Multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes for the elderly: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analysis
Multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes for the elderly: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analysis
BACKGROUND: Evidence demonstrates that measures are needed to optimise therapy and improve administration of medicines in care homes for older people. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a novel model of multi-professional medication review.
METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial design, involving thirty care homes. In line with current practice in medication reviews, recruitment and consent will be sought from general practitioners and care homes, rather than individual residents. Care homes will be segmented according to size and resident mix and allocated to the intervention arm (15 homes) or control arm (15 homes) sequentially using minimisation. Intervention homes will receive a multi-professional medication review at baseline and at 6 months, with follow-up at 12 months. Control homes will receive usual care (support they currently receive from the National Health Service), with data collection at baseline and 12 months. The novelty of the intervention is a review of medications by a multi-disciplinary team. Primary outcome measures are number of falls and potentially inappropriate prescribing. Secondary outcome measures include medication costs, health care resource use, hospitalisations and mortality. The null hypothesis proposes no difference in primary outcomes between intervention and control patients. The primary outcome variable (number of falls) will be analysed using a linear mixed model, with the intervention specified as a fixed effect and care homes included as a random effect. Analyses will be at the level of the care home. The economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care from a National Health Service and personal social services perspective.The study is not measuring the impact of the intervention on professional working relationships, the medicines culture in care homes or the generic health-related quality of life of residents.
DISCUSSION: This study will establish the effectiveness of a new model of multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes, using novel approaches to recruitment and consent. It is the first study to undertake an examination of direct patient outcomes, together with an economic analysis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN90761620.
Aged, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Utilization Review, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Sample Size
218
Desborough, James
5ec7cf8c-01fe-40ab-ba59-2ffa7057be46
Houghton, Julie
0fa84e15-dd35-4c7e-b5df-3563629b2686
Wood, John
db7a1d26-2591-4a71-aca4-990f2a13d4a3
Wright, David
a55be721-4b15-4555-bf61-73fcb75c1a39
Holland, Richard
f2fb8045-c472-4243-95c3-84256ed043a2
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Ashwell, Sue
43eccae5-f092-4425-bfce-1d4f8c7d92d9
Shaw, Val
b8ed16c1-9087-4d00-9ab0-f0c3cf961a3d
5 October 2011
Desborough, James
5ec7cf8c-01fe-40ab-ba59-2ffa7057be46
Houghton, Julie
0fa84e15-dd35-4c7e-b5df-3563629b2686
Wood, John
db7a1d26-2591-4a71-aca4-990f2a13d4a3
Wright, David
a55be721-4b15-4555-bf61-73fcb75c1a39
Holland, Richard
f2fb8045-c472-4243-95c3-84256ed043a2
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Ashwell, Sue
43eccae5-f092-4425-bfce-1d4f8c7d92d9
Shaw, Val
b8ed16c1-9087-4d00-9ab0-f0c3cf961a3d
Desborough, James, Houghton, Julie, Wood, John, Wright, David, Holland, Richard, Sach, Tracey, Ashwell, Sue and Shaw, Val
(2011)
Multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes for the elderly: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with cost effectiveness analysis.
Trials, 12, .
(doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-218).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence demonstrates that measures are needed to optimise therapy and improve administration of medicines in care homes for older people. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a novel model of multi-professional medication review.
METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial design, involving thirty care homes. In line with current practice in medication reviews, recruitment and consent will be sought from general practitioners and care homes, rather than individual residents. Care homes will be segmented according to size and resident mix and allocated to the intervention arm (15 homes) or control arm (15 homes) sequentially using minimisation. Intervention homes will receive a multi-professional medication review at baseline and at 6 months, with follow-up at 12 months. Control homes will receive usual care (support they currently receive from the National Health Service), with data collection at baseline and 12 months. The novelty of the intervention is a review of medications by a multi-disciplinary team. Primary outcome measures are number of falls and potentially inappropriate prescribing. Secondary outcome measures include medication costs, health care resource use, hospitalisations and mortality. The null hypothesis proposes no difference in primary outcomes between intervention and control patients. The primary outcome variable (number of falls) will be analysed using a linear mixed model, with the intervention specified as a fixed effect and care homes included as a random effect. Analyses will be at the level of the care home. The economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care from a National Health Service and personal social services perspective.The study is not measuring the impact of the intervention on professional working relationships, the medicines culture in care homes or the generic health-related quality of life of residents.
DISCUSSION: This study will establish the effectiveness of a new model of multi-professional clinical medication reviews in care homes, using novel approaches to recruitment and consent. It is the first study to undertake an examination of direct patient outcomes, together with an economic analysis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN90761620.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 5 October 2011
Keywords:
Aged, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Utilization Review, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Sample Size
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 478080
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478080
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 2d898717-9b05-4d89-aa23-9bc5f7bec2b2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jun 2023 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James Desborough
Author:
Julie Houghton
Author:
John Wood
Author:
Richard Holland
Author:
Tracey Sach
Author:
Sue Ashwell
Author:
Val Shaw
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics