The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

PTU-004 hepatocellular carcinoma can be managed safely and effectively in a DGH-setting with superior surveillance-programme survival

PTU-004 hepatocellular carcinoma can be managed safely and effectively in a DGH-setting with superior surveillance-programme survival
PTU-004 hepatocellular carcinoma can be managed safely and effectively in a DGH-setting with superior surveillance-programme survival
Introduction and aims: HCC is the second commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide and strongly associated with liver cirrhosis and with a rising incidence. Despite screening most HCC cases present at an intermediate or advanced stage unsuitable for curative surgery. The standard of care for most non-curative cases being actively treated remains transarterial chemo-embolisation TACE and/or ablation (RFA.) Both are specialist procedures normally delivered in tertiary centres. At the Royal Bournemouth Hospital (RBH), a large DGH, specialist HCC treatments are offered to Dorset County following MDT and combined hepatology/IR clinic review. There is an established surveillance programme offered to all suitable at-risk patients. We sought to assess the outcomes of the service with a focus on the benefits of surveillance and the safety of offering tertiary level services in a DGH setting.

Methods: we identified all new HCC cases presented in the pan-Dorset Upper GI MDT from Jan 2017 to Dec 2017. We collected demographic data, whether they had been under a surveillance programme and the treatment outcomes including complications and 1- and 12- month mortality.

Results: we identified 35 patients (30 M; 5F.) The aetiology was alcohol in 26% (n=9), NASH 43% (n=15), HCV 17% (n=6) and others 9% (n=3.) Cirrhosis was present in 63% (n=22): Child’s A 59% (n=13), Child’s B 32% (n=7) & Child’s C 9% (n=2.). Most cases were referred from RBH 77% (n=27), and 23% from the two other referring hospitals in the County. HCC surveillance detected 43% (n=15) of cases with 57% new presentations. Of the surveillance cases, the majority 87% (n=13) were identified at the centre with the most established surveillance programme but as the largest centre RBH also identified most new presentations 70% (n=14.). More active treatment was offered to the surveillance group at 87% vs 65% of non-surveillance group (p≤0.05.). Curative treatment (transplant, surgery or RFA to small HCC) was suitable in only 14.3% (n=5), all identified by surveillance. TACE was offered to 46% of patients (n=16.) Of the TACE patients, 56% (n= 9) underwent more than 1 procedure. Only 2 patients had decompensation post-TACE, which recovered. Post-TACE survival was 100% at 1 month and 79% at 1 year. These outcomes are comparable to published literature from larger centres. Overall 1-month and 12-month survival for surveillance cases was better than new presentations at 100% and 73% vs 85% and 50% respectively (p≤0.05.)

Conclusions: specialist HCC treatment, following combined hepatology/IR review, can be offered safely and effectively in a large DGH setting with mortality and morbidities outcomes comparable to specialist tertiary centres. Our data confirms HCC surveillance allows for earlier cancer detection with more treatment options and improved survival.
1468-3288
Asad, Muhammad
75e8a334-645a-485d-b32c-51376d72cbf1
Bent, Clare
166efd1a-e6a5-44eb-844c-cb7102c7e489
Shawyer, Andrew
342056a1-5deb-4d67-a85f-04d4e42d5e36
Williams, Earl
d59ff6ce-7bf2-4a9c-aa5d-ae00850b2e1c
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3
Al-shamma, Safa
ffaa9e4a-fc19-48c0-8561-8be5af0eb3e4
Asad, Muhammad
75e8a334-645a-485d-b32c-51376d72cbf1
Bent, Clare
166efd1a-e6a5-44eb-844c-cb7102c7e489
Shawyer, Andrew
342056a1-5deb-4d67-a85f-04d4e42d5e36
Williams, Earl
d59ff6ce-7bf2-4a9c-aa5d-ae00850b2e1c
Stammers, Matthew
a4ad3bd5-7323-4a6d-9c00-2c34f8ae5bd3
Al-shamma, Safa
ffaa9e4a-fc19-48c0-8561-8be5af0eb3e4

Asad, Muhammad, Bent, Clare, Shawyer, Andrew, Williams, Earl, Stammers, Matthew and Al-shamma, Safa (2019) PTU-004 hepatocellular carcinoma can be managed safely and effectively in a DGH-setting with superior surveillance-programme survival. Gut, 68 (2). (doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-BSGAbstracts.213).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Introduction and aims: HCC is the second commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide and strongly associated with liver cirrhosis and with a rising incidence. Despite screening most HCC cases present at an intermediate or advanced stage unsuitable for curative surgery. The standard of care for most non-curative cases being actively treated remains transarterial chemo-embolisation TACE and/or ablation (RFA.) Both are specialist procedures normally delivered in tertiary centres. At the Royal Bournemouth Hospital (RBH), a large DGH, specialist HCC treatments are offered to Dorset County following MDT and combined hepatology/IR clinic review. There is an established surveillance programme offered to all suitable at-risk patients. We sought to assess the outcomes of the service with a focus on the benefits of surveillance and the safety of offering tertiary level services in a DGH setting.

Methods: we identified all new HCC cases presented in the pan-Dorset Upper GI MDT from Jan 2017 to Dec 2017. We collected demographic data, whether they had been under a surveillance programme and the treatment outcomes including complications and 1- and 12- month mortality.

Results: we identified 35 patients (30 M; 5F.) The aetiology was alcohol in 26% (n=9), NASH 43% (n=15), HCV 17% (n=6) and others 9% (n=3.) Cirrhosis was present in 63% (n=22): Child’s A 59% (n=13), Child’s B 32% (n=7) & Child’s C 9% (n=2.). Most cases were referred from RBH 77% (n=27), and 23% from the two other referring hospitals in the County. HCC surveillance detected 43% (n=15) of cases with 57% new presentations. Of the surveillance cases, the majority 87% (n=13) were identified at the centre with the most established surveillance programme but as the largest centre RBH also identified most new presentations 70% (n=14.). More active treatment was offered to the surveillance group at 87% vs 65% of non-surveillance group (p≤0.05.). Curative treatment (transplant, surgery or RFA to small HCC) was suitable in only 14.3% (n=5), all identified by surveillance. TACE was offered to 46% of patients (n=16.) Of the TACE patients, 56% (n= 9) underwent more than 1 procedure. Only 2 patients had decompensation post-TACE, which recovered. Post-TACE survival was 100% at 1 month and 79% at 1 year. These outcomes are comparable to published literature from larger centres. Overall 1-month and 12-month survival for surveillance cases was better than new presentations at 100% and 73% vs 85% and 50% respectively (p≤0.05.)

Conclusions: specialist HCC treatment, following combined hepatology/IR review, can be offered safely and effectively in a large DGH setting with mortality and morbidities outcomes comparable to specialist tertiary centres. Our data confirms HCC surveillance allows for earlier cancer detection with more treatment options and improved survival.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 June 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477968
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477968
ISSN: 1468-3288
PURE UUID: 90d5d4cb-c268-45ca-b95e-f0ccf508fe4c
ORCID for Matthew Stammers: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-3116

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jun 2023 16:33
Last modified: 21 Sep 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Muhammad Asad
Author: Clare Bent
Author: Andrew Shawyer
Author: Earl Williams
Author: Matthew Stammers ORCID iD
Author: Safa Al-shamma

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×