. Nonterah
Author: Stephen Azalia
Author: Doreen Ayi-Bisah
Author: Agnes Erzse
Author: Daniella Watson
Author: Polly Hardy-Johnson ORCID iD
Author: Sarah H. Kehoe
Author: Aviva Tugendhaft
Author: Kate Ward ORCID iD
Author: Cornelius Debpuur
Author: Abraham Oduro
Author: Winfred Ofosu
Author: Marion Danis
Author: Mary Barker ORCID iD
Corporate Author: INPreP study group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×